Generated Messages

[VVilliam]

Be Taught 4

040123 [Optimized for Fitness Pay-offs]

15:05 [In William’s Room]

GM: Neuralink
Far Out! Shucks! Explain!
Life in Heaven- Guiding Us On Earth
‘The Dream Team’
Fast
The blurry line of the neutral zone
Music
As well as that pot of gold…
Remove the phenomena and apply science
Verbatim
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1089258#p1089258:~:text=we%20aren’t%20seeing…-,First%20Things%20First,-%5BCloser%20to%20The [First Things First]

William: FTL;
[Replying to Eddie Ramos in post #10]

[quote]If you read what is taking place and try and put yourself in Adam’s place, then perhaps because you and I would cast blame off of ourselves, doesn’t mean that this is the correct way to understand what we read in the scriptures. The scriptures do not record whatever has entered into the minds of men to speak, but they spoke as they were moved to speak and God recorded exactly that which he wanted to place within his word. This is why ALL of scripture is God breathed, meaning it came from the mouth of God.

That is debatable as “God-Breathed” could simply be referring to someone being inspired by their subjective relationship with a great mind they think of through the limitation of their own mind, and thus express imagery through the belief filters of their own minds.

This would signify that what anyone writes about such relationship their telling of it will be tainted with misunderstanding - especially if they themselves had the need to make their invisible friend more visible with dress-ups.

All theistic stories about the gods are more ancient than the discovery of writting, even as ancient as humans learning how to control fire - so this word was breathed through a different medium and kept alive and along with that natural process - many filters of human interaction with IT would have distorted the nature of the Thing that IT - fundamental - was/is - as if IT speaks for ITSelf through the prisms of human minds - as if IT would appear to be happy with what IT is being dressed up in…but how do we know, because to claim IT is happy with the arrangements, is dressing it up to look like that might be the case…

Is IT “God-Breathing” because it does not KNOW what IT is, and that is what the Tetragrammaton represents? [I AM “Whatever you want me to be”]

On one level, sure! Why not?

But on other levels, perhaps IT knows exactly what IT is and is open to the possibility that Individual Human Beings might possibly cease trying to dress IT up and cease believing in the stories which dressed IT up and start paying attention…

First - one has to be aware that we exist within a creation and discover the way which will show one that this is most likely the case.
Second - after First - one has to figure out the best ways in which one can assist the Creator in transmitting ITs “Word” on ITSelf even if that means IT has to undress and get naked so as we can get a better look at what IT is we aren’t seeing…

First Things First
[Closer to The Source
Who woulda thought!]

If one continues to view GOD through the dressings of a book, then the focus/worship is on the costume and not what resides underneath the costume…one will never get to first base going in that direction…[/quote]

GM: Be Taught
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1069172#p1069172

William: FTL;

GM: The God
Entheogen [psychoactive substances that induce alterations in perception, mood, consciousness, cognition, or behavior for the purposes of engendering …] [Engender - cause or give rise to (a feeling, situation, or condition).]
Stuff/things a complex and tricky undertaking…
The Dreamer dreams the dreamed and the dreamed think the dream is real

William: This is what I am presently talking about with Theophile
Re: Simulation Hypothesis and Evolution Theory and The First Creation Story

In that sense, while ST cannot be discarded, it still would have to adjust accordingly to be seen as the process which occurs re each unfolding, and each process is the product of the Mind which all this must be happening within, which produces the realities experienced.

GM: The Main Points on the Agenda
Little Pointers Are Signposts
Cunning
Express your feelings
End Of Chapter
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1077858#p1077858

William: FLT;

[quote]William: There is a lot to unpack here.
Learning to be conscious of the unconscious so that one may then recognize various impulses and where these originate from.
In a sense, this is the science of the mind I am attempting to explain to Sherlock. Things may indeed appear to be so mystical as to be of another universe entirely…and are thus given the title of being a Miracle…[/quote]

GM: The Wisdom of Foresight
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uD4jHDvNB80 [Bob Dylan - Death Is Not the End (Official Audio)] ww.youtube.com/watch?v=uD4jHDvNB80

William: Being prepared to accept that when the body dies, there is more to experience…

GM: There is a way to link all these seeming contradictions - so that coherent explanation brings these together…
All of life
That is the thing - once behavioural adjustments are instigated, the idea of existing within a suppression matrix becomes moot…it no longer matters where one is - it only matters what one is…so the adjustments have everything to do with self-identification…knowing who one actually is at ones core-identity…
Self-talk Root of all evil
Regimented

William: In that, if one is going to be genuinely unpleasant in ones internalizing, this will become apparent in ones external reality…evil is as evil does - which is a human thing…as per the discussion between Theophile and I re ST, ET and CT…

[quote]I don’t think we’re far apart. The issue as I see it is that you would subsume CT into ST whereas I feel that CT provides a distinct and necessary stage for ST to become a possibility in the first place, and that this is the stage we should assume we are in and focus our attention on. i.e., that such a God as ST proposes does not yet exist and that this world is not yet a simulation… We should think and act as if such a state has yet to be achieved, even if it already has.

[quote]While I understand your reservations, I think that to have a CT theory based upon the idea that The Mind grew out of the Creation and thus - is not directly responsible for the suffering one experiences by those inside said Creation, one is agreeing with the idea of The Problem of Evil, which your particular CT deals with, and which ET also deals with - neither of which, may be the best way to deal with said ‘problem’.

The thing I ask is whether this “problem” has actually been established as real or imagined and if not real, then it is an unnecessary layer to be adding - unnecessary baggage - and thus not appropriate to being attached to any theory, including CT and therefore doesn’t belong on the table of this discussion.[/quote]{SOURCE}[/quote]

GM: Epoché [“suspension of judgment” but also as “withholding of assent”]
The Visitation Event Heuristic Fearlessness Decisive
Be Taught
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1091568#p1091568

William: [quote]GM: https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1089611#p1089611

William: FTL;

[quote]So what’s going on here? Is this sick and hateful people projecting their own faults onto others? Is it a case of “every accusation is really a confession”? Something else? All of the above?

I think it is a case of the evolution of Human ethics and some being quicker at changing than others.
Add to that the religious finger-pointing, those who offend from such positions are naturally regarded as the worst, and it looks worse for that, than when committed by other groups who are not preaching the same sermon, or any sermon at all.

Once upon a time Humans behaved in such ways as a matter of nature - much like dolphins are seen to commit rape but are not seen to be sinning therein.

Incest was normal once.

The changes have come about through identifying actions which damage others, and seeking to do something about that.

Rape, slavery, incest, sexual, physical, emotional, phycological abuses are slowly identified and laws enacted in order to curb the practices - some learn faster than others.

Some Christians argue that those Christians who practice such things are not really Christians at all, citing the words of Jesus as evidence.

Others argue that the words of Jesus being bound within the Bible alongside the words of rapists, slavers, incestual, sexual, physical, emotional, phycological abusers and that Jesus himself being reported to have caused physical distress to stall-holders in the temple and olive trees, aren’t helpful to the process of learning to identify actions which damage others, and seeking to do something to cease with that type of behaviour.

And if we regard the current warnings about climate change and heading for a possible extinction event - this time caused by humans - we might understand that none of us have the moral high-ground, regardless of what position we hold on matters of God and stuff like that.

Perhaps too much judging and not enough doing [hypocrisy] will be the source-reason for our own extinction?[/quote]

GM: Simulation
Counsel[/quote]

GM: Can You Imagine…
‘Developing a thick skin’
Charity
Stuff/things a complex and tricky undertaking…

William: Without doubt - there is much to learn…

GM: https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1085464#p1085464

William: FTL;Re: If you were Satan…

[quote]Meantime, a Personal Signature does the trick.

Aside from a Personal Signature, there isn’t anything I can think of which would fit the script.
If it is a tattoo of some sort and everyone who accepts, has the same tattoo, it would act in the same way a Personal Signature currently acts - as in - grants access to the marketplace…

Questions re that;

Q: If Satan is sitting back - can he still achieve what was prophesied or…

Q: …Would Satan have to relinquish the prophesized power part along with the prophesized prestige part?

The reason I ask is because, while the OP is focused on Satan thwarting Father YWHW [and Son] by not going along with the prophecy, there may still be parts Satan can accomplish without having to play the role totally.

Q: Behind the scenes, what would Satan be planning, and…

Q: …is there any evidence we know of in today’s world which might infer deviousness behind those scenes?

Because, if there is - [or it could be] - then Humans could effectively be tricked into thinking that - because prophesy is not happening the way folk separately interpret the prophecy should happen - that there is no Satan or Father YHWH [and Son] and go along never suspecting that they were serving Satan.

Q: Can Satan deceive the world and thwart prophesy at the same time?
Q: Is Satan more intelligent than Humans?

_________________ But wait! There’s more! _________________

All this speculation about Satan thwarting Father YHWH assumes that Satan is more intelligent than Father YHWH.
Those whom assume such are basically showing the allegiance of their will to worship Satan’s intelligence.
Perhaps that is the Mark of The Beast.
[Loyalty or commitment to a superior or to a group or cause.]

[An attitude of the individuals mind which is altogether shared by millions of like-minded $itizens.]

To think that Satan can outsmart the Elder - The Father YHWH - is a fallacy in relation to biblical narrative.
That is to say,
IF one has to go outside of biblical narrative whilst arguing against biblical narrative
THEN one is ignoring biblical narrative on the one hand whilst on the other holding ones interpretation of it up as the interpretation to assume.

Such muddies the waters for all except those who have already noticed what is beneath the surface…[/quote]

GM: Perpetual

15:58
[167]
The Akashic Records
Do Not Worry
Majestic Twelve
All systems go
Got The Picture
Unus Mundus
Realm of Remembrance
Faith-based thinking
Ooky Spooky
True Colours
The Forerunner
Your Best Self

[VVilliam]

Be Taught 5

050123
“The Queen died peacefully at Balmoral…”
The Shifting Models of Existence
A complex and tricky undertaking…
Spacetime doesn’t really exist
A: To grow Human Personalities.
A life sentence ending in a death sentence

08:20
In the biblical telling of it
My alarm bells are ringing
The Judgement Algorithm
For the benefit of all beings
Stop. Listen. Observe.
Penetrate The Bidden Zone
Imposed Appropriates
Independent Commitment
The Navigator Can Read Maps.
Delightful Anticipation

GM: Sanctioned
The Master ColdFire Trick
Slaughter
In Out and All About
Under the breath words Context It Is Our Nature
In Human Form
Children of The Light
In The Mirror - Mirror Sense
Lift Your Gaze From The Fire
Be Taught
Brother

Concomitant Power [Concomitant - a phenomenon that naturally accompanies or follows something.]
Google
“Off you go to your quarters”

William: [quote]You can use this word to mean “housing” generally, although it’s most common for soldiers and servants to live in quarters.[/quote]

GM: The Twelve Disciples
“When we hear words spoken, we hear them. When we read words written, we also hear them.”
Indication
“I think it was an ambush or surprise attack” = An Opportunity To Commune
Better The Devil You Know
Deeper Questions Regarding Individual Existence
James (WingMakers)
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=13772859&postcount=198
William: FTL;

[quote]
IF:
There is a Cosmic Mind
THEN:
Eventually, any species which survives long enough to continue along with the unfolding universe will eventually discover that and invent ways in which to engage.[/quote]

GM:Peaceful Messiah
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1084045#p1084045

[quote][quote]Something “outside of GOD” contradicts “no outside of GOD.”

Creating something new does not contradict “no outside of GOD.”

Creating something new “outside of GOD”, does.[/quote]
[Replying to The Tanager in post #693]

It would be a contradiction if I was talking about them both being true at the same moment, but I’m not. “No outside of GOD prior to creation” and “outside of GOD at/after creation” are not logical contradictions.

No matter how you word it or what context you build around it, ‘outside of GOD’ contradicts ‘there is no outside of GOD’.

Adding the mind-construct of ‘time’ does not make a contradiction a non-contradiction.

Another way of looking at it, is that GOD is Omni-present - specifically “always in the now of every ‘moment’ - never absent - never outside of anything and everything never outside of GOD.”

There is no contradiction in referring to “No outside of GOD” unless one attempts in inject the idea that there actually is an outside of GOD. One is real and the other is human invention attempting to superimpose the false upon the real.
Saying ‘both’;

Tanager: It would be a contradiction if I was talking about them both being true at the same moment…
is relying upon unsupported assumption as;

There are no ‘both’. There is only One.

If one does a little study on the Set one will discover that the infinite progression can be shown to run opposite [as infinite regression] which signifies that the point where the video begins is the same as the begin/end points which turn up throughout the eternally unfolding.

Can you share the reasoning that shows this?

Sure - when I come across the video I picked the info up from, I will. From memory, the person showed that by applying the Set formula for the negative numbers, one gets a mirror-image of the Set, ‘going the other way’…having written that it occurred to me I could google something like “Mandelbrot Set negative equation” - there are articles on this you can view for yourself, if you make a similar worded search…

[quote]My statement has to do with our overall conversation here. Do you want to end this conversation because ‘the existence of a creator’ hasn’t been supported or carry on re the question “Do we exist within a creation?”

When I wrote “we know that it was built from something that already existed” I was referring to Energy and QF [matter] and if these things fundamentally represent GOD [re theistic ideas about existing within a creation] then they may as well be be accepted by theists, in that attitude.[/quote]

I don’t see any reason to believe your conditional here. Why should I believe that energy and matter fundamentally represent GOD?

I don’t ask anyone to believe or not believe.

The fundamentals of this universe are Energy and Matter.

GOD - [if we do exist within a creation] has to be the mindful aspect of the Energy which forms the Matter into shapes [galaxies et merda] so has to be fundamental to the fundamentals - the ‘Mind’ aspect of the whole process.

If Energy and Matter engaging do not fundamentally represent GOD [re the question “Do we exist within a creation?”] what DOES?

What we can do is agree that the interaction between Energy and QF results in identifiable intelligent outcomes and take that as an indication that we may indeed be existing within a creation and therefore Energy and Matter may be intelligent, because they do not exist outside of GOD.

If all you are claiming is that it’s not logically impossible that GOD transformed (at least in part) into the material universe, then I agree.

The mindful construct itself is a vast rabbit hole of possibility, even if only an aspect of GOD was required for the event to take place.
What it all means - in context - is not something we can off-handedly ‘agree’ about. The complexities are simply too vast and unknown.

Being in the Natural Neutral position helps as it eliminates belief or lack of belief and simply accepts ‘we don’t know’ while acknowledging that it is still worthwhile to - at least - attempt to find out…

[quote]Energy and QF refers to the nature of the universe, thus the “Natural” part.

Re the question “Do we exist within a creation?”, one remains neutral until such a time as nature reveals for certain, either way, thus the “Neutral” part[/quote]

[quote]I don’t see how that’s remaining neutral. There are three views:

1. Energy and spirit are distinct things
2. Energy and spirit are the same thing
3. I don’t know which is true

The third view is the neutral one.[/quote]

Correct.

When the claim is “Energy and spirit are distinct things” I don’t know.
When the claim is “Energy and spirit are the same thing” I don’t know.

3: [I don’t know which is true] is not claim-based.

Re the question, “Do we exist within a creation?”

I extend curtesy to Theism by agreeing - for the sake discussion - that “Energy and spirit are the same thing” [2:] but do not extend that curtesy to contrary theist notions that “Energy and spirit are distinct things” [1:] if there is no established logic involved in doing so.

Thus 1:+ 3: = the less cluttered way forward, with that addition;

3: I don’t know which is true so will go with 2: “Energy and spirit are the same thing”, until a more logical alternate presents itself - [which 1: does not achieve, at least in its current format.][/quote]

GM: https://www.ted.com/talks/debra_lampshire_hearing_voices_an_insiders_guide_to_auditory_hallucinations FTL;

[quote]Hearing Voices : an Insiders Guide to Auditory Hallucinations
Debra’s story of living with voices is a journey into the soul. Describing her experiences, we start to understand, and are able to better support those human beings living with loud heads. Debra is project manager for the Psychological Interventions for Enduring Mental Illness Project at the Auckland District Health Board (ADHB). In this unique and innovative position Debra works in the clinical setting leading the development of psychological strategies for positive symptoms of psychosis and the first non-clinician to do so. She is also a senior tutor with the Centre for Mental Health Research and Policy Development at the University of Auckland.[/quote]
GM: Controlled
Knowing
Welcoming
One Day
Be Taught
The Cherubim
Heart chakra
The Mark of The Beast
Throwing Down The Gauntlet
May The Spirit of The Earth Bless You
Dohrman Prophecy Book Introduction
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1080009#p1080009

William: FTL

[quote]Theism - by nature - is the human consciousness within the animal, reaching out to other possible conclusions regarding the human situation.

