Differences in "average" development speed between genders/sex

As I was reading the queen’s code of Alison Armstrong, it struck me that, although we are all equally capable, biology also creates differences in how we approach development, and how fast we can go through each stage.

A male brain is very “unconscious” and “focused”: it wants to accomplish the one goal and neglects everything else that is irrelevant to that goal (until breaking point).
On the other hand, a female brain is hyper conscious of their environment, people, emotions. They have a much harder time focusing on only the one thing.
That makes men better at production, protecting, providing; while women are better at social, nurturing, connecting.

But this is where I had a thought I wanted to share:
In order to grow, you need to process your experience, reflections etc. And make that a part of yourself/make that be yourself. Then those processed things become “unconscious” part of your being (e.g a toddler learns to walk and it is hard at the start, but as an adult you dont even consciously think about moving this and that muscle).

But because women have a tendency to be hyperconscious, I would think they have a much harder time than men making conscious choices to be more “unconscious” (I hope I am not losing everyone), hence it is not as natural for them to grow, and they have to put that much more effort into disconnecting, reorganising themselves, clearing distractions etc.

So, although everyone can grow and mature, women will always have a harder time maturing, and that perhaps explain why the average of men and women is not living on the same stage (just quoting Hoe_Math here, not sure where he got that information from but it would make sense)

It’s a bit more complicated and from my experiences, women are developmentally ahead, yet I got myself thinking about this just today, especially by academic standards many women are ahead, yet integral consciouness in 4 quadrants expressions has not fully solidified itself, and many are seeking that with the underbelly of umber very often, as umber has gone missing with men, pragmatism and expertise in depth in an area, as due to post-modernity they are forced to embrace the nuances of green for example privacy of a person, instead of seeing oneself as world citizen. Many men sort of have to deal with the red/blue narccicisms of todays age, were authority, power god drives and narccistic exterior demanding of objects are of interest instead of gaining more wholness and integrating oneself.

Even what Jordan Peterson talks about with post modernity in scandinavian countries in the interests, there show the tendencies the Alision Armstrong book speaks about, women choose more nuturing caring vocations and life paths, as they are more interested in expressing it biologically, imo at teal+ you become more interested to be whole for the larger good, true and beautiful, I WE and IT’s in my own terms for humanity, and work on integrating the various hick-ups and developmental procceses along, imo women are ahead, as they naturally can form an integral consciouness, men might be better at certain stages at previous levels, and the natural proclivities imo are brought to the forefront more strongly at teal, as both are able to engage at a deeper polarity while not being in the academic neutral standing, or even charge the academic neutral energy polarity of emotions & sex.

The whole issue of gender is transcended and included at teal, hence you develop more righ-brain capacities which many vision logic early men do, and realize the altitude forces them back to integrating the healthy best fit functionality of yang principles and dynamic of men or yang principles action, direction, leading, confidence, assertivness in AQAL fashion with the most 3 important developmental lines (quoting cosmic consciouness from Wilber audiobook) Cognitive, emotional and moral. The core issue is some women are not aware of the map, yet they play the territory, and most/some men are also at this level of awareness, there is a different emphasis on integrating development, and I don’t know statistically who has the upper-hand to reach teal/yellow or who is better from moving from teal to turqouise, if you think about it imo men should have it easier to move to teal, yet academic rigour focuses many to think at teal and forgets emotions and morals, and many women often include exactly that as they make the subject, object in that space and are able to regulate emotions properly etc.

A core bias of men is cynical mechanical technician view of reality, that creates another underbelly, if you’d be hyperconscioues the only issue is making wrong choices as you don’t know which level of development one engages in, and that causes issues etc. Due to the gender polarity imo many men and women have an issue integrating the polarity of healthy yin & yang principles of masculine and feminine as biological gender is fixed, and we as humans don’t have a new pair of organs that makes sex a different type of act of reproduction that would classifiy a new biological gender, instead of a modified version of male/female biologically with different social category and self-identifiaction.

