Possible to be Conservative, Heterosexual, Christian, and Integral?

[FermentedAgave]

How can you possibly separate Trump and not talk about him in a discussion about conservativism post 2016? At best you can say that conservatives are split in support for Trump but to say he does not have a overwhelming influence on what it means to be conservative today is ridiculous. So that’s why I mention Trump. It’s the great pink elephant in the china shop.

It seems you are demanding that any mention of conservatism automatically requires cycling onto and fixation with President Trump. That’s text book Critical Theory tactics, which you seem to wield like a bludgeon.

Again, moral relativism is Green and so of course I’ve been through that whole moral reconciliation process between Green and Amber several decades ago.

Congratulations. I’m simply not developed enough to have a dialog with you. Sorry about that Ray.

[Brian_Downey]

When I interact with people that are clearly interpreting existence from an Amber level or lower I have compassion for them like I would a child in a way. I accept that they’re at a level that some adults transcended earlier in life. If they start to get toxic and project shadow material and express their dogma, fear, and bias towards any group I will wish them well and walk away. It’s boring to argue with them because they don’t know the difference between subjectivity and objectivity and believe opinions are facts. The only one more foolish than the fool is the one that argues with them.-Lao Tzu

[excecutive]

The only one more foolish than the fool is the one that argues with them

There are many concrete understandings on non physical things. Here’s an example of the spiritual concept of math.

Imagine 6 year old Billy learning multiplication. He understand that 2 x 2 = 4 and then concludes that 3 x 3 = 6 because of his simple sound logic; seeing the x as a plus sign (+) turned sideways and argues with Jenny who says 3 x 3 = 9.

The subject is clear when the understanding is complete. How long does Jenny engage Billy in this argument? I am grateful to have the wisdom shared through @Brian_Downey.

Am I Jenny or Billy in this illustration? For a certainty I’ve played both sides of this drama. With spiritual clarity we can see all points of view.

Imagine your thinking is water and light that fills all the darkness and crevasses connecting everything into one whole understanding. Now ask … what role is the holistic view in this drama of conflict? The spiritual answer is that I AM Jenny, Billy and Lao Tzu in this reality and I can choose as I wish.

Be the polarity on either side or the three-fold cord of unity Ask now from this spiritual plateau how should I act in any such drama when I know not where I AM in this ratio of conflict?