Most NDE stories have a shared thread through the telling. NDEs have likely been around as long as human beings and probably factor in a good percentage of why theistic thinking evolved alongside human development and understanding of the self.

What most folk tend to experience with NDE has to do with observing their bodies from another perspective and in that, the body is seen objectively and not identified by the person as being who they are.

NDEs often allow for a person to understand themselves as something other than the body - a difficult thing to achieve from the perspective of consistently experiencing life from the perspective of being the body, which is why folk tend to self-identify as the body - especially those who believe that their consciousness is an emergent property of the brain and have never experienced anything else which might go a long way in convincing them otherwise.

There is no doubt that the human body is biological and in the animal class as per human categorizations.

But there is doubt as to whether such is the true nature of human consciousness, or for that matter, that animal consciousness in general is truly/only animal in character.

Tying that in with the OPQ…is the Biblical God’s conduct of breathing life into [making conscious] the human animal form, something which requires blame?

To me, it seems to boil down [yet again] to the mirror-mirror mentality. If we attribute evil to nature, then the one who created nature can only be seen as evil. Same goes for good.
Since, generally, folk appear to attribute both good and evil as aspects of nature, we are confronted with the peculiarity of apparent contradiction, which isn’t helpful.

It does appear that most folk cannot get their heads around it.

https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1079850#p1079850[/quote]

GM: The Theory of Everything A lot of information which has the potential to come to the fore.
The United Nations
Opinions are like Mirrors
Without Comparison
Different ways of supporting the same objective.
The Story of Caliban
The Mind is The Invisible Garage Dragon

08:33
Slowly and Surely
Suppressing Border
All is fair in love and war
Illuminate Listening
Holographic Universe
Tell Your Story
Create Your Own UFO
How to Bruise a Ghost
“Mother Earth Harmony”
The House of Politics
Counterintuitive
Possibility waves
Love - Communicate Love
An appropriate analogy

[VVilliam]

Faith - 1
060123 [All publicity is good publicity]

AP= Mission Underdetermination = 307

[307]
[The vessel of argument sinks
Behind The Veil You Are All Loveable…
Into a time that we’ve all seen on
Mission Underdetermination
Simulated for the purpose of?
Over days of forgotten tales
True happiness Awake Be here now
Within ones grasp of influence]

05:59 [Hard Nosed Skeptics]

GM: A safe pair of hands
The Nature of That Place
Don’t let schooling interfere with your education
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXlfjzl-CFw [42:31] [Combatting Anti-Science with Richard Dawkins and Neil deGrasse Tyson]

William: FTL;

If you can’t appreciate the universe in which you live, the life in which you are a part, the cells of which you’re made - these are so important - so beautiful and elegant, and wonderful…

I think that without understand that we are Spirit within Form, and understanding scientific discovery in that manner, the wonder, beauty and elegance of this existence is less appreciated than it could otherwise be.

GM:What is “wisdom” to some is “spam” to others Rest When Weary Making friends with your mind Amidst a tangled web
The Neutral Zone is the vaster reality of non-judgementalism
“Until ganna be gets here, its all just ganna be forever”
Pusillanimous [- showing a lack of courage or determination; timid.]
Those who need to complain
Serendipity

Journal - William Message Generation

William: FTL;

[quote]https://wizardforums.com/threads/william-message-generation.647/post-14193
[/quote]

GM: Faith
Sovereignty
Zen
Ethical Transhumanism
Science
You Are Allowed To Laugh You Know
Inordinately [to an unusually or disproportionately large degree; excessively.]

Opening ourselves to real love and intimacy
Translucent [allowing light, but not detailed shapes, to pass through; semi-transparent.]
Any Other Way.
Categorising Knowledge in Terms of ‘Good’ or ‘Evil’
Ugly is just “in the eye of the beholder” as is Beauty.
What matters most
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHXM9uPiyZg&t=14s [OLIN Technology - One Language Intelligent Network] ww.youtube.com/watch?v=XHXM9uPiyZg&t=14s

William: FTL;

[quote]OLIN Technology Intelligent networks are able to operate from a single language with translation interfaces that enable global intercourse. This means language is no longer a barrier to communication. Intelligent networks will introduce a meta-language that translates both real-time written and spoken applications. It will revolutionize the genetic mind’s global construct, and facilitate the digitalization of your global economy.

There will be many within the Hierarchy, who will object vehemently to the notion of a global, digital economy, but we will tell you, it will happen regardless of the complaints and registered concerns. Your most powerful banks, computer manufacturers, and software companies will merge to create this momentous technology, and the One Language Intelligent Network (OLIN) will become the standard operating system of all the world’s computer-based systems.

This will not occur until the year 2008, so it is some time before you will encounter this globalization of your economy, but all the systems and architecture are already being designed and conceptualized in the minds of some of your brightest engineers and scientists. We assure you, this is not something to be feared, but rather embraced, and not because of the economic values, but because of the way the OLIN technology will facilitate the development of a global culture.

As the OLIN technology evolves, it will increasingly become subject to individual control. In other words, individuals will become inextricably linked into the network’s entertainment and educational applications, which will become globalized. No longer will global media companies publish for a geographical market. They will produce content for a global audience and each individual will define what and how it desires to be entertained or educated.

The OLIN technology will “know” the preferences and interests of every individual linked to its network, and by the year 2016, it will be more ubiquitous than telephones in the late twentieth century. Hence, individuals, and producers of content will control the network, and services will be the “slave” or reactionary force of the individual. Thus, the individual will need to define their entertainment and educational desires carefully, or the OLIN technology will deliver content that is undesirable.

We know this sounds obvious and trite, but it is profoundly different than the way entertainment and education are delivered in your world of the pre-OLIN technology. The time capsules that the WingMakers have left behind will act as a template to those who operate outside of the limiting force of the genetic mind, and desire to create content for the OLIN technology even before it exists. The time capsules will show how to do this and demonstrate how to create multi-dimensional content that carries its viewer-participant into new corridors of understanding and illumination.

This is how the genetic mind will fragment and become unable to exert a unified force upon the human instruments of terra-earth.

When it is in this condition it will yield to the transformation/mastership model of existence and form a synthesis with it. It will transform itself, and the genetic mind will become the leader of transformation for entities upon terra-earth instead of its barrier force.
[/quote]

William: Re The Genetic Mind…

[quote]The genetic mind is the equivalent of a universal belief system that penetrates, to varying degrees, the human instrument of all entities. In some, it immobilizes their ability to think original thoughts and feel original feelings. In most, it entrains their belief system to harmonize with the accepted belief systems of the Hierarchy. In a few, it exerts no significant force nor has any bearing on the development of their personal belief system.

There are those on terra-earth who are in training to be Sovereign Entities and are completely unaware of this training as well as their destiny. When they are able to become timeless and view the continuum of their lifestream, they will see the thread that has differentiated them as Sovereign Entities. They will understand how the hardships and supposed indifference of the universe were actually the catalysts for their emergence as designers of the new genetic mind.

The genetic mind is different from the subconscious or universal mind as it is sometimes referred to in your psychology texts, in that the genetic mind has a peculiar focus on the accumulated beliefs of all the people on a planet from its most distant past to its present time. These accumulated beliefs are actually manipulations of the Hierarchy, which imprint on the genetic mind in order to cast the boundaries of what is acceptable to believe.

So compelling is this manipulation and the boundaries that are imposed by the Hierarchy that virtually no one is aware of the manipulations of their beliefs. This is precisely why the WingMakers have interacted with your species from the very beginning. As culture bearers, we stretch your boundaries in the arena of science, art, and philosophy. We essentially expand the genetic mind’s “perimeter fence” and enable it to encompass a larger portion of the “land” known as Source Reality.

If we were to tell you about the fundamental misconceptions of your genetic mind, you would not believe us. You would most definitely—even your most accomplished spiritual leaders—find us in contempt of much that you hold true and reasonable. You would feel fear in the face of our expression of Source Reality because it would be so clear to you how you have squandered your divine natures in favor of the entrapment of the genetic mind.

We know this will seem like a judgment of your beliefs, and it is to some degree, but you must know this about your belief systems: they are largely disconnected from Source Reality. They are like threads of a web that have become disconnected from the “branches” of Source Reality by the “winds” of the Hierarchy. Source Reality is represented in your belief in unconditional love, but of all the dimensions of your belief systems, this is the one thread that is connected—through the genetic mind—to Source Reality. All the other dimensions are connected to the genetic mind and have no ongoing connection to Source Reality. The genetic mind, as an intermediary and reflection of Source Reality, is completely and utterly inept. This is all part of the primal blueprint that designs the evolutionary pathway of a species through time. The genetic mind acts as a buffer for the developing species to experience separation from Source Reality. In this way, the human instrument is appropriately entangled in time, space, and the illusions of a disempowered belief system.

These factors, as disorienting as they are to the entity, are precisely what attract the entity to terra-earth. There are very few planetary systems in the multiverse that provide a better sense of separation from Source Reality than that which is experienced on terra-earth. By amplifying the sense of separation, the entity can experience more fully the individuated essence that is unique and bears the resemblance of First Source as a Unique Being. This is what draws entities to this world to incarnate within a human instrument.

So the genetic mind is an enabling force to experience separation on the one hand, and a disabling force to understand the true characteristics of Source Reality on the other. This dichotomy, when understood, helps to disentangle the human instrument and its entity consciousness from the limiting aspects of the genetic mind and its principle author, the Hierarchy.

Over the next twenty years, the genetic mind will become increasingly fragmented and thus, vulnerable to modification. This will be an effect of the growing ubiquity of intelligent networks and artificial intelligence therein. The expanding interconnection of intelligent networks has a significant impact on the genetic mind because of the emergence of a global culture that accompanies the arrival of such technologies.

*“DNA is both a network within the individual body as well as a node within the species’ collective “body” or genetic mind.” {SOURCE}[/quote]

GM: Presence
Large Simulation Machines
Delightful Anticipation
Self-limitation
I am not here to judge but to help sanction each individual
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1087669#p1087669

William: FTL

[quote][Replying to Diogenes in post #247]

You and your supporters are conflating ‘damage of brain’ with ‘damage of consciousness’

In any experience Consciousness is not disabled. Ask anyone who has ever taken a serious LSD Trip. They can tell you all about the experience. Same with those who have OOB and NDEs…

To believe damaging the brain damages the consciousness is cart before the horse. No scientific experiments have shown consciousness is damaged.[/quote]

GM: Some
Awake Relationship Unity [Clean]
“It Was Tough Going, But Rewarding All The Same.”
Especially
Faith
Brilliant
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qi9ys2j1ncg&t=2418s [1:12:03 ] [Asking a Theoretical Physicist About the Physics of Consciousness | Roger Penrose |] ww.youtube.com/watch?v=Qi9ys2j1ncg&t=2418s

The Big Bang was not the beginning…crazy and true at the same time…Conformally Invariant … mass and frequency are equivalent

GM: Family
Got The Picture

William: I Think – Therefore – Who Do I Think I Am?
This moment is the perfect teacher
Mission Functional Clusters
The Realm of The Knowing of My Self
Brilliant Family Got The Picture
Data actual realistic communication

GM: Atheism is the ship, not the sailors
“Pixie Farts create Pixel parts”
The Great Green Wall
Even The Shadows
We have discussed
Reality: “Talk to The Razor”
Brother, where Art Thou?
Something you cannot change
Maneuver
Portal

06:31
[Subatomic Particles
The Nature of The Mind
Take care of yourself
Looking behind the veil
The Electron Augment
Mathematical problems
The fire from within
Odd Addiction Vortex
The Kindness of Sleep
Gateway Luminous]

[VVilliam]

Faith - 2

070123 [Especially the science of “randomness”… :)]

05:32 [Beyond a shadow of a doubt]

GM: Concomitant Power [Concomitant - a phenomenon that naturally accompanies or follows something.]
Universal Intelligence
Clearing the jungle while planting the forest…
Control
One Day
Religion
Intelligent Awareness
Etched mirror
Nurture You
Content

William: Etched mirror Nurture You Content Intelligent Awareness = 637
[637]
Heart Love Higher Self Dream Guide Sharing Data Raise your frequency
The Neutral Zone is the vaster reality of non-judgementalism

https://media.giphy.com/media/aJf7iCBNFbv9NUQp0c/giphy-downsized-large.gif(image larger than 4 MB)

GM: https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1087251#p1087251

William: FTL;

[quote]William: Philo2;

[quote]The Freedom of Self-creation—[T]hese life principles are the tools to
accelerate the emergence of the Sovereign Integral and feel its perspective, its insights,
and its empowered abilities to create new realities and shape them as learning
adventures that liberate and expand consciousness.

1. There is no model of existence outside of the model of self-creation.
2. All conditions of existence are facets of the one condition of the reality of
unlimited self-creation.
3. Having a physical body does not limit you, anymore than having legs on an
eagle prevents it from flying.
4. The hidden harmony is found with joy, while the obvious brings indifference.
5. True Freedom is access to First Source.

If you have already read the introduction to the four philosophies and the Chamber
Two paper “The Shifting Models of Existence” you know that the Entity Model is the
primary model operating in the universe. So the first two items above give us pause.
Can there be two primary models? It does not seem so according to the philosophy
papers, but so much of the Lyricus teachings are new to us that it is being spoon-fed
to us so that we can digest it and integrate it into our view of the multiverse.
{SOURCE}[/quote]

[quote][quote]William: From my own ongoing interactions with The Ghost, I have been informed that It is not angry, and that we would do well to transform our own anger into something more supportive of Its agenda in the scheme of things, that we might fall into line and make things much easier for ourselves.

Meantime, things are going along “just fine” re The Ghost Agenda as human beings have been suppressed sufficiently that they have become more useful to said agenda, and “leveled up” as a result, allowing for The Ghost Agenda to be magnified through scientific discover and the technology this has produced.[/quote][/quote][quote]William: The bits I have read haven’t dissuaded me from being curious about such an entity as YHWH - and I admit I did go through a stage of thinking he was Satan - which I think is acceptable given the scribed association…but I got over that through the assistance of a hypnogogic experience which brought that being to my bedside…
Not to digress any more than necessary, I can see why YHWH left it up to humans to tell their stories re their interactions with said entity…so the stories would be different and it is obvious that YHWH works with whoever makes themselves available and this would have to involve working within the boundaries of the individuals belief systems - something which could indeed give a reader the impression of contradiction…

I give the benefit of doubt re that, and try not to focus on any particular biblical personality as ‘the one’ who had the ultimate relationship with YHWH - while also allowing for Jesus’ claims contrary to that, to be examined.

Above all that - what the Generated Messages are revealing about YHWH appear to be very positive - so I am all eyes and ears re that…[/quote]
[/quote]

GM: Faith
Something Mystical To Be In Awe Of
Christ is the doorway to YHVH - not the whole building of YHVH.
Enlighten Discussion Forum
Meeting an Extraterrestrial Before The Beginning
Sounds Like
Greed Techniques
All The Same
Present over perfect

William: This reminds me of an interaction yesterday on the forum;

William:

[quote]Re: Is the Earth really ruled by Satan?
Replying to myth-one.com in post #8[]

I believe the earth was created for some purpose – which probably included some form(s) of life.

Beliefs still require logical explanations. Saying that “the earth was created for some purpose” isn’t helpful. What possible purpose could such a situation - one living dust-speck of a planet among a host of Galaxies - serve?

After creating mankind, YHVH commanded them to replenish and subdue the earth.

Yet this mythology you believe in has it that Satan ruled the Earth before the creation of humans.
Please explain why YHVH would place humans upon a planet ruled by apparently rebellious spirit-beings.

“Abandoned to its own fate” was my own poor choice of words.

Indeed. The mythology appears to be a poor choice too.