Idk there is more to this, yet I found so much new stuff and I’ve been dating and stopped, due to various reasons, and found some loopholes were I am able to date quiet integrated women, yet it takes an integrated life style to meet integrated women, in that sense the easiest answer is like attracts like, and co-creating in a relationship that is integrally aware. I am not the best at it, as I realized my interest are very broad, and I have to work out a lot of hiccups, and I’ve been in the dating scene a bit and saw it’s hostility especially the ethnocentric views, and how women are often played at this umber/orange level of development mostly, and green is a different issue with covert status seeking and denying the performative maximization etc. I had this in the last relationship partially and I am still working out kinks, yet had to realize how deep this goes.

If you don’t include being more yin with men and seeing the polarity of being masculine and feminine and they reject you out of it, it’s also a developmental issue, and sure you can join these groups and get laid and play all of these games, yet I don’t buy it that it’s integral hoe_math is quiet good at pointing at the polarity and maps of development in natural language and making fun of the polarity occuring in dating, and yes many women are not so conscious if you include online-dating, often the most pragmatic factors work. Status, money etc. yet it does not gurantee a good relationship, I had luck so far as I played charm and took a course that seemed integral to me, yet also you can go out an approach women, be chill, causal and have results, dating is not about development I made that mistake, finding an integral partner is not easy, yet if you get good at either of it you spot the ones who have the potential to fit the conditional criteria, you’d yearn for in a relationship.

I am riffing of my own experiences and as I don’t own the book, I let the a.i write me the gist of it, as I could learn from the perspective this is what the idea give me as a brief overview:

The Queen’s Code by Alison Armstrong is essentially a relationship and communication guide that reframes how women and men relate — with a focus on shifting from criticism and control toward respect, appreciation, and partnership.

Here’s the gist:


Core Premise

  • Many women (often unknowingly) relate to men in a way that disempowers them — by criticizing, micromanaging, or holding contempt — which in turn blocks intimacy, trust, and love.
  • When women understand men’s needs, instincts, and emotional wiring, they can communicate in ways that bring out men’s best qualities.
  • This is not about submission; it’s about partnership — both giving and receiving from a place of dignity.

Key Ideas

  1. Stop “killing” the King
  • “Killing” refers to subtle ways women diminish men — sarcasm, correcting, shaming, or implying they’re inadequate.
  • The Queen’s Code is about treating men like kings: respecting their masculinity, trusting their competence, and appreciating their efforts.
  1. Speak to men in the “language of heroes”
  • Men respond best to direct requests, clear appreciation, and acknowledgment of their intentions, not just their actions.
  • Replace vague hints or complaints with specific, positive requests.
  1. Understanding men’s instincts
  • Armstrong outlines how men’s behaviors often come from primal drives — providing, protecting, procreating — and how these differ from women’s instinctive priorities.
  • Recognizing these instincts helps avoid taking certain behaviors personally.
  1. Honor your own Queen
  • The book also calls on women to value themselves — to set boundaries, care for their needs, and stop over-giving out of resentment or martyrdom.
  • When a woman lives in her “Queen” energy, she naturally inspires loyalty and devotion.
  1. Gratitude and admiration as fuel
  • Men thrive when they feel admired for who they are and what they contribute.
  • Appreciation is not manipulation — it’s genuine recognition that fosters mutual respect.

Key Idea 1:

  • Yes, I experienced this and had a hero clash in my relationship as both showed up for each other, so they both yearned to be a hero for each other, and I personally have issues with the king archetype as I can’t constantly provide, and I get more emporer type of situations, were I am already healthy as a king mostly, yet

Key Idea 2: Yes, the sublte appreciation of ones and each others key strength, purpose and what makes the person special is something many women crave, and even men, I am of the same boat that young women don’t really know how to do this, as they are pampered with attention from online plattforms from horny men.

Key Idea 3: If you ever make yourself a female profile (I did once) and check how men write to you, you’d see how important it is to value yourself and the issue of narccicism of being a queen and the tyranny of being a king imo, I had a better integration of being a queen as I could appreciate myself more, and performative issues showed up

To be a bit more critical many men are mocked nowadays for their abillities, especially if they are not fully mature and the LR or UR behaviour of men is what is sort of the most gender typical critiques I see if there is not even an awarness of social gender as a construct and the covert competition that can occure at green etc. Were the independent developmental process is not honored and narccicism is an issue, some just really want all of the b.s. and what I notice from hoe math, the level of effort a teal/TIER 2 person has to make in order to be with green is lunacy, especially if problems and shadows are present if if the person has the capacity or you give them the benefit of the doubt, the risk is life style and UL/UR/LL/LR occurences change dramatically if you hit teal, the level of isolation and best fit functionality and the whole spectrum of playing with all lines in dating.

