Hi Julia,
You seem like a kind person, if you don’t mind me saying so.
“Kind” is an interesting word, both a noun meaning “class, sort, variety” and an adjective meaning “friendly, deliberately doing good to others.” Both uses of the word stem from the Old English (ge)cynde, meaning “natural, native, innate” and “with the feeling of relatives for each other” and “manner or way natural or proper to anyone.” The Old English root is also related to cynn, meaning “family,” so we get words like kin, kinship, kindred.
What I like about this etymology is the emphasis on the innateness of kindness, and that it is both natural and proper to anyone. I know many people who are very kind but who do not have a fully integral sensibility, but it could be true and certainly we want it to be true that Integralists on the whole are generally a “sort” of people in which a consciousness of kinship with everyone and all life, and a friendliness and deliberate goodness, have unfolded and are enacted moreso than in the population at large. Undoubtedly, kindness is an aid in helping and serving others.
A polarity that comes to mind for me around this topic is the capacity to be firm and the capacity to be yielding. Confucianism and Taoism emphasize these aspects of human nature, that one should aspire to be yielding on the outside (yin) and firm on the inside (yang). That firmness takes many shapes, but I think for Integralists it is most primary and noticeable in a solid, anti-fragile inner commitment to Wholeness, individually and in the world. The yieldingness takes many forms as well, but it is evident in the ability to allow and the ability to receive, the ability to bend, to flex and flow, and to submit and surrender when called for, including and perhaps most importantly during certain stages or phases of spiritual development.
I think those traits together, firmness and yieldingness, contribute to the kindness of Integralists.