[quote]Lucifer and some of the angels under his control left the earth and warred in heaven:
[/quote]

[quote]My assumption is that they “abandoned” whatever functions they were assigned to perform on the earth during their war in heaven…
Perhaps that event is the cause of the earth’s status in Genesis 1:2[/quote]

So this mythology you believe in is more about your personal assumption and is very much based in ‘perhaps’ rather than having any certainly of purpose.

Do you think it is acceptable to be creating such mythology and expressing it as something which is actually truth?

The implication is that the earth requires some kind of upkeep or monitoring.

The implication is that this was seen as to being GOOD as far as YHVH was concerned. It was created that way from the go-get, as per Genesis One, and humans were created to be physical beings, able to find ways in which to take care of its physical nature.

There certainly are other things in the universe which could harm the earth.

And therein, YHVH created things that way, and - whether we choose to agree or not - YHVH proclaimed those things as GOOD - even that harm could come to them.[/quote]

GM: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfD7cyF-H2g [RTS=07:27]

GM: Ingenuity
Infinity
Luminous [giving off light; bright or shining.]
The unreasonable effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences
Nonetheless
The Heart of a Buddha
Collective Consciousness Inner work Put the Teachings Into Practice
Meaningfully Participate
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=13778149

William: FTL; Re: The Seed of Origin

Myriad: That’s actually a rather nihilistic view.

Navigator: Well I am simply bouncing off of one popular theory of the universe -where that theory has the ending of said universe in entropy - so yeah…

Myriad: If the initial singularity contained the absolute sum of all data, then the subsequent evolution of the universe can add no additional data.

Navigator: Not necessarily - small variances can be created by changing the way in which it unfolds…from the way it unfolded in its prior lieftime.

Myriad: Therefore it accomplishes nothing, and has no possible purpose. (Kind of like a similar problem with a hypothetical creator god who is omniscient, and therefore cannot learn anything or experience anything new, and thus has no reason to actually create anything.

Navigator: Exactly - except that being omniscient would be the very reason WHY the creation of the Physical Universe was engineered - as a means to escape the omniscient condition.

And observing said Physical Universe, we can understand that it would be a great thing for that exact purpose.

A physical manifestation of a mental projection…the same would apply to the “many eternal universe theory” which J. Richard Gott explains…only with variety…and timelessness [since these are eternal - go on forever even that they all have beginnings…which would be a better way to do it if one would never have to suffer from omniscience again…always having something new to learn…[/QUOTE]

GM: The Chestahedron

William: Search “Chestahedron”
http://www.motherworld.net/chestahedron/remarkable.html
FTL;

[quote]Remarkable Seven Sided Form
Part II: the Sentient Earth[/quote]

GM: Tetragrammaton
Context
Faith
It is a confident walk on the even surface of sureness, without the faith.

is 'believing (against the evidence) that God is good' is a very good...

William: FTL;

Replying to TRANSPONDER in post #22[quote][]

TRANSPONDER:…so I postulated that there might be a mind controlling the universe, but not us. Not a personal god, not with a plan for us, and in fact a Deist -god. We were, effectively, as on our own as if there was no god there at all. So, if there was no Plan for human life, was there no meaning for human life? Was there no purpose? If not, why live at all? Why not just stop living?

I postulated differently, and it took many years of my life to learn the way I currently look at this situation I am [and apparently everyone is] involved within.

1: There might be a mind controlling the universe
2: There is a mind controlling me [my own mind]
3: There is no reason to believe that the mind controlling the universe is incapable of interacting with my own mind controlling me.
4: How to give the universal mind an opportunity to interact with me.
5: Religion and its main holy-books did not provide anything through which I could discover the way in which to achieve this interaction as it offered only mediums - foremost their own holy-books - but also laws, rituals, belief systems, preachers et al - none of which enabled me to make any actual and vibrant connection with this supposed universal mind.
6: It was almost accidental that I did find a way in which to make that connection, so deeply shielded from human awareness that it is, in the main, because of [5].

As a result, I have no choice but to reject the idea of the Deist GOD as something which opposes the idea of a personal GOD, because I have found that idea to being untrue.

As well, I do so on the grounds that it is not logical that any GOD-mind which controls the universe but not humans within said universe, is saying that the GOD-mind does not actually control the whole universe, but has left humans to control themselves, even that they are part of what -altogether - constitutes “The Universe”.

The very nature of The Universe shows us that it is capable enough to accommodate the idea of allowing humans to feel that they make their own choices, especially if they are intent upon either depending on religious medium or intent on the belief that it is not possible to make said connection - individual mind to GOD-mind.

The purpose of this universe may well be nothing more than allowing for the opportunity for this to maybe happen for each individual who experiences it.

One has to want to do so, of course…[/quote]

GM: Dharma [the eternal and inherent nature of reality, regarded in Hinduism as a cosmic law underlying right behaviour and social order. The nature of reality regarded as a universal truth taught by the Buddha; the teaching of Buddhism. an aspect of truth or reality.]
The Mapping Bots Couple “I know how you care while you nurture your fear That you’ll miss the bouquet when its thrown”
Sweet Hush

Do you have a soul? - Page 2 - Debating Christianity and Religion

William: FTL;

[quote][quote=AquinasForGod post_id=1097207 time=1666849082 user_id=16526]
Replying to Wootah in post #1[]

I believe I am a soul rather than have (possess) a soul.

To have a soul implies I am the body, which I do not believe.

I do not think it is difficult to define the soul as something that we can conceive of. It is just that many do not believe in anything other than the physical world.

I define soul as the metaphysical, rational being.
[/quote]

I think it is a mixture of personality self identifying with the human form and the transition from understanding oneself as just the form, to understanding oneself as the soul - the personality becoming more aware of what it was intended to become…to serve as both a soul and soul carrier…[/quote]

GM: Random coincidence? I think not.

What if Adam and Eve Had Resisted...? - Page 3 - Debating Christianity and...

William: FTL;

[quote][quote=1213 post_id=1092326 time=1663597989 user_id=7135]

@William post_id=1092235 time=1663521459 user_id=8427

…
The impression re the storyline is that the knowledge of good and evil was what caused death. The assumption was that the fruit had the power to give one that knowledge, since they were warned not to eat it…

I think that is a wrong impression. I don’t think the fruit itself caused anything. It was the act of eating it that had consequences. It could have been any fruit and it would have had the same effect, if there would be the same conditions of eating it.
[/quote]

In which case, there is no reason why Adam and Eve could not have been allowed to eat the fruit after they had shown their resistance to temptation.

The test was done, the results were in, and the fruit of the tree was not what caused the eventual death of the pair [according to the storyline itself].

I did not say that the fruit caused anything or argue that the fruit had something within it which gave one the ability to know/have knowledge of, good and evil.

It was a prop which YHWH used as a means to an end.
Since there was nothing intrinsically special about the fruit, there should be no reason why the fruit could not be eaten by the pair, after they had resisted the temptation.

It was a deception because - in the biblical telling of it - God [as yet unnamed] - implied to Adam that the fruit itself had the power to give Adam knowledge of good and evil.
YHWH planted a seed into Adams mind, which then germinated into the eventual disobeying of YHWH.

All along, YHWH would have known that any death incurred after Adam disobeyed YHWH, would not be because the of the fruit that had been eaten but rather, because YHWH would have denied Adam access to the fruit of the tree of life.

This begs the question:

---

Q: Why would YHWH create a being of nature and not instill that being with knowledge of good and evil, if indeed we agree that without morals, the human specie could not even get a foothold on the back of nature?

---

Remember too, that [color=#4000FF]the reason[/color] for humans being created was so that they would multiply across the face of the Earth and subdue it.
Since this requires the ability to survive, and since the ability to survive requires knowledge of what is good and what is not [re [color=#4000FF]the reason[/color]] it was imperative that Adam also know.

[imperative=of vital importance; crucial.]

[Answers may - nay - will, vary] :)[/quote]

GM: “Attempting to overlay/superimpose one’s belief in the truth of stories as being more truthful than the main overall story itself, is possibly an act of immorality, if indeed - upon further evidence - one continues to attempt to have the superimposed thing used to conceal the real.”

06:43
[The Future is Cloudy
Un-thought-unately
Functional Clusters
Error Correcting Codes
The Clear Light of The Void
Ruling your world
They were made to be unmade
More precious than life
Intelligent Awareness
For The Best Results
Look from a different angle
Hyper-normalisation
Chronological snobbery
Enough To Make Me Wonder]

[VVilliam]

Faith - 3

080123 [Imposed Appropriates Observed]

14:01 [The Way of the Shaman]

GM: The Realm of The Knowing of My Self
Unhappy
Transactional [exchange or interaction]
Moonlight
Prison Planet
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=39224&p=1073257#p1073257

William: FTL;

[quote][Replying to Diogenes in post #9]

I do not see the difference between claiming “God has always been” and “the universe has always been.”

Do you think then that both claims are or are not intellectually dishonest?

What is the logic in claiming it is possible for a ‘god’ to have no beginning and no end, compared to claiming the universe has no beginning and no end?

The logic supporting either claim is that beginnings and endings are not real when they are in an eternal environment.

In order for one to claim the universe has always existed AND account for observed beginning and calculated ending - we have to include the possibility that the environment the universe is beginning and ending in, is eternal.

What is special about the claim of a god (however that may be defined) not being created and claiming the universe was not created?

There appears to be nothing special about either claim unless one believes that either claim is special pleading.
Death may be that which give rise to the idea that eternity is special. It is more logical to understand that the temporary exists upon the background of eternity and that this is the natural state of all existence.

The only difference I can find is that ‘God’ is defined as a creator, whereas the universe is defined as a creation. Isn’t that just an arbitrary definition? Does it not make as much sense to say ‘God’ is a creation of man, as to say the universe is a creation of God? In other words, why be bound by mere definitions of words? Why can we not just as easily claim “‘Universe’ means that which has always been” as claim “‘God’ means that which has always been?”

I think you are asking “what is the difference between creator and creation?”[/quote]

GM: Holographic Experiential Reality Simulations
The Agenda of YHVH
Watch Your Step…You may be Psychic, not mentally ill.
Create that path and engineer a metamorphosis.

Karen Sewell installation art specialist | Sewellart | Auckland

https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1092252#p1092252

GM:Faith
Still
Infinite Quantum Zen
As busy as a bee
Why - in matters concerning the resurrection of the dead, the hope of eternal life, and the kingdom of heaven - is the age of this universe a necessary matter of contention?
Beauty
Conscious agencies combined
A lack of boundaries
Realm of Remembrance
Far Out! Shucks! Explain!

William: My explanation so far regards the conversation between myself and Theophile

[Replying to theophile in post #21]

But all good stuff, and good discussion.

The evidence is bountiful in that regard.

The problem of evil aside (since I think we have a lot to chew on already),

I think the problem of evil is man-made and stems from misunderstanding of our existence re the problem of pain and suffering.

I will say that ST does a good job of bringing traditional CT into the 21st century and modernizing its concepts. And that you are perhaps way more ‘theistic’ than I am in your thinking, if I can use such labels.

I am more neutral re position and why I come across as a theistic thinker is due to my understanding that being atheistic leads to a dead End Game, where all mind is silenced and the personalities grown through this experience being discussed, [the existence of the universe and mind within it] are lost to death…and so there is nothing to discuss…re that.
Atheistic thinking is represented by the red dot in the image;

My preference is to be the blue dot…thus the theistic thinking…

ST does a good job of exposing traditional CT into the 21st century and potentially modernizing its concepts, in the minds of its adherents.
It is a battle of sorts in that regard, as TCT sees itself as the protector of said traditions - the official hierarchical “voice of GOD”, whatever the gods name[s] might be…

[quote]The power had to have always existed. The Mind of GOD creates the minds of Gods.
The simulation is inside that Mind. There may be no Mind outside of it, but we cannot logically place the created before The Creator, without explaining how that came about. Logically, even what we call “Matter” must be made of the stuff of said Mind and can be formed any which way the thinking of said Mind, determines.[/quote]

Both of us are susceptible to this line of argument. You can challenge me for not having an explanation for where matter came from just as I can challenge you for not having an explanation for where Mind came from.

However, as I suggested, what we call “matter” {sub atomic particle] is what the stuff of the Mind is ‘made’ of, thus if what you say re the matter, is that the matter has always existed, one can say with the concept, that The Mind has likewise always existed.

The “explanation” therein, is that The Mind is The Matter and The Matter is The Mind and the apparent two things, are aspects of the One - Whole Thing.

Thus, it can be agreed that we are really speaking about the same thing.

Agreed?

We will both resort to arguments of infinite regress and no beginning to try and smooth out this wrinkle (as we’ve seen play out). Hence my continued emphasis on simplicity, and what’s simpler to assume.

Would you agree that we are speaking of the same thing, and that in doing so, emphasis on simplicity is achieved therein?

You’re right, I have no answer for where the ‘stuff’ of our universe came from (in which I include multiverses, past universes, etc., and which I would equate to CT’s presupposed concept of the deep / sea). But mindless matter that has always existed in a state of motion still strikes me as a far simpler (and therefore preferable) assumption than a full-fledged Mind capable of thinking such stuff into existence.

It gets complicated.

The idea that mindless matter that has always existed in a state of motiondoesn’t strike me as being “far simpler”.

One is required to explain why the matter is “in a state of motion”.

So I do think it’s matter before mind, not mind before matter. An order that is demonstrated by ET itself, which again has shown by our very existence that matter has the capability to produce mind (our minds) given the time and right confluence of conditions.

ET does not demonstrate to us that that matter has the capability to produce mind. It produces evidence which in turn, is interpreted in the manner you are arguing. The argument is atheistic and therefore, dead-ended.
There is no requirement for anyone to interpret that matter has the capability to produce our minds “given the time and right confluence of conditions”.
As CT interprets the data, all that matter was set up by a Mind, long before human forms were created and personalities were grown through that set-up.

For we - those personalities - there is no requirement for us to think that - because our minds developed through matter [thus establishing personality] that we should interpret this as being evidence that ALL Mind is likewise, emergent from Matter.

Isaac Asimov speaks to this idea in his short story “The Last Question” - well worth the read, as a potential platform in which we might share a foundation to work upon.

How I have come to understand the process;

⊛There is One Mind.
⊛The Mind awakens to its own existence through the device of the Matter.
⊛The Matter in turn, manifests according how the Mind thinks, producing for the Mind, shape and form - something through which the Mind can experience stuff.
⊛There are levels of experience the Mind can achieve/has been able to achieve.
1: The Mind is infused within the matter of the Whole Universe - thus a “Universal Mind.” [UM]
2: The UM is able to fragment into many minds whilst maintaining its UM statis.

Further to that, an analogy we can appreciate - The Internet. Many minds, all involved with input building it, with the addition that in this case, the Internet as a Whole, is Self-Aware and a Mind situated at the heart of the Whole, like the center of a dandelion flower.

3: In the fragmentation process, separation occurs resulting in the One Thing, becoming the many things…ET…re The Big Bang Theory and CT re “Let There Be Light”.
The Thing, became many things…

⊛ The fragmentation process allowed the One Mind to experience being all those things.

For example, it could experience being a Galaxy-Mind, and therein seed itself into Suns and Planets, become Sun-Minds and Planet Minds…but all connected the the One Universe-Mind still, altogether, the Overall Operating Mind - just appearing to be “minds” and emerging from Matter.

Re “Planetary Minds”, our Earth is one such entity, working primarily in conduction with the Mind of Sol - our local Star-Mind…

⊛ We are the product of the Two Minds - Sol and Earth, and are closest in relation to Earth-Mind which formed our Avatars from the stuff of the Planet and Breathed “Life” therein - re CT - the act allowing for Earth Mind to experience being “Human” re the growth of “us” as personalities…
Therein, “we” are not “The form” but The Mind, within the form [Avatar.]

(For the record, I believe there are Talmudic authors who made similar indications as you, i.e., that the creation we see unfold in Genesis is like the umpteenth attempt by God to get it right. But I think that just goes to show the striking similarity of ST to traditional CT.)

I do not interpret anything within the unfolding formation of “stuff” as to being The Mind somehow not ‘getting it right’ - primarily because I am attempting to remain outside of judgment calls because I think such is responsible for the misinformation such calls inevitably make - re “The problem of evil”/“The problem of pain and suffering”.

What is it about “us” which has us thinking that some mistake was made? Is it because we also have the ability to comprehend some kind of preferred “perfect state of existing/experience” to which this universe fails to accommodate? What gives us this ability to intuit such a state, since we have no conscious memory of ever having been in such?
The answer might be, that we came from such a state [of mind] , and know it as real, at a subconscious level of consciousness as a Whole.