Keith Witts course is good to give a level of grounding, of what a relationship from an integral perspective can be like. Here is to your success with this! I am also in the process! I found more layers that I can work on, and I don’t simply yearn to get family, and reproduce, for me that is a very darwinistic type of relationship without any spiritual dimension that was horrible, even if art is included that was not enough for my relationship and just all the issues that can arise with children etc. She wanted 5 children I am an only child like wtf, but this was also very synchronistic to my healing process. May this give you what you need right now.

The best thing you can do is to provide a safe container for mutal growth, to grow through the stages and see if it pans out or translate the span of it while respecting the depth and protecting it, some are just not interested and rather crave career, family or children without developing through the stages and that is fine.

1 Like

So much insight thank you! I completely understand that this hyperconscious trait may be problematic at lower levels, but actually becomes a strength as you get more mature and need to engage your whole self.

This makes me think there is a very real balance that can be obtained to feed both yin and yang at the right pace for a relationship to flourish. It is not as simple as growing, there is the right energy that you need to attach for it to be engaging.

On the personal, I am nowhere near where I want to be (I think my body and mind are not playing the same game right now, need more actions and practice), so not too interested in dating for the moment, but I will go have a look at what you suggested. It does feel lonely when you cannot really talk about your view of the world, and have to reduce it, but at the same time even reducing it is fascinating… its a complicated feeling for me. I am sure as I continue to grow/connect things in my life I will find the places that you and others get together at!

All the best to you as well! Seems you got a solid plan working for you.

Yes, it’s a polarity and that dynamic can feel tedious I did not engage in that type of viewpoint, as I am constantly partially forced to act from this higher level, and a lot of people (especiall I presume you’re also german native/speaking) are more prone to the pragmatic/umber cynical mechanic/technician type of notion or performance metrics chasing. Having integrated that mostly gives you solidity, and the type of provision, yet I had to realize due to diversity I received Infrared projections and even envy, and covert status games, as green can be a real danger if it turns amber, but a lot of stuff was my fault by excessively engaging in desires, I could even fine-tune, and I will, yet I contemplated the maps from Integral Psychology and ROT dysfunctions from Wilber and had to realize how backwards all of this is due to California politics, Musk, Russia and the EU being forced to act, and the whole issue of gender, especially in my family enviroment as it’s extremely liberal, and I was affected by the collective not seeing differentiating, transcending and including is the best thing to do and even works with green, just false differentiations and excesses can be an issue, especially with narccisitic cravings and covert or overt power games.

I been there, if you can take action and setup a self-supporting system is the best you can do, for whatever purpose you enjoy developing in, creating vision-logic networks is natural at teal, yet many are not really there yet to integrate it via LR systems neither do they care to have that type of development and if stuff can go very fast if you consider LinkedIn or how many work since covid, constantly travelling expanding networks, especially in tech were things can be fast paced if you enjoy working like this, as well as finding the right anchors of groups you can sponatenous attune to and as well as structurally with discipline or consistency, I also struggle with this, as I notice I require less and less the more I am engaged with my life process. I can recommend both books, especially ROT if you’re into more cognitive heavy material.

Thank you! Only seems like it : p

1 Like

Wow! Elvis has NOT left the building! Indiana wants me, but I can’t go back there to the 1950’s fundamentalist catholic upbringing and the fact that you can take the boy out of the bible belt, but you can’t take the bible belt out of the boy. Mom had 10 children and 4 miscarriages, so you are right! That certainly slowed her down, abuse from her father probably made her hyperconscious. beam me up scotty

I am referencing the natural differences that can influence the developments of differents levels. As another person replied (my understanding of it anyway), women may struggle in stage 3/4 and have a much easier time in 5/6 compared to men from their biological/chemical differences, which makes a lot of sense for me.

I was not trying to establish a superiority, just asking if there is recognised differences. I am sorry if my question invited any doubts on that point, English is not my first language and my thought process is not best expressed in language and words.