We differ on validity on viability of a Utopian Nanny State vs a State that continually iterates through a complex meta-systemic world.
What? We have elections every 2 years which typically counter balance the Executive election. The pendulum swings. Like I’ve said before, if you’ve got “the answer”, then ammend the Constitution, pack the Supreme Court and Federalize everything and you’re golden.
Which abortions as “necessary” in your view?
Right. That cute slippery slope is only a fallacy when it’s a concern with those that don’t agree?
Didn’t you just use the “I don’t buy it” when I said we would course correct as we always do? If you are being logical, I’m not following it (or am being non Teal).
Or are you afraid that an ideology counter to yours is likely to grow for a decade? Tangerines are delicious.
Ok. So when Jamall climbs through Brittany’s window and knocks up, it’s now a “life threatening” scenario? Very life threatening for Jamall Jr in your world.
I think we’ve know for many decades that mental development is highly formative until at least 25. This is not a new concept.
We’ve compromised on 18 as the age of Majority since we need malleable soldiers in time of war, and cotes in elections. You’re saying we should open the flood gates to humans who are going through the most profound hormonal, physical and mental transformations a human goes through to make life altering decisions, without the knowledge of or guidance from their closest human caretakers?
Interesting idea. What could possibly go wrong giving the teenagers the keys to the liquor cabinet, the car, the pot stash, and syringes of hormones?
And if we don’t it’s “child abuse”. Makes sense in Zones 5 and 9.