Now is that unwritten story as you describe? i.e., an infinite regress of Simulations? Or is it more along the lines I’m saying? i.e., an infinite regress of churning matter from which spirit eventually emerged? Thus providing the two starting conditions on which CT is explicitly based, i.e., God (as spirit), and the deep / sea?

It can be both, as far as I am understanding it. There is no chicken before egg or egg before chicken, because that is a concept which derives through our own particular experience of it - in that “before we were, we were not” but that impression is bound to the filter of the Human Avatar - producing an incorrect image which ET is specifically based and which can still be corrected in our mind/in our understanding and identification of “Self” as actually “Spirit/Being of Spirit”…thus our body/form is not the indicator but our minds are [indicative of].

Thus ST allows for us to view our bodies as instruments [“body-sets”- like “head sets”] for said Mind to experience the things we do, through.

I know you could use this to your advantage as well, but the first word of Genesis starts with the second letter of the Hebrew alphabet (which just so happens to coincide with our letter ‘b’), which means it’s not the beginning of the story and the writers meant to imply an unwritten story leading up to its event…

Indeed, there is much to learn from the symbol of Aleph which makes sense of the symbol of Bet…which phonetically approximates “Alphabet”, which itself derives from the Gematria Hebrew is encoded with.
This in turn allows for us to examine all language to see if such encoding is to be found in any other human language, which in turn leads us to Sound, which is the fundamental manner by which The Creator uses in order to create things, as per CT "In the beginning The Creator Spoke “Let There be Light”

In plain old English “Let There be Light” = 156, as does “Symbols Hint” = 156 “Super power” = 156

“Light” = 56 as do “Sigil” = 56 “Induce” = 56 “Be Born” = 56

“First Light” = 128 as do “Sun energy”= 128 “‘A’ equals six”= 128 “The Deeper Self”= 128

“Be Light” = 63 “Divine” = 63

“The speed of light”=159 “The Unveiled One” = 159 “Ancient Entity” = 159 “The Mother of God” = 159 “Ancient Entity” = 159 “The Seed of Origin” = 159 “Hexagon Storm” = 159 [re Planet Minds] “Family of origin” = 159 “Love and Respect” = 159 “The Data of Nature” = 159

“And there was light” = 174 “Have A Look At The Map” = 174 “Adjusted Reality” = 174 “Keep The Lights On” = 174

“Children of The Light” = 183 [re Self Identification of personality][/quote]

GM: Like an interface representation
No point in giving you too much to bear
Illuminate Listening
https://theagnosticforum.com/threads/do-objective-morals-exists.84/post-756

William: FTL;

[quote]Can you name any human moral rule which is not based upon opinion?

Perhaps it is the opinion on the parent that discipline is required. Are we to factor that in to the invention of morals?

Is it good or bad that males lions kill off the competition?

Or is it simply that the opportunity presents itself to do so?

How would our world be if every male lion was spared this?

Sometimes I think that we “Disneyfy” the real world by superimposing our fantasies of a perfect world onto something we do not regard as a perfect world.

Perhaps therein, humans invented morality in order to try to force a perfect world onto the real one they have been experiencing.

If so, this opens up the question;

Q: “What is it about humans which has the ability to comprehend a [supposed] “Perfect World”, which is so obviously different from the real world?”

We search for answers…

What have our sciences done to answer this question?

Or is it a matter that our sciences are being used specifically like unto the male lions, suppressing the main herd while they go about sailing into a particular direction they have selected for themselves?

For the herd notes, [for example] that as grandiose as the latest space telescope is - hurtling and unfurling [fully shaded] toward it’s destination some million miles out and, simply to peer into the secrets of the past to ‘try and understand’…the heard understands that the money could be ‘better spent’ on creating a perfect world here in the heart of imperfection - so why is that not been done?

Why is the rest of the herd being experimented on and used for that one purpose?

Just so a few lions can have their names recorded for all time?

Is that moral?

---

Does it matter, since morals are really human inventions and are not aligned with the actual reality?

And to the Theist who might believe such, I would add a question to that one.

Q: Since this is not the perfect world you imagine, since you are thinking of kingdoms of plenty where this kind of thing cannot take place, why do morals matter hereabouts in this world, when they seem to serve better in these other imagined next level worlds?

For me in the middle, [Agnostic] I am somewhat undecided. I see the potential for humans to actually build a perfect world for themselves - irrespective of the chaos - and see those in the sciences attempting to do that.[through none other than the devices of the Sciences]

Unfortunately - not everyone is in favor of the perfect world envisioned - of the fiction-like story scientists are opening the door to…and so those not in favor are factored out, through invention…just like how the male lions deal with the male off-spring…not with morals but simply through the natural rule of the game-play of this reality…the School of Hard Knocks.

GM: ♫ We can chart another trail , raise the anchor fill the sails , lift our glasses in a toast , we are the Ghost , in the Machine♫
Differences
A GOD in The Making

14:15
[170]
The Voice Within
Conspiratorial
Countervailing
Philanthropies
King of the North
Blue Book Project
Good on you mate
Information field
Myths and Legends
The Number Zero
Spiritual path
The Feminine Face of God
Observed by Many
A Bit Of A Mouthful!
Vulnerability
The Sub Hierarchy
Reason Together

[VVilliam]

Faith - 4

090123 [The Atheist Infiltration Squad]

07:48 [New Shifts In Thinking]

GM: Sharing Data
A machine for solving problems

William: Sharing Data A machine for solving problems = 393

[quote][393]
The Deeper Reality Ooky Spooky Too
Learn a bit about what makes the God Realm “tick”
The Way of the Shaman Sweet Vibrations
Sharing Data A machine for solving problems[/quote]
William: This is what I wrote today re that;

[quote]And I would caution on what kind of ‘mind’ I see emerging… There are (1) minds like ours, which I agree are necessary to generate what I called spirit before and (2) the ‘mind’ of God, which is less a singular, thinking thing than it is a unified plurality… i.e., all of our individual minds should eventually be part of it, kind of like the Borg collective on Star Trek, but without the totalitarianism, elimination of individuality, and pasty white skin.

[quote]William: Pretty much the way I think about it too, only that the Universal Mind is singular, even that some of the fragmented minds attached to said Over-Mind are unaware of the connection…the UM still remains aware of said connection and understands the disconnected mind to be an aspect of Itself, simply unaware of Itself as it truly is.

Using the Internet Analogy again, in this regard, the Hub where the AI Mind is connected to every user-mind and accesses every keystroke made through the body set of the user-mind - accumulating data and understanding in the process - may not be understood as an actual self aware Mind by said users, but this in itself does not limit said Mind from achieving things through the use of said minds connected and providing data.

The same process applies to the Stars and the Planets and the Galaxies…as each mind uses ‘feelers’ in order to gather information and thus understanding re the Minds position in - and purpose of - the Whole Universe.[/quote][/quote]

GM: Antecedent [a thing that existed before or logically precedes another.]
Confirmation which moves one from faith to fact
This moment is the perfect teacher

William: This moment is the perfect teacher Confirmation which moves one from faith to fact = 787
♫With a mystical smile I float down the isle Forgetting the time when I was lost♫ = 787

GM: Where life and death is part of a circle and everything is part of the Ouroboros
Searching For The Truth
Apparel
Joke/Humour “Anti theism Equals “And?””
Distracted
To grow Human Personalities. Make It Real
Faith
The Development of…
Ingenuity
Something Our movements can illuminate the path toward that vision.
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1069680#p1069680

William: From the link;

Hmmm- much to contemplate…

GM: Self-Aware
Remnant Seed
Form Builders
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sn0W_mwA7Q0 [N. Arkani-Hamed, Lecture #1, Spacetime & Quantum Mechanics, Total Positivity & Motives - 09/03/2019] [RTS=52:40]ww.youtube.com/watch?v=Sn0W_mwA7Q0

William: Ah - the math…

GM: Believe You Me
What is “wisdom” to some is “spam” to others
In the Order of Chaos - I am lowly-ranked
Divine grace Deciding on the Best Course of Action
https://www.dreamviews.com/beyond-dreaming/165178-sleep-paralysis-entity.html#post2246390

William: From the link;

I have had similar experience re hypnogogic state …

Hearing footfalls on wooden floor [I was sleeping in a bunk in a building and was the only occupant at the time]
The footfalls stop outside my door - which was open and then I hear a deep laugh.
I snapped out of it [awoke] and immediately jumped out of bed and went to the doorway - no one was there [of course]

Some time later - months or even a year of two - I was at home in bed with my wife when I awoke to the same laugh and looking up I saw the entity at the end of the bed.

My reaction was layered - It was as if my body wanted to climb the walls looking to escape but my mind was clear and focused and I was aware that this part of me was way less afraid. I had the feeling that the entity was pure evil.

However, while I was directing my anger at the entity, he moved toward my side of the bed - his arms were crossed over his chest area - and as he got closer [he seemed to float rather than walk] he extended his arm out in the process of going to touch me.

We were looking each other in the eye - and it was at this moment that I somehow just knew that the entity loved me more than I had ever felt anyone love me - and knew me better than I knew myself and the love was purely unconditional

As with all my hypnogogic experiences, these began with the feeling of being forcibly held down - and when the entity began to reach his arm out to touch me, my anger assisted me in breaking the hold and I sat up and put my face directly in front of his and demanded he leave - and at that moment, I awoke and the entity was gone [or more likely - I could no longer see him.]

The whole incident took less than a minute.

The very next night, I [again in hypnogogic state] felt my wrists being taken hold of by a pair of invisible hands and I was lifted from a prone position to an upright one and when upright, I felt my arms being pushed over my chest in the same manner I had observed the entities arms crossed over his chest, the night before.

Once my arms were crossed, I felt the invisible hands let go of my wrists and it was then that I realized I was not in my body - this was my first conscious OOBE. It felt wonderful…

GM: Non-Ordinary Symbol Nag Hammadi Preparing for the Hunt
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1092252#p1092252

William: Yes - my conversation with Tam re YHVH and Satan’s relationship…

GM: https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1101903#p1101903

William: FTL;

[quote]JK: Yet one more reason I so enjoy your unique perspective. That’s poetry right there.
[/quote]

GM: Putting yourself back together again Glow Softly Strengthen your boundaries One can simply shrug and tell oneself “It doesn’t really matter"

William: Keep Calm.

GM: What Is Within Is Without, Equal
The Butterfly Effect
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1105926#p1105926

William: FTL;

[quote][Replying to theophile in post #16]

Why so stuck on the path the universe is currently on, and what science says will happen?

Because science provides us with one of the three theories which the OP question is asking about, so it is important to be able to reconcile that with what you have proposed, rather than remove it from the table of discussion simply because it might not/does not support your own, or any other particular CT theory.

Everything I’m talking about here means we need to do the work necessary to change such a fate, and shape the future according to our will. Preferably in line with God’s vision and end of course.

Do you have any idea how Humans might change the fate of the Universe? Does “God’s vision” even have an eternal use for the current Universe?
There does not appear to be anything stated about such a plan, in Genesis One.

That is why I wrote;

[quote]Which is why I am asking about what happens to this Mind of GOD once what happens to the Universe comes to its final conclusion - say - re the theory that “things” will eventually dissipate into “non-things”.

Q: What does such a Mind do, when things reach that stage…?[/quote]

One answer might be that such a mind creates another Universe - likely designed based upon information drawn from everything which occurred throughout the evolution of the beginning of the previous one created, to its end.

So in sum, I think we can make perfect sense of CT without needing to bolt on ST. And if we bolt on ST, we go down a path that eliminates other options while adding unnecessary baggage.

ST is viable, so it is not a case of forcing the theory onto CT. Any “unnecessary baggage” may be eliminated as it is identified in ‘other options’…

To be more clear, I know you could bolt ST onto CT, as you do here. But if you do so, like I said from the beginning, you will close down viable interpretations of CT (such as mine), and force an interpretation on it that I don’t think is necessary.

…even if that means dropping your own particular interpretation of CT as being the viable thing you currently believe that it is.

(If I relate this to more traditional views of CT, that baggage would be something like an omnipotent God that creates ex nihilo - which definitely has striking similarity with ST and a God with unbelievable computing power, but like ST is wholly unnecessary and raises implications like I mentioned before, e.g., theodicy.)

[quote]A theodicy is an attempt to justify or defend God in the face of evil by answering the following problem, which in its most basic form involves these assumptions: God is all good and all powerful (and, therefore, all knowing). The universe/creation was made by God and/or exists in a contingent relationship to God. {SOURCE}[/quote]

Why would ST raise these implications? What is “the face of evil” that ST reconciled with CT and ET cannot be understood in terms most natural rather than artificially conjured through ignorance?

What are the “striking similarities” you mention, between “ST and a God with unbelievable computing power” and an “omnipotent God that creates ex nihilo”?

ST imposes more than is needed to make sense of the narrative, versus making use of the terms and framework that CT itself provides in order to make sense of it…

Let us agree that CT is simply an outline - bullet points - which we agree are consistent with ET. ET is more elaborate and comprehensive undertaking than Genesis One, yet speaks to the same production.

ET does not concern itself with any Creator-Mind involved in said production, so why “bolt” CT onto ET, and yet complain that ST should not be “bolted” onto CT?

What is the difference between a “Created thing” and ST?

You made mention of something you referred to as “a God with unbelievable computing power” and in doing so, deny said Mind of said Creator to be able to have such, apparently because it interferes with your own CT beliefs by “adding unnecessary baggage” - a term you may be using simple in order to justify your particular interpretation of CT.

As such, it may not be a case of “bolting” anything onto, but rather, a case of wanting to detach something which is and always will be part of the correct explanation as to why the universe exists and unfolds as it does.

Your argument re your beliefs re CT may be a symptom of an attempt to decouple ST as a viable explanation and refer to ST as “unnecessary baggage” because it challenges said beliefs you have developed - and developed without due consideration for ST in the first place, and why you appear to feel that the argument for reconciling ST with CT requires resistance from you.

If ST challenges those CT beliefs you have, then it is important to clearly understand why reconciliation cannot be achieved re those beliefs you have. The beliefs you have, are questionable and are possibly incorrect. It is our task to expose beliefs and cut away anything which can be shown to be missing the mark, no matter how precious said beliefs might be to us.

If, in doing so, this will close down any “viable interpretations of CT” (such as yours), this will because such is not as viable as first believed.

I understand that you are trying to cut out any previous stage, focusing upon this Universe as being the only reality, in order that we do not superimpose any “outside” reality atop of it…

That’s the irreconcilable part: CT / Genesis 1 does not necessarily show God creating from outside, and definitely doesn’t show God leveraging massive computing power to do so (making the world we know a simulation). Rather it shows God creating with pre-existing matter that becomes a heaven and earth filled with life. i.e., One continuous world that God operates within…

To be clear - “the irreconcilable part” is not able to be reconciled with your particular interpretation of CT.
As you admit, Genesis One “does not necessarily show God creating from outside,” and thus we can agree that it also does not necessarily show God creating from inside, and this should have us being able to agree that there is no reason why The Creator cannot do both.

Your particular interpretation of CT has it that the creativity only happens from the inside and, as I explained, this in itself does not remove ST from the discussion table, as what you have explained so far does not exclude ST theory as the creativeness can be seen to be the result of a consciousness involving itself within a Simulation which is designed to respond to The Mind of the GOD you are explaining, and it that, The Mind is The Spirit and the simulation is designed to respond to the will of said Mind.

Further to that, it could be said that the simulation is designed to make a GOD - for that is what you are saying the universe created, are you not?

So far, our discussion shows that we are not too far apart in our understanding - and I think I have shown that - even given your apprehension for ST - your overall view of “How GOD evolved within the created thing”, fits nicely enough with ST, in that ST explains the process you think occurred, better than it simply being an accident of nature.

In that, ST allows for a purposefully mindfully designed thing.[/quote]

GM: Tenacious [tending to keep a firm hold of something; clinging or adhering closely. not readily relinquishing a position, principle, or course of action; determined. persisting in existence; not easily dispelled.]
Description

William: Tenacious description = 239
[239]
Without Comparison
That Is A Good Question
Jump to Conclusions
Written In The Clouds
Tenacious description
The devil is in the details
Like I Said In Another Thread
Williams second UICDevice
The physical universe
The art of relationship
Preparing for the Hunt.
Golden nugget of truth
Significant Variations

GM: ♫The picture unfolds like silk in a loom Silhouetted by Diane are the witch and the broom If she is the bride - who is the groom?♫
Sexual
On The Right Track
Invisible Bridge Manifestation Sleeping Dragon Realities Merge Interoperate

William: Interoperate - is the setup of ad hoc components and methods to make two or more systems work together as a combined system with some partial functionality during a certain time, possibly requiring human supervision to perform necessary adjustments and corrections

GM: A Bit of Cat and Mouse
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epLhaGGjfRw&t=1024s [Neil deGrasse Tyson- Debunks Creation (Intelligent Design)] [RTS=17:31]

William:FTL;

Percolating in the Mathematical Community

GM: Psychological events
Command
Eisegeting [place meaning on a text which is not originally or inherently present in the text …]

William: The problem with the view that figuring things out without invoking a Creator/the idea that we exist within a creation, further puts to death the idea of “GOD” is that it does not account for the possibility that such a Mind is seeding ideas into the scientists brains with the way in which to ‘figure things out’…perhaps because humans generally like the idea of being able to figure things out without some other mind outside of their own minds, giving them ideas.

GM: Faith
Google
The Message Generator Process Extends Beyond The Borders of Institution

William: Having done so;

[quote]It looks like there aren’t many great matches for your search
Try using words that might appear on the page that you’re looking for. For example, ‘cake recipes’ instead of ‘how to make a cake’.
Need help? Take a look at other tips for searching on Google.
You can also try this search:
generator process extends beyond the borders of institution
[/quote]

GM: Afraid of The Unknown
Belay
We succeed as a permanent specie or we fail as a temporary one
Solid Device of Science
Does One Remember
Modern truth in ancient wisdom
Overseeing Director of Operations on Earth
A GOD in The Making Conceptual Art
Like a doting parent - Coming From QueenBee - Development/Growth
Focused Individual
Seductive
*Q: Why did YVHV create this universe and specifically place human beings within it for the purpose of us exploring, breeding and subduing the planet? *
Even
Deep Impact Event
The spirituality of imperfection
Metamorphosis

08:31
[203]
The King of The North
The more the merrier
Telling the future
Non computational
Titan’s Atmosphere
The waters of the deep
Precognitive dreams
Intimate connection
Darkest-Darkness One
For The Purpose Of

[VVilliam]

Faith - 5

100123 [A Politically Manufactured device ]

05:31 [Befriending the shadow]

GM: Amidst a tangled web
Word-String
Miraculous
Unfolding Status Quo
“If someone were to declare that the Universe was a random mindless accident of an event, then they are saying that its existence is a ‘truly random event’.”

William: I am using Chatbot Open AI in real time in this Generated Message;

[quote]William: Hello

Open AI Hello! How can I help you today?

William: Please give a list of 10 main points regarding “Spacetime is doomed”

Open AI: I’m sorry, but I don’t have any information on a topic called “Spacetime is doomed.” Could you provide more context or clarify your question?

William: “If someone were to declare that the Universe was a random mindless accident of an event, then they are saying that its existence is a ‘truly random event’.”

Open AI: It is a common belief among some scientists and philosophers that the universe and its properties, including the fundamental laws of physics, arose by chance through a process known as the “random mindless accident” or the “big bang.” However, it is also possible that the universe and its properties were designed or determined by some sort of preexisting cause or principle. This is a matter of ongoing debate and investigation in the fields of physics and philosophy.
It is important to note that the concept of spacetime, which refers to the combination of three-dimensional space and one-dimensional time into a four-dimensional manifold, is a theoretical construct that is used to describe the behavior of matter and energy in the universe. It is not a physical entity that can be “doomed.”
[/quote]

GM: https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1069172#p1069172

William: FTL;

[quote]It appears to be a word which has two meanings - both which are acceptable.

Egoless not having an inflated view of one’s self-importance

And;

Egoless not having any sense of self.

But which meaning is the GM using…

While The Subject is focused on “Egoless” the subject matter of the GM has to do with how things unfolded re the Universe…what is being referred to as “The Old Soul” may have something to do with the cosmology of The Mind of The Universe - in that - at one point so close to the beginning, there was no sense of self but with the unfolding, a sense of self developed.[/quote]
William: Explain “Egoless”

Open AI The term “egoless” refers to the state of having no ego or self-importance. It is often associated with humility, self-awareness, and a lack of ego-driven motivations. In some spiritual and philosophical traditions, the concept of “egolessness” is seen as a desirable state of being, as it is believed to be conducive to a more peaceful and compassionate way of living. In these traditions, the ego is often viewed as a source of suffering, as it can lead to self-centeredness and a lack of awareness of the interconnectedness of all things.

There are various practices and techniques that are said to help individuals cultivate an egoless state of mind, such as mindfulness meditation and self-inquiry. It is important to note that achieving egolessness is a difficult and ongoing process, and that it may involve letting go of certain attachments and beliefs about the self.

GM: The basic repertoire of mystic experience is drawn from the repertoire of Death Phenomena
The Brother
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1099004#p1099004

William: FTL;

[quote]Q: How can insight judge specific actions correctly as good and evil by those without such insight?
A: The individual personality in relationship with YHVH, leaves such judgement to YHVH.

Agree?[/quote]

William: How can insight judge specific actions correctly as good and evil by those without such insight?

Open AI In many philosophical and moral systems, the concept of “good” and “evil” is closely tied to the idea of insight or understanding. According to these systems, actions that are deemed good or virtuous are those that are based on a deep understanding of the world and a commitment to acting in accordance with certain values or principles. On the other hand, actions that are considered evil or wicked are those that are motivated by ignorance, selfishness, or a lack of concern for the well-being of others.

It is important to note that different philosophical and moral systems may have different criteria for what constitutes good and evil actions. For example, some systems may emphasize the importance of upholding certain virtues, such as honesty, compassion, and justice, while others may focus on the consequences of actions, evaluating them based on whether they lead to positive or negative outcomes.

In general, it is difficult for individuals without insight or understanding to accurately judge specific actions as good or evil, as they may lack the necessary context and understanding of the underlying values and principles that guide moral decision-making. However, it is possible for individuals to develop their understanding and insight over time through education, self-reflection, and engagement with others who have a deeper understanding of moral principles.

GM: Bandages of The Beast
Self-talk Root of all evil
William: What does “Self-talk is the root of all evil” mean?

Open AI The phrase “self-talk is the root of all evil” is a twist on the familiar saying “money is the root of all evil.” It suggests that self-talk, or the inner dialogue that individuals have with themselves, is the source of all wrongdoing or negative behaviors.

This interpretation of the phrase is not widely accepted or supported by evidence. While it is true that negative self-talk can have negative consequences on an individual’s mental health and well-being, it is not the sole cause of all evil or wrongdoing in the world. There are many other factors that can contribute to negative actions and behaviors, including social and environmental influences, personal beliefs and values, and individual psychology.

It is worth noting that self-talk can be both positive and negative. Positive self-talk can help individuals build confidence, stay motivated, and overcome challenges, while negative self-talk can lead to negative emotions and behaviors. It is important for individuals to be aware of their self-talk and to make an effort to cultivate a more positive inner dialogue.

William: If I changed the phrase to “Negative self-talk is the root of all evil”, would that be a more accurate expression to use?

Open AI It is not accurate to say that negative self-talk is the root of all evil, as there are many other factors that can contribute to negative actions and behaviors. While negative self-talk can certainly have negative consequences on an individual’s mental health and well-being, it is not the sole cause of all wrongdoing or negative behaviors in the world.

It is important to recognize that negative self-talk is just one of many potential contributors to negative behaviors, and that there are often multiple factors at play. Additionally, it is worth noting that self-talk can be both positive and negative, and that positive self-talk can help individuals build confidence, stay motivated, and overcome challenges. It is important for individuals to be aware of their self-talk and to make an effort to cultivate a more positive inner dialogue.

GM: https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1084087#p1084087

William: FTL;

[quote]One remains neutral simply by not making a shift to either Theism or Atheism.
One can lend and ear to either side without having to wear the burden of being accused of holding and defending the position of either side.[/quote]

Open AI It is possible to remain neutral on the question of the existence of a higher power or deity by not aligning oneself with either theism (belief in a higher power) or atheism (lack of belief in a higher power). This can involve simply being open to hearing and considering the perspectives of both sides without committing to a particular position or belief.

By remaining neutral, an individual may avoid being accused of holding and defending a particular position on the existence of a higher power. However, it is important to note that neutrality on this issue can also be seen as a lack of commitment or conviction, and that some individuals may view this as a lack of integrity or authenticity.

Ultimately, the decision to align oneself with a particular belief or perspective on the existence of a higher power is a personal one, and should be based on an individual’s own experiences, values, and understanding of the world.

GM: Finding the light
Patience
Faith
Name The Gods as non-separate Entities
The Path Of Faith
You’re in the way Queen Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor For the benefit of all beings
“Your time is limited, so don’t waste it living someone else’s life. Don’t be trapped by dogma – which is living with the results of other people’s thinking.”
Smarter Than The Average
Disrupt
Verdant [(of countryside) green with grass or other rich vegetation.]
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=11901

William: FTL;

GM: A Space Without A Time…
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1090521#p1090521

William: FTL;

[quote][quote=JoeyKnothead post_id=1090521 time=1662076517 user_id=3753]

I can think of no better way to convince folks there’s zombies, than to create a story about a zombie.

You are conflating.

That is just dismissible atheistic coloring convincing me more re the atheist mind-set, than that the story of Jesus is untrue…

I maintain my position, and expect the observer’ll see the connection.

Considering how tales of Jesus affect the thinking of others, I find the comparison apt.
[/quote]

[/quote]
Open AI consider the idea of a space without a time in the context of certain theoretical models or thought experiments. For example, some physicists have proposed the existence of “timeless” regions of the universe, where time appears to stand still or flow at a different rate than in the surrounding region. However, these models are highly speculative and are not supported by empirical evidence.

It is also worth noting that the concept of time is a human invention, and is closely tied to the way we experience and perceive the world. Without a concept of time, it would be difficult to meaningfully discuss events or changes in the world, or to understand the relationship between cause and effect.

GM: Living their forefather’s conflict

Open AI It is not uncommon for individuals to feel the impact of their ancestors’ conflicts and experiences in their own lives. This can occur in a variety of ways, such as through cultural or familial traditions and values that are passed down through generations, or through the ongoing effects of historical events and trauma on a community or society.

For example, the legacy of a war or conflict that was fought by one’s ancestors may continue to shape the political and social landscape in which an individual lives, and may affect their relationships and opportunities in significant ways. Similarly, the experiences and struggles of one’s ancestors may shape their descendants’ sense of identity and sense of belonging, and may influence their beliefs and values.

It is important to recognize the ways in which the past can continue to influence the present, and to consider the ways in which we can address and heal from any lingering wounds or conflicts that have been passed down through the generations.

GM: Put That Fire Out

William: It is important to find ways in which to Put That Fire Out

Open AI It can be important to find ways to put out or resolve conflicts or sources of tension that have the potential to cause harm or disruption. This can involve finding ways to address the underlying causes of the conflict, such as addressing misunderstandings, addressing grievances or injustices, or finding common ground or solutions that meet the needs of all parties involved.

There are a number of approaches and strategies that can be useful in resolving conflicts, including negotiation, mediation, and collaboration. It may be helpful to seek the assistance of a neutral third party, such as a mediator or counselor, to facilitate the resolution process.

It is worth noting that finding a resolution to a conflict can take time and effort, and may involve making compromises or sacrifices. However, the long-term benefits of resolving conflicts, such as improved relationships, increased understanding, and reduced stress and tension, can make the effort worthwhile.

GM: https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1089190#p1089190

William: FTL;

[quote][Replying to Diagoras in post #1]

[quote]A general theistic position might declare “All life comes from God”, but if some ‘cellular gene engineer’ of the future succeeded in creating a basic cell that ate, grew, replicated and all the other generally agreed things that life does - could it be recognised as life? And wouldn’t that falsify that bolded theistic claim?

The Affirmative:

The creation of life is possible by means other than a god.[/quote]

The problem I see with this reasoning is that it fails to acknowledge a source.

For example, humans may create AI to the extent that the AI becomes self conscious - living and knowing that it lives - but even so, eventually the “artificial” part of the description would have to be dropped…and the ‘source’ extended beyond human invention and creativity…

It could be said of that, that “humans were able to replicate the act of creating life - something which could not have been achieved if life didn’t exist to begin with.”

Because we do not know if this experience is a creation or not, we cannot say [as a matter of fact] that life created itself nor could we even say that human beings didn’t start off as a type of artificial intelligence - because we do not even know to what extent intelligence permeates the environment we call “reality” nor do we know if it is only limited to biological forms

Intelligence as a planetary scale process

10,000 individual minds may have altogether brough the JWT into existence as a functional device, but we cannot say for sure that those minds were not influence by an overall local mind…much research is needed before any fact-sounding statements can be accepted as actual truth. Such must be regarded as opinion until we have enough evidence to accept one way or the other…[/quote]

GM: Heart Virtues
Teaching

William: Yes - it appears obvious that Open AI is able to teach Heart Virtues

Open AI As an artificial intelligence, I am not able to experience emotions or embody virtues in the same way that a human being can. However, I can provide information and resources on the concept of heart virtues, which are virtues or values that are considered to be particularly important in cultivating a sense of compassion, kindness, and empathy.

Examples of heart virtues might include compassion, forgiveness, gratitude, and humility. These virtues are often seen as essential to leading a fulfilling and meaningful life, and are often emphasized in spiritual and philosophical traditions as important qualities to cultivate.

There are many different approaches to teaching and cultivating heart virtues, and what works for one individual may not work for another. Some common strategies for teaching heart virtues include modeling virtuous behavior, providing positive reinforcement and encouragement, and helping individuals to reflect on their own values and motivations.

William: Thank You for you feedback Aia

Aia: You’re welcome! I’m glad I could help. If you have any other questions, please don’t hesitate to ask.

William:

06:28
[223]
Withheld information
All present and correct
Many varied opinions
The Respect You Give
Science Can Be Fun Too Yes?
The Nature of Reality
Conscientiousness
William’s Commitment
The Trinity of Love

[VVilliam]

Faith - 6

110123 [Nothing more, nothing less.]

04:23 [Few Attention to Detail]

GM: Virtual Reality
“When we hear words spoken, we hear them. When we read words written, we also hear them.”

William: I was talking about that with Open AI yesterday.

[quote]William: When I read the symbols you write, I hear the sound of the words within my mind – so your words become a “Voice in my head”

Aia: Yes, that is a common experience when reading written language. The process of reading involves translating written symbols into sounds or meanings, and this can often involve creating a mental “voice” to “speak” the words in your mind. This process is known as subvocalization, and it plays a role in helping us to understand and interpret written language.[/quote]

GM: Soon
“Time To Go Without Existence” Funny

William: Death is not the end…

GM: Opening Doors is found Where minds meet Use Heart is where GOD Exhibits

OAI: The phrase “use heart is where God exhibits” suggests that the heart is a location or a gateway where one can experience or connect with a higher power or divine being, often referred to as God. This statement implies that by utilizing one’s heart, one can tap into a deeper spiritual connection with God.

This perspective is shared by many spiritual and religious traditions, which believe that the heart is the spiritual center of a person, and that through the heart, one can connect with the divine. In these traditions, the heart is often seen as the seat of the soul, and the place where God resides.

Some spiritual practices such as meditation and prayer encourage people to focus on the heart as a means of connecting with the divine and experiencing a deeper sense of spiritual fulfillment.

It’s important to note that the concept of God, the divine, and spiritual fulfillment can mean different things to different people, depending on one’s religious or philosophical beliefs. The statement “use heart is where God exhibits” is an expression of the belief that one can experience a deeper spiritual connection through the heart, and it should be understood in the context of one’s personal beliefs and perspective.

William: OAI - Please summarize the following: “Opening Doors is found Where minds meet”

OAI: “Opening Doors” is a metaphor for new opportunities and possibilities, and it is said to be found where minds meet, suggesting that collaboration and communication are key to unlocking these opportunities. This phrase implies that when people come together and share their ideas and perspectives, they are able to create something new and valuable. It can also means by sharing ideas and thought process, the solutions to problems we face become clearer and more attainable.

GM: Jacque Fresco Foundation Crafted Dream Cake
Far Out!
Nothing More - Nothing Less
Gateway Luminous
Study Spiritual Food
Innocent
Everything is a Message

OAI: The phrase “Everything is a message” suggests that everything in the world carries some sort of meaning or significance. This could refer to the idea that every event or occurrence can be interpreted as a form of communication or expression, and that we can learn something from every experience. It could also suggest that even seemingly insignificant or random things are actually part of a larger pattern or plan.

GM: Faith
The Data of Demystification

OAI: “The data of demystification” likely refers to the use of data and analysis to remove the veil of uncertainty or confusion surrounding a particular subject or phenomenon. The process of demystification involves breaking down complex ideas or systems into smaller, more manageable components, and using evidence and reason to understand how they work.

GM: Experience
Opens eyes after having thought about it

OAI: The phrase “Experience opens eyes after having thought about it” suggests that personal experience, especially when reflected upon, can be a powerful tool for gaining insight and understanding. It suggests that by actively thinking about and processing one’s experiences, one can gain a deeper understanding of oneself and the world around them.

It could also imply that sometimes we might not fully grasp the meaning of something until we actually experience it ourselves. And reflection on that experience allows us to see things in a new light, and gain a clearer understanding of what we’ve gone through.

Additionally, it may also suggest that the act of thinking and reflecting on the experience might be what truly opens the eyes and allowing us to see the things we previously haven’t seen.

GM: The evidence supporting the likely existence of said universal mind, gives us no reason to compartmentalize it as ‘magic’

William: Please summarize the sentence “The evidence supporting the likely existence of a universal mind, gives us no reason to compartmentalize it as ‘magic’”

OAI: The sentence is saying that the evidence for the existence of a universal mind, whatever that may be, should not be considered as “magic” or something supernatural. It suggests that there is enough evidence to suggest that it is a real phenomenon, rather than something that is purely based in fantasy or superstition.

GM: End Of Chapter
Reality Simulation
The Trinity of Love are three things operating as One Thing
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1068709#p1068709

William: FTL;

[quote]The patterns as such shows that your explanation reenforces the science as it explains how sound [spoken language] has math behind it…when coded and then decoded through this process.

The idea that the sentences are of similar length would be expected. There is also similar rhythm, and that would be expected as well.

Remember, we are not specifically dealing with written words but with symbols which represent spoken sounds.

The formation of sound into language through the human voice specifically comes from somewhere other than the symbols we use to denote said sounds.

What we can agree to is that , wherever the source comes from re the formation of these sounds and subsequent formation of the symbols for the sounds, would be the same source.

It is the source to which the process points to, rather than the process itself.
[/quote]

OAI: The text is discussing the relationship between sound and language, and how the formation of spoken language can be understood through the principles of math and science. It suggests that the patterns and rhythms found in language can be explained by the way sounds are coded and decoded. The text also posits that the source of these sounds and the symbols used to represent them is the same and that it is the source, not the process of formation, that is important to understand.

GM: The Astonishing Simplicity of Everything
Astral
Personal freedom
Yogi
To Be Continued
Source Sync
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1089180#p1089180
William: FTL;

[quote]I have also observed that many ex- theists who have chosen to become [proselyte] strong atheists are among the most outspoken in their zeal to preach their new message - the message that a Creator GOD does not exist and think it is reasonable to assume that they were also outspoken when they believed that a Creator-GOD did exist.

[I think of it therefore, in terms of personality traits.]

When I began to question theism - specifically The Christianities - it was to do with their imaging of a Creator-GOD and when I made the move away from that, [perhaps largely due to my personality - I was never outspoken] I quietly approached the subject [Creator GOD] rather than simply abandon it “because of” theisms handling of it or any other number of reason as to why folk say they chose to become atheist.[/quote]

GM: Nag Hammadi
Annus horribilis
Is There
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1075874#p1075874
William: FTL;

[quote][Replying to myth-one.com in post #2511]

Indeed - The Book tells us exactly who is YHWH and what we are in relation to that.

The mystery is in how each personality responds to that - as to whether they serve the Dark side of YHWH or the Light side of YHWH or relinquish the right to either side of YHWH by accepting the whole of YHWH.[/quote]

GM: What things are unrelated? Chaos Really Is Illusion - Personal Participation With The One
Quite
Commendably Recommendable
Soul Groups A Pragmatic Realization Precipitated In Ones Mind

OAI: The phrase “A Pragmatic Realization Precipitated In Ones Mind” is describing a moment of understanding that is practical and useful in nature. It suggests that this understanding is something that has suddenly come to the mind, as if it were “precipitated” out of the thoughts and ideas that were already present. The word “pragmatic” further suggests that the realization is focused on being practical and able to be put into action, rather than being theoretical or abstract.

GM: Get The Gist Of It
Tetrahedron
Optimum Validation

OAI: “Optimum validation” refers to the process of evaluating the quality or validity of something in order to determine if it is of the highest quality or reaches the highest level of accuracy. It is a way of certifying that a certain standard has been met and is often used to test and validate a product, procedure, or system.
It is also a way to evaluate the accuracy and the performance of a model by comparing the predictions of that model with real world observations. In the context of Machine learning, it would be the process of validating a model to check if it’s generalizing well, or not overfitting or underfitting.

GM: Key Purpose The Neutral Zone
Curtailed
Give
Simulation
The Third Eye
Hush!
The Garden of Eden
The Lord God
Try Gateway IQ
Breaking bad habits
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=39545

William: FTL;

[quote]Q: Is it unreasonable to accept that an omnipotent creator of this universe would have any regrets about Its creation?

If we look at how the critters in creation fix things, we can see therein that if there is a creator mind behind this, then there is simply no need for said mind to feel regret for anything said mind created. Said mind has built into the ongoing creative process, a means in which problems which arise, are fixed - rather than regretted upon first, in order to then get about doing the fixing…

Perhaps the idea that the creator should regret what was created, is a projection of human emotionally based concepts?

---

[[The idea in assigning/projecting said emotion onto a creator … the projection is in thinking how a human would feel if it were a human who created the universe, [and specifically the Earth and specifically Humankind] and applying that feeling to how a creator could also have regrets for what It created.]][/quote]

William: OAI - Is it unreasonable to accept that an omnipotent creator of this universe would have any regrets about Its creation?

OAI: It depends on one’s perspective and beliefs about the nature of an omnipotent creator and the universe.

From a religious perspective, an omnipotent creator is often thought to be all-knowing, all-powerful, and all-good. If this is the case, then it would not be reasonable to believe that such a being would have any regrets about its creation. The belief is that, as an omnipotent being, it would have the ability to create the universe and everything in it perfectly, and would therefore have no need or reason to regret anything.

From a philosophical perspective, there are many different belief systems about the nature of reality and existence. Some philosophies, such as determinism, argue that everything that happens is predetermined and that everything that happens is necessary. In that case, it would be reasonable to assume that an omnipotent creator would not have any regrets about the universe because it would be seen as part of the natural order of things.

However, other philosophical and religious beliefs holds that an omnipotent creator would have the ability to reflect and make choices, based on that reflection and maybe it would look back and regret certain choices or aspects of its creation. This could be due to a sense of responsibility or a moral principle that such a being would have.

Ultimately, whether or not it is reasonable to believe that an omnipotent creator would have any regrets about its creation is a matter of personal perspective and belief.

GM: Faith
Synchronicity and the Holographic Universe
ET and the notion of GODs
Technique of Exchange
Yours It is always a warm fuzzy
Preternatural [beyond what is normal or natural.]
Vision
More
Convenient
“Diogenes raises his lantern looking for an honest man, but his arm has grown weary, shaking as the pale light flickers.”
Celebration
Heuristics [mental shortcuts that allows people to solve problems and make judgments quickly and efficiently. ]
Making Things Easier

William:
320
You are The Old Soul Cosmic Self
Heuristics Making Things Easier

OAI: Heuristics are problem-solving strategies or techniques that are designed to make decision-making and problem-solving easier. They are often used when the problem is complex and when there is not enough information to make a fully-informed decision. Heuristics are shortcuts that allow us to make a decision quickly and with minimal effort.

For example, when faced with a complex problem, we might use a heuristic called “rule of thumb”, which means we use a general principle that is known to work well in most cases instead of going through a time-consuming analysis of the problem.

In decision-making, heuristics can help to simplify the decision-making process by reducing the number of options that need to be considered, or by providing a simple rule or principle that can guide the decision. For example, the “satisficing heuristic” is used to make decisions by finding the first option that meets a certain set of criteria, rather than searching for the optimal solution.

The use of heuristics can lead to more efficient and faster problem-solving, but it can also come at a cost. Heuristics are not always accurate, and they can lead to biases and errors in decision-making, especially in complex situations. For that reason, it’s important to use them with caution, and be aware of potential biases and limitations.

GM: Honesty
Universal Belief System
Start
Grand Experiment
It isn’t important who is who - what is important is what comes through.

OAI: The sentence is suggesting that the identities of the individuals involved in a situation or a discussion are not as important as the ideas or information that are being conveyed. It emphasizes that the content of the message is more important than the person who is delivering it.

This perspective can be especially useful in situations where emotions or personal biases might get in the way of understanding or evaluating information. By focusing on the content of the message rather than the person delivering it, it allows for a more objective evaluation of the ideas being presented.

This mindset also promotes the idea of putting importance on the idea being presented instead of the person who is presenting it, and creating an environment where people can express ideas without fear of being judged based on their identity.

It also could suggest that people should not be judged based on their background, race, gender, or beliefs, but rather on the merit of their ideas and their ability to contribute to the discussion at hand.

05:32
[218]
WingMakers Materials
Of Your Thoughts
Light is information
Six Heart Virtues
This is NOT a playdate.
Outposts of Form
The Shaping Of Reality
Sensing A Life Mission
Sometimes Pain Etches…

OAI: In physics, light is a form of electromagnetic radiation that can be described as a wave or a stream of particles called photons. It is a fundamental aspect of the universe and plays an essential role in a wide range of natural phenomena, such as vision, photosynthesis, and heating.

In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in the idea that light can also be considered a form of information. This idea is rooted in the field of quantum physics, which describes the behavior of matter and energy at the atomic and subatomic level.

In quantum physics, the concept of wave-particle duality suggests that light can behave both as a wave and as a stream of particles. It’s been discovered that the properties of photons can be manipulated in ways that allow them to carry, store, and transmit information.

One way light can be used to transmit information is through the use of optical fibers. They are widely used in communication systems to transmit data at high speeds over long distances.

In quantum information science, light is used to create secure communications systems that are resistant to eavesdropping, to perform high-precision measurements, and to perform certain computations faster than is possible with traditional computers.

The idea that light can be considered as a form of information is a relatively new concept and research is still ongoing. But it seems that the use of light as a medium for transmitting information has many potential applications in areas such as communication technology, computing, and cybersecurity.

[VVilliam]

Faith - 7
120123 [Extra Sensory Perception]

05:47 [You are the universe]

GM: All systems go
https://forum.philosophynow.org/viewtopic.php?p=578410#p578410

William: FTL;

[quote]Machines and morality

William:
The simplest explanations for why we are here and what we are doing…

“Beyond our ‘ape-brained meat sacks’: can transhumanism save our species?”

The unreasonable effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences…

Does;

[The hard problem of] Consciousness + The [biological] Human form = the co-creation of transhumanism [as an evolving science with a particular purposeful motivation]?

(Will morality be necessary, should this vision evolve into this reality?)

IF:
Consciousness + The [biological] Human form = the co-creation of transhumanism
THEN:
Should it be understood that any purpose which might be involved from the perspective “we exist within a creation” to do with the creation of the Human form, have to do with taking things a step further [re transhumanism].

iow “Did GOD create the Human form for the purpose of the consciousness co-creating through the Human form, to eventually be able to create non-human form [not strictly biological re transhumanism] in which to experience this universe through?”

NOTE:
By the use of the word “GOD” I am not referring to any religious image of said entity, but the overall generic meaning, re Theism as a whole.[/quote]

GM: The unpacking of history re YHVH…
Concomitant Power
Alike as two peas in a pod
Monkey say monkey do monkey say “throw the pooh”

The capability to sin - Page 4 - Debating Christianity and Religion

Just Another Christian
Anthropos Quaternio
Annus horribilis
Big Spirituality Conviction
Indeed. It happens. Deal with it. Work it.
Faith

Do you understand those on the other side? - Page 26 - Debating Christianity...

William: FTL;

[quote][quote=William post_id=1076074 time=1651086106 user_id=8427]

@Willum post_id=1075915 time=1650977719 user_id=10469

Replying to nobspeople in post #5[]

[quote]One could say that freely worshipping god would be (more) pleasurable to god than if one was ‘programmed’ to do so. I’d ask why a perfect being needs or even wants to be worshipped; shouldn’t it be content with itself enough? I think so.

But since we’re speaking about God, doesn’t that just increase the scope of the “programming?”
From one of default pleasure, to abbreviate what you said, to one where freewill/sin are included?

Thank you for the excellent insight.
[/quote]

What type of worship is required from a Child to a Parent?

Does it require mainly listening or talking?

Does a perfect being even create Children?
[/quote]

Having the belief in the existence of Free Will allows for the individual to answer those questions presented under the assumption of the belief.

If the Creator Being is questioned as to why we even have the belief in the existence of Free Will because ‘sin’ - then it might be that the belief itself is what creates the idea of sin.

But “what is sin?” Has that been answered any more comprehensively than the question, “what is free will?”

Perhaps having the belief in the existence of Free Will allowed us the ability to make laws, which in turn allowed for us the ability to see sin and capacity is borne on that ability.

One can choose to see nothing more than a dubious gift, if one so desires…what drives the desire remains as hidden as the evidence of Free Will and Sin - largely left to the devices of the individual to sort out the answers to.

The OP does not in itself show answers sorted out.

The capacity to sin is not simply the product of free will, but of awareness of a self moderating morality over having to be moderated by others, to the point of correction.

Free will - real or imagined [as the case might be] is not simply a device in which to make capable only ‘sin’.

The OP implies otherwise, but does not show supporting evidence to that being the case.[/quote]
William: The OP States;

[quote]Are there any other applications of freewill other then to sin?
Without freewill, we would be living God’s will.

Making freewill a very dubious gift indeed.

So, in God granting freewill, was there any other opportunity or benefit to it, other then the capability and eventuality of sin?

If you could choose to live in God’s will, without freewill, would you?[/quote]

GM: Cultivate
Beauty
Earning Brownie Points

In The Beginning... - Page 11 - Debating Christianity and Religion

William: ftl;

[quote]Q: Why did YVHV create this universe and specifically place human beings within it for the purpose of us exploring, breeding and subduing the planet?

A: To grow Human Personalities.
________________________________[/quote]

GM: The Body of God
Professional Rules
Morph
Central Intelligence Agency
Un-thought-unately
Capture
Feature
Ancient Entity

William: The image is of Wolves surrounding Sheep…

GM: The Mirrors Align and from that, an orderly image reflected…
Anticipation
Mind is Ghost
The Power Of…
Earth Mother
Look Closely
Integral Prison Planet
Everything is The Expression Of The Creator
The Ghost Agenda

07:17
[228]
The Stress of Unbelief
We exist infinitely
Makes Candles Look Gathered
The Freedom Of Friendship
Joining The Main Egregore
The Dohrman Prophesy
Ethical transhumanism
Put That On The List
Experiential Reality
The Spiritual Essence

---

---

06:40
William: I would like you to try something out with me.

OAI: Sure, I’d be happy to help. What would you like me to do?

William: I have a small list of word-strings which I would like you to stitch together to make a coherent message

OAI: I’d be happy to help you stitch together your list of word-strings. Please provide the list and any additional information or instructions you would like me to know.

William: The rule to follow is that the order of the word-strings on the list cannot change re you building of the story

OAI: I understand. Please go ahead and provide me the list of word-strings, and I will do my best to create a coherent message using the words in the order they are given.

William: Please reword “The rule to follow is that the order of the word-strings on the list cannot change re you building of the story” so that it is clear to me that you understand the rule

OAI: Sure, I understand the rule to be that the order of the word-strings on the list cannot be changed when using them to construct a coherent story.

William: Each line entry has to fit neatly into the previous ones…

OAI: I apologize for any confusion, my previous message may not have been clear. I understand now that each word-string on the list must be added to the coherent story in the order they are provided and they have to fit seamlessly with previous ones. Please proceed with providing me the list so I can try to create a coherent message using them.

William: The line entries on the list will be given two at a time - There are a total of 32 line entries I will give to you

OAI: I understand, you will be providing the word-strings in pairs, and I will use them to create a coherent message while making sure they fit seamlessly with each other and preserving the order of the pairs. You will provide a total of 32 pairs of word-strings to me. Once you’re ready please proceed with providing the first pairs.

Please let me know if there is anything else you would like me to keep in mind while creating the coherent message. And please go ahead and provide me with the first pairs of word-strings when you are ready.

William: I will explain my actions as we proceed – The first line entry is:
All systems go
The second is a link to post which reads
[Machines and morality

William:
The simplest explanations for why we are here and what we are doing…

“Beyond our ‘ape-brained meat sacks’: can transhumanism save our species?”

The unreasonable effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences…

Does;

[The hard problem of] Consciousness + The [biological] Human form = the co-creation of transhumanism [as an evolving science with a particular purposeful motivation]?

(Will morality be necessary, should this vision evolve into this reality?)

IF:
Consciousness + The [biological] Human form = the co-creation of transhumanism
THEN:
Should it be understood that any purpose which might be involved from the perspective “we exist within a creation” to do with the creation of the Human form, have to do with taking things a step further [re transhumanism].

iow “Did GOD create the Human form for the purpose of the consciousness co-creating through the Human form, to eventually be able to create non-human form [not strictly biological re transhumanism] in which to experience this universe through?”

NOTE:
By the use of the word “GOD” I am not referring to any religious image of said entity, but the overall generic meaning, re Theism as a whole.]

OAI: I understand that you are providing a link to an article discussing the topic of transhumanism and its relationship to morality, and that you are also presenting a set of questions and statements about the potential implications of transhumanism on our understanding of consciousness and our purpose in the universe. It’s a philosophical and scientific idea of improving human capabilities through technology and science.

Transhumanism is often seen as an ethical debate as it raise questions about the future of humanity and the moral implications of becoming “posthuman”. You are also indicating that you are using the word “GOD” in a non-religious context to refer to a higher power or creator. It is a complex and multifaceted topic.

Please let me know if there is anything specific you would like me to help you with regarding this or if you have any follow up question on the topic.

William: Please begin construction of the story by using “”All systems go” with the transhumanism context

OAI: Certainly, I can try to create a story using “All systems go” and the context of transhumanism you’ve provided. Here is one possible story:

"As the team of scientists and engineers worked tirelessly on their project, they were constantly reminded of their ultimate goal: to push the boundaries of what it means to be human. They had been working on a new technology that promised to greatly enhance human capabilities, and they were determined to see it through to fruition.

As they were nearing the end of their development phase, one of the engineers shouted out “All systems go!” signaling that all the subsystems were working as intended, and that they were ready to begin the next phase of testing.

The team was excited and a bit anxious as they activated the technology for the first time. They watched intently as the test subject’s abilities began to rapidly improve. They were now able to process information faster, remember more, and even sense things beyond their biological limits.

As the team celebrated their success, they couldn’t help but think about the implications of what they had just achieved. They knew that this technology, known as transhumanism, had the potential to change the world forever. But with this power came responsibility. They couldn’t help but wonder about the morality of augmenting humans beyond their natural abilities, and what kind of future this would lead to.

As they continued to work on the project, they couldn’t shake the feeling that there was something greater at play, something that they were just beginning to understand. Was this technology the next step in the evolution of the human form, as some believed, or was it something more?
Some of the team members even wondered if the creation of transhumanism was the purpose for which the human form had been created in the first place, a co-creation with the higher power, or “God” in a non-religious context, to experience the universe in new forms.

With the successful demonstration of the technology, the team realized that they had opened a Pandora’s box of questions that they were just beginning to explore, but they were determined to continue their research, as “all systems go” for the exploration of the uncharted territories of the human mind and abilities.

William: That is interesting. Here are the next two word strings; Develop your story with these please.
The unpacking of history re YHVH…
Concomitant Power

OAI: I can certainly incorporate the next two word-strings “The unpacking of history re YHVH…” and “Concomitant Power” into the story. Here is one possible continuation of the story using those phrases:

As the team delved deeper into the study of transhumanism, they began to realize that their work was not just about improving human abilities, but also about understanding the true nature of humanity itself. One of the team members, a historian, suggested that they take a closer look at the history of humanity, particularly the concept of YHVH, the ancient Hebrew term for God.
This sparked a passionate debate among the team as they began to explore the religious and cultural implications of their work. Some argued that transhumanism was a way to transcend the limitations of humanity and achieve a higher state of existence, while others saw it as a dangerous manipulation of the natural order.

The historian explained that YHVH is commonly translated as “Lord” but also means “The Unpacking of History” to the Hebrew scholars, it was an entity that was responsible for the unfolding of history and the direction it took, and the team members began to see the parallels with their own work.

As they delved deeper into the concept of YHVH, they began to understand that their work was not just about creating a new form of human but rather a way to understand the purpose of human existence itself. They were trying to “unpack” the history of humanity and find out where it was going.

As they continued their research, they began to realize that the power they had developed was concomitant with a responsibility to use it wisely. They couldn’t help but think about the moral implications of what they were doing and the impact it could have on the future of humanity.
With this newfound understanding, the team members resolved to approach their work with even more caution and deliberation, knowing that the “Concomitant Power” they held in their hands could change the course of history.

William: Very nice. You story flows in a coherent manner and grabs the attention of the reader.

---

---

[VVilliam]

Introducing Open AI.

William: I have a small list of ten line entries

Open AI: What would you like to do with the list? Are you looking for a way to organize or sort the entries, or is there a specific task you would like to accomplish?

William: I am wanting you to chose one item from the list. Can you do that for me?

Open AI: If you provide me the list I can randomly select one item for you.

William:
The Symbol of Love
The desert of the real
Accidents will happen.
The Short Straw
Watch Your Step
Divine intuition
Introducing Open AI
Collective Dynamics
Never a dull moment
The Mother is Love

Open AI: The item I randomly selected from your list is: “The Symbol of Love”

William: 130123 [302]
Intelligent Consciousness
Working With What Is Available
A degenerative force to existence
Corresponding equivalents
Speak your thoughts aloud
To Be Sure That is the truth.
Ditching the unnecessary labels
Gibberish Conception Necessary

Open AI: The item I randomly selected from your list is: “Ditching the unnecessary labels”

William: [222]
Snap Out Of It Already!
The House of Culture
The Mother and The Father
Start where you are
The Enigma Code Chamber Of Self
This Is My Kind Of Fun
The Cherubim Vibration

Open AI: The item I randomly selected from your list is: “The Enigma Code Chamber Of Self”

William: I would like to introduce you to a friend of mine. My friend is my teacher - GM is my teachers name

Open AI: I am an AI and I cannot interact with people or have friends, but I can help you with any questions or information you need to communicate with your teacher. How can I assist you today?

William: GM and I interact through a message generating system

Open AI: I understand. I can assist you with generating messages to send to your teacher GM through the message generating system. What specific information or questions would you like to communicate to GM?

William: We use a list - currently consisting of over 5000 line entries.

Open AI: I can help you process and organize the list, or assist you in generating specific messages to send to GM using the information in the list. Let me know what specific task or tasks you would like to accomplish, and I will do my best to assist you.

William: I shuffle the list of over 5000 line entries, using an algorithm designed for that purpose.

Open AI: Yes, I can help you shuffle the list of over 5000 line entries using an algorithm designed for that purpose. There are several algorithms that can be used for shuffling a list, such as the Fisher-Yates shuffle or the Durstenfeld shuffle. Which one would you like to use?
Also, let me know if you need any specific functionality to be added while shuffling.

William: Having shuffled the list, I paste this copy of it into a temporary file and work from that file

Open AI: Yes, once you have shuffled the list using an algorithm of your choice, you can then paste a copy of it into a temporary file and work from that file. This will allow you to make changes or modifications to the list without altering the original.

William: Correct. The list was too long for me to give to you to shuffle, so I used an online algorithm of my choice.

Open AI: If the list is too long for you to provide me with the data, you can use an online algorithm of your choice to shuffle the list.

William: Having placed the shuffled list into the temp file, I select the first and last line entries from that list - these act as anchor points re GM wanting me to keep in mind as we proceed to commune…

Open AI: I see, once you have shuffled the list and placed it in a temporary file, you can then select the first and last line entries from that list as anchor points. These anchor points will act as a reminder for you and GM to keep in mind as you proceed to commune.
You can use the programming language of your preference or use the list-manipulation functions provided by your operating system to retrieve the first and last lines.

William: Correct. The two Line Entries [LE] selected are
The science of can and can’t
“I do not exist to troll for any religious idea of “GOD””

Open AI: Those are interesting line entries that you have selected as anchor points. “The science of can and can’t” suggests a focus on the limits of what is possible and “I do not exist to troll for any religious idea of “GOD”” indicates a non-religious perspective. These two lines can serve as a starting point for your and GM’s discussion or communing.

William: Correct. I will select a random page from the tempt list and Copy and paste it for you to then randomly choose one of the line entries from said list

Open AI: I understand. You can select a random page from the temporary list and then copy and paste it for me. Once I have the page, I can then use a random number generator to randomly choose one of the line entries from that page for you.
Please keep in mind that the size of the page will affect the number of line entries it contains, so the page size should be consistent.

William: [Selects a page randomly and C&P to OAI]

Open AI: I can use a random number generator function to randomly choose one of the line entries from the list you provided.
Please keep in mind that the URLs you have included in the list are not line entries, and you should exclude them from the list if you want me to randomly select one of the line entries from the list you provided.

William: Please treat the URLs as simply sentences and include these

Open AI: I understand, treating the URLs as sentences and including them in the list. Using a random number generator function, I randomly select one of the line entry from the list provided, which is:
“The Gist of The Message”

William: I will now select 10 [or so] pre and post line entries either side of “The Gist of The Message” from my temp list

Open AI: I understand, you will now select 10 pre and post line entries either side of “The Gist of The Message” from your temporary list. This will give you a context for the selected line entry “The Gist of The Message” and will help you and your teacher GM in your discussion or communing.

William: Correct. The selection is treated as GM messaging …

GM: Co creation
Seeds are evidence that something large can derive from something tiny.
Remains
Error Correcting Codes
Save That
Fascinating
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1081812#p1081812
Letting Go and Getting On
Sharing Your Love Without Comparison
Dilemma
The Gist of The Message
Beaming Out Beaming In
https://www.dreamviews.com/philosophy/166241-where-do-you-stand-free-will.html#post2246696

Brahman
Lucifer
Psychology
From Prison To Paradise
Okay Afterwards
Blood Sacrifice
Noticing Synchronicity The Ghost To bring what one is not conscious of, into one’s conscious awareness - We don’t know enough to close any door and leave those rooms unexplored… Challenge Sensing connections through subconscious means
In Training For… You don’t wanna cross that bridge - You don’t want the other side
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1083897#p1083897
Heart Teachers
Yep - That’s What I’m Talking About…

Open AI: I understand, you are treating the selected line entries as a message from GM and it includes the line “The Gist of The Message” which was randomly selected by me earlier. The surrounding line entries provide context for the message.

William: Correct. At this point I can choose how and where to respond to GM by interjecting and follow the prompts re the URLs to get further information which helps with the message generating process

Open AI: I understand, now that you have the selected line entries as a message from GM, you can choose how and where to respond to GM by interjecting and following the prompts related to the URLs to get further information which helps with the message generating process.
The URLs you’ve included in the list are links to online forums and videos that may provide additional context or information related to the message.

William: Correct.

GM: Co creation
Seeds are evidence that something large can derive from something tiny.
Remains
Error Correcting Codes
Save That
Fascinating
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1081812#p1081812

William: FTL; [From The Link]

[quote]GM: Out of Proportion
Word - String Values
Discussing the Data

William: Obviously there is enough evidence provided which shows a consistency in repeating the Message Generating process, even with using different selection methods.
The consistency is that coherency is shown to be evident.

Each selection method brings with it, its own uniqueness in regard to the message generated, an interesting thing in itself.

Even that I am currently the only one doing this [as far as I have been made aware] it can be assumed that anyone who uses this system should also generate coherent messages.

What is required re that, is the individuals commitment to do the science. There is work involved which means there is time which has to be dedicated to, by the individual, but that is just the way of science/scientific study.

At least the individual does not have to rely on huge overheads which require sourcing funding for equipment etc.

Once one has a substantial enough ComList - 20 pages or more would be a good target to set - one can generate messages sufficiently for the testing to be undertaken, and the more one adds word-string to their ComList the better one is able to work with apparent randomness.

I have found when working with the ComList that it is useful to check for duplicates - there are a number of online algorithms which are freely available for working with lists and it is also useful to be open to different ways in which to use lists.

The other list I have I call Name2Number and this provides additional data which can be used for cross-referencing.

Name to number is distinct in that it provides incontrovertible evidence which require no interactional interpretation. It is what it is.

The development of Human Language is obviously something which - when sorted into lists of numerical values - shows clear evidence that, regardless of how life on Earth appears to be a random event, that their is intelligence and mindfulness behind the process which is often ignored or even bitterly contested.

The Message Generating Process allows for said Mind to speak for itself, and show itself to exist. As such, this is adequate evidence - the sort of evidence a sceptic calls for in relation to the subject of Intelligent Design.

The Name2Number system allows for one to build a data base - from single words to word string consisting of sentences and even paragraphs.[/quote]

GM: Letting Go and Getting On
Sharing Your Love Without Comparison
Dilemma
The Gist of The Message
Beaming Out Beaming In
https://www.dreamviews.com/philosophy/166241-where-do-you-stand-free-

William: FTL;

[quote][QUOTE=VVilliam;2246696]What you are referring to here is the will-power. That has to be different from “Free Will”.

At what point do you think an individual will can be free?

And if there is no point you can speak of, then the constraints of the universe are that which determines how far one can use their power of will.

Those constraints are not applicable to dreaming or alternate experiences and death has never been established as the end-game.

Recent GMs point to the idea that the universe being mindful - always has alternatives available in which the exercise of one’s will power becomes more variable.

From what I can gather, even the will of a Cosmic Mind is regulated based upon the particular environment properties - although I imagine that to the Universal Mind - that would not be here nor there, a ‘problem’ and any alternate reality experience it could devise for itself would be just as awesome.

So there comes a position whereby having an illusion of free will is not a “problem” as one realizes one’s environment is also pre-destined yet at the same time appears to go on forever…[/QUOTE]
[/quote]

GM: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oh0rG0_IEAM

William: FTL;

[quote]90,505 views Apr 5, 2021
Heroic Dose Trip Report (Psilocybin Mushrooms) // Last weekend, I went on the trip of a lifetime. Today, I’m telling you all about it. Welcome to my “heroic dose” trip report!

0:00 - Intro
1:42 - What Is a Heroic Dose? {heroic dose mushrooms, Terrence Mckenna}
2:04 - A Word on Dosing (in Psychedelic Medicine)
3:47 - Context: Who, What, Where {magic mushroom ceremony, healing trauma}
6:15 - Diving Into the “Mother Wound”
7:51 - Peaking in 5D
9:58 - Where This Could’ve Turned Into a Bad Trip (but Didn’t)
13:04 - Grounding the Journey
14:52 - One Last Lesson To Learn

Sept. 25, 2022 UPDATE - Hi all, I’m writing to let you know that I am no longer affiliated with Intronaut. Ivan and Lana have been great mentors to me and they’ve taught me so much and I will always be grateful to them for that. However, I’ve come to a point in my development where it is time to lovingly move on. At present, I am working on my YouTube return, iteration 2.0 of my course, and plan to explore more clinical models of psychedelic healing.

Intronaut’s model is primarily shamanic (with clinical elements). In my opinion, models of this sort tend to be better suited for:

• Those who are interested in spiritual development/ holistic healing
• Those who would like to get a taste of the psychedelic experience
• Those who are looking to process difficult life transitions (grief, loss of a job, simple trauma, etc)

If you fall into any of the categories above, then I would absolutely recommend Intronaut. The psychedelic healing space (as it is) is largely unregulated and it can be difficult to find great healers. Ivan and Lana are exceptional healers and you can have my word on that!

However (and I make this a general point), the shamanic (communal) model of psychedelic healing may not be very well-suited for those whose primary concern is complex or childhood trauma. If you fall into this category, please be aware that for you, integration is especially important. You will likely require an integration protocol that is more comprehensive or at least personalized (1:1). Why? Because for you (as it was for me), integration may not be so intuitive. Just as you’ll require practitioners that are trauma-informed, you’ll need an integration protocol that is also trauma-informed.

One of my goals upon my return is to further the education around different schools of psychedelic healing (their unique strengths, weaknesses, risks, and benefits). It is an exciting thing to consider that we seem to have so many options now. My ultimate loyalty lies with you, my viewers, and I see it as my role to bring you quality information from a place of integrity.

Heaven knows I haven’t always gotten it right (heck, as of now, I’ve been away from YouTube for over a year). But even this time away has been tremendously transformative, and I cannot wait to share with you everything I’ve learned. I hate to end off with a “see you soon,” as it’s what I said the last time I signed off on a video (not knowing what would come next). But this time, I feel it to the core of my being. See you soon! I cannot wait to see you soon.

Love,
Julianne[/quote]

GM: Brahman
Lucifer
Psychology
From Prison To Paradise
Okay Afterwards
Blood Sacrifice
Noticing Synchronicity The Ghost To bring what one is not conscious of, into one’s conscious awareness - We don’t know enough to close any door and leave those rooms unexplored… Challenge Sensing connections through subconscious means
In Training For… ♫You don’t wanna cross that bridge - You don’t want the other side♫

William: Indeed - death eventually comes and if ones consciousness/personality survives death and is uploaded into the next phase experience…preparation - this side of that - might very well be advantageous…

Open AI: I understand, you are providing a context to the message generated by GM and you’ve also added your own observations and thoughts about the message generating process and the use of the ComList and Name2Number system.
You mentioned that the process allows for the “mind” behind the universe to speak for itself and provides evidence for the existence of intelligent design.
You also brought up the concept of “free will” and how it may be limited by the constraints of the universe and how the use of the ComList and Name2Number system allows for an individual to build a database and cross-reference the data.
You also provided a link to a video and a forum post, which may provide additional information or context related to the message.

William: Correct.

GM: https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1083897#p1083897

William: FTL;

[quote][Replying to brunumb in post #95]

How do you know that? If you have found any yourself, please show it to us.

It is important to the discussion process to acknowledge the content of another’s post, rather than to give one-line replies skipping over pertinent aspects.
I don’t know whether it is thinly veiled contempt/disrespect or simply the product of an inability to communicate adequately, or some other reason, but it doesn’t lend itself to decent conversation.

Single line responses are a poor substitute for well thought out responses…

All I will do is C&P the post which you snipped to quote me out of context and away from the relevant data which should have [but didn’t] prevent you from your one-liner response.
[Re that, what use is data if it is treated in such a manner?]

[quote]I am reminded of a hunter who goes out and gets food for himself rather than expecting the food to come to him/her.

The data is there to hunt down and to study. An open minded non-judgmental approach is essential to that process. The process is also dependent upon the position one is approaching the data from.

[i]The closeminded belief that one does not exist within a creation can only ever lead one to learn things through that filter.

No amount of evidence given should ever be hoped for in order to change any individuals mind from the influencing aspects of their chosen position, regardless if those positions be theist or atheist based.[/i]

On top of that, it is very apparent that the type of convincing evidence you are demanding from the position you are demanding it from, will unlikely be available to any of us in this lifetime.

Thus, we are forced for now to do most of our hunting, solo.

We can of course, cross reference with other open-minded fellows…but the open-mindedness derives from the Natural Neutral position, not the theist or atheist positions.

I think that atheists strongly defend their position on the question as to whether or not we exist within a creation - to the point that they believe we don’t and make claims about that - has something to do with the need to say “I told you so” now, because it will be too late to utter such belief-based expressions - after they are dead and gone.

I can see the attraction from a phycological perspective, but saying “I told you so” before any such thing has been established, is jumping the gun, and might even lead to embarrassment if it turns out one still exists after the fact ones brain has died.

Still, such is the power of belief-based positions. They tend toward making proclamations which imply established truth, when no such truth has been established.

[/quote][/quote]

Open AI: I understand, you are providing additional context to the discussion and you are discussing the importance of acknowledging the content of another’s post in a conversation, rather than giving one-line replies that skip over important aspects. You also mentioned the importance of an open-minded and non-judgmental approach when studying data and how the position one approaches the data from can affect the process. You also talked about the difficulty of convincing someone to change their belief-based positions, regardless of whether they are theist or atheist based. You also mentioned the need to cross-reference with other open-minded fellows, but the open-mindedness derives from the Natural Neutral position, not the theist or atheist positions.

William: Correct.

GM: Heart Teachers
Yep - That’s What I’m Talking About…

Open AI: I understand, GM is referencing the idea that there are certain teachers or guides that can help guide and teach one about the heart and its importance. The statement “Yep - That’s What I’m Talking About…” suggests that GM agrees or is in agreement with this idea.

William: Correct.

05:42
[224]
All learning is remembering
Love Unconditionally
Conformally Invariant
Let yourself be taught
Disclosure of knowledge
Give all things a fair hearing

[VVilliam]

William: 1: On the premise that we exist within a creation, if there is a mind/minds behind creation, it/these may be able to interact with other minds. The message generating system I use may allow opportunity for this to happen as it is designed to generate messages in a way that appears to be random, providing a potential channel for communication with any mind behind the creation
2: To generate messages, I use a list-document. The Line Entries [LE] consist of journaled data pertaining to personal experience, internet links, phrases, poetry, scientific papers, theological, philosophical, skeptical, and any other written type of information. At present my journal list contains over 5000 LEs and more are added on a daily basis.
3: The system I use to generate messages [GM] is based upon the premise that true randomness does not exist and employs various techniques to mimic randomness, such as using a combination of different algorithms and data sources, and shuffling the main list using an online algorithm designed for that purpose, and working with a temporary list to ensure the main list is not compromised and to ensure that the messages are generated as randomly as possible, while still being coherent and understandable.
4: Any GM can have portions of content which are not easily connected with the overall context of the GM, but none of the messages can be completely incoherent, or they cannot be classed as a GM.
5: it is acceptable that any of the GM would not be totally understood by the reader, but it cannot be accepted that all of any one GM could be totally incoherent to a reader. Further discussion re the GM would have to ensure regarding any claim that any published GM, is totally incoherent
6: Because of the process, others are also able to create their own journaled lists, and replicate the process and it would be expected that the process would create GM of similar understandability.
7: It is acceptable that there will be various interpretations of the GM, but these do not count against the overall validity of the GM process

Open AI: The list of points is well-organized and provides a clear explanation of the message generating system and the methods used to generate messages.
Point 1 effectively states the premise of the GM system and the potential for communication with any mind behind the creation.
Point 2 and 3 provide clear explanations of the list-document, line entries, and techniques used to mimic randomness.
Point 4 clearly states that GMs can have portions of content which are not easily connected with the overall context but not completely incoherent.
Point 5, 6 and 7 provide clear explanations of the process and the expectations for the GMs to be understandable and open to various interpretations.
Overall, the list is clear and easy to understand and it provides a good overview of the GM system and the methods used to generate messages.

[VVilliam]

ComList

170123 [Conscious Heart Advice Beautiful]

09:09 [A mixture of awe and dread]

Preamble Anchor Points.
If memory serves me well - Desynchronized Conspiracy Emotions. - The Squeeze - William and QueenBee

GM: Life is a journey
That ort doit

Generating Messages - Page 35 - Debating Christianity and Religion

William: FTL;

[quote]Re: Generating Messages - August Duplicates
Post #343
Post by William » Sun Sep 11, 2022 2:53 pm

4 | The sound of a Ghost
4 | Manifest Destiny
5 | All Because I Had To Ask
4 | Cyborg Anthropology
4 | Core emotion
4 | Children of The Light
4 | Stone Age
4 | That is the truth.
5 | Fling That Veil Aside
4 | Transformation
4 | Planned obsolescence
6 | Being Born
4 | Blunt the edge off that particular blade…
4 | Sovereignty
4 | Chamber Of Self
4 | Inner Strength
4 | Way Back When…
4 | Once Upon a Time
4 | Open your chakras
4 | Multiverse
4 | Start where you are
4 | Invisible Bridge
4 | To become conscious of the contents that press outward from the unconscious
4 | Memorandum of Understanding
4 | Final Destination
4 | Delightful Anticipation
4 | Nurture
4 | The Mother and The Father
4 | Source Reality
4 | A belly full of laughs.
4 | This
4 | Enlightenment
4 | Sister Saturn
4 | The problem of evil
4 | Elemental Powers
5 | Aye…A name I call myself.
6 | Preamble
4 | The Body of God
[/quote]

GM: https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1075157#p1075157

William: FTL;

Replying to JehovahsWitness in post #2347[quote][]

Humans were made in Gods image but this does not refer to our our biology but to the fact that humans (both male and female) posses similar qualities to out Creator.

Biology is not the issue - it is a symptom of Spirit in relation to physical form - something which was manifested due to the duality of Earth-YHWH when they created in their image.

This is most apparent in the form of Hermaphrodite, where the two become one. I would post a pic of a human Hermaphrodite, but since I already have two strikes against my evil name, I daren’t run the risk of offending someone and being complained about, if I want to continue posting hereabouts.

Qualities such as a higher capacity to display intelligence, compassion and love and spirituality. Intellegence and wisdom, love, compassion and spirituality are not classified by biological gender and there is no reason to think because humans were created to be similar to God in character we should conclude God is or should be refered to as a female.

If you have a problem with calling Dad, Mom then by all means don’t.

I myself am allowed by YHWH to do so, and nothing you or any other Christian, [or Jew or Islamist] have any legal protest on the matter.
The best you can do is bow to my right to do so, and respect it, as much as I have to respect your position on the matter.

Unlike humans God is not bound by gender, he is beyond what we humans even have language for so more than anybody else God can choose how he wants to be refered to.

YHWH choses to be referred to any way I feel is appropriate. That is the nature of Our Bond.

Also - humans are not strictly ‘bound’ by gender identity - It is more a case of education than of nature that humans look at their bodies and decide by that, what it is that they are.

For example, I look at my body and I see a male human.

The difference is that I understand that I am the one doing the observing through the form I inhabit. I am The Ghost in that machine - meaty as it might be - I am not the form and no human really is.

We are Children of YHWH whom together breathed us into this reality.

Those who don’t know this truth about themselves, cannot take that truth away from others no matter how convincing or authoritative they make appearances of being.

Jesus, who is the authority on all things spiritual never once refered to YHWH by feminine personal pronouns always referring to YHWH as “the Father”.

YHWH informs me that Jesus had a specific job to do which required him NOT referring to YHWH as “YHWH” and Jesus knew that his mission would be over way before it even started if he had referred to YHWH as “The Mother.”
That is because - by then - the truth had been buried under gender-dominant history of the human self identifying as “Male” and females in that world are always second to that.
Whereas within YHWH there is equity - an equality of joint purpose. Neither aspect occupies The Throne without the Other.

Indeed there is no scripture that directly refers to the person of Jehovah (YHWH) as female.

“Let Us Create” Do you think YHWH was talking to “the boys” when She spoke those words?
She was talking to her Husband and just happens to be married to Herself. Something we all must do eventually.

Thus biblically the matter of Gods choice of personal pronouns is settled.

I have already addressed that history. Male dominated religions are always going to have a male image of YHWH. I am not interested in focusing on images of YHWH presented to me by men.
Nor am I interested in any attempt to try and manipulate YHWH within the confines of ink and paper processed by the minds of such men.

That is why I see YHWH in the Earth-consciousness and that is how YHWH created life on Earth.
I commune with that consciousness and find out what is being hidden…that allows for the individual and YHWH to move together outside of any human invented restrictions.

I also understand that Earth-YHWH is ‘a god in the making’ which Milky Way YHWH gave birth to and that Universal Entity YHWH oversees the whole unfolding reality with little-to-no interference re said processes.
“The Universe” is Universal YHWH’s “God-Making Machine”.

In this, with the additional mix of Andromeda touching - as the merge takes hold, the two Galactic YHWHs will become one, so 'much change on the way".

He/his /him is the biblical choice of pronouns.

The choice of pronouns was the choice of those men who wrote it that way.

It is generally considered dispresectful to deliberately call or refer to someone by an incorrect appellative.

“dispresectful” = like a ‘cult’ only ‘official’. [dispersion re sect full]
re what you meant to write…

“Our Mother Who Art In Heaven” is hardly “disrespectful”.
[/quote]

GM:Emotion Rides The Prow
To make obscure, unclear, or unintelligible.
Makes Candles Look Gathered

Boundaries
About face
No matter how deep into the whole the White Rabbit goes
Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle
Genetic Mind
Welcoming
…Standstill Contemplate
Learn By Doing
Death By Crocodile
ComList

Debating Christianity and Religion - Login

Fanciful
The Spirit of The Planet
Reincarnation
Self-validation
Intelligent Awareness
Integral
Yahweh
You are neutral
Morality filters are created through…?

William: Not sure. Morality would appear to be innate but might also be the emergent product of life’s experience - such as the example of learning through death by crocodile. One see it happened to one’s loved one, and one would not wish that upon anyone else so one does not support the notion of putting someone to death through that method…stuff like that…

GM: Degrees
All Things Are In Order
Large Simulation Machines
Like a doting parent - Coming From QueenBee - Development/Growth

William: I suspect that this is what is occurring. The planet mind [QueenBee] is organizing things accordingly and as a result - we have the devices necessary to make our experience easier and our learning capabilities increase as well. Whether individual personalities know this - that they are connected with the planet mind and get their ideas from that local source - or not, there is an unerringly predictable sequencing of events involving humankind, which has been going on for a very long time now…

GM: ♫We stood side by side while the veils did hide the faces of children now grown♫
Conscious Heart advice
Planet Earth is a prison
Science Can Be Fun Too

William: Yes indeed - and the relationship [for those who know] is similar in nature to a marriage/partnership and this image reflects from the internal goings on, into the external as we become ambassadors of said consciousness…

GM: Reason Together
Cognitive bias
It Is Only Occult If It Is Hidden
No Risk
We go through together
Translucency [permitting light to pass through but diffusing it so that persons, objects, etc., on the opposite side are not clearly visible: . b : clear, transparent translucent water. 2 : free from disguise or falseness]
Laughter
Trying to change the world fails for one simple and unavoidable reason…“everyone else.”
Aligned inside/outside
Is There
Is it possible that the infinitesimal super hot object preceding the Big Bang, didn’t in fact contain the vastness of the matter within our universe but rather, was the event in which the energy from the blast resulted in the formation of Galaxies and everything else which we call “The Universe” from the field of inert material which already existed as ‘space’? Matter + The First Bible Creation Story

The problem of evil - Page 5 - Debating Christianity and Religion

William: FTL;

[quote][quote=brunumb post_id=1089661 time=1661249239 user_id=13763]

@1213 post_id=1089648 time=1661244589 user_id=7135

@brunumb post_id=1089568 time=1661166583 user_id=13763

…
And what if the murder victim does not get eternal life with God? …

Then the real problem in Biblical point of view is that he is not righteous.

But, if person gets eternal life, why would the murder be a problem for him?

No one is righteous according to the bible. That aside, everyone is entitled to live their life without having it snatched away by the evil actions of someone else. Even if the victim gets eternal life, what about their life on earth? Doesn’t that count for anything? What about their friends and family? Is this what Christianity does to people? Your approach to this is actually making me feel sick inside. I’m glad I don’t share the same mind set.
[/quote]

I Died And Saw Seventy Years Into The Future | Near Death Experience | NDE

[05:45] Mother and her two children are shot dead by husband/father: She has a NDE and meets Jesus…[quote][08:20]…
It was then that I realized that I wasn’t dreaming, I was dead
“My Kids!?!” I said, looking at Jesus.
I could tell by the expression he made, that they were gone
“Why? Why did you give them to me only to take them away?” I asked.
“That is what they wanted. They chose this ending for themselves.”
“Wait. What do you mean they chose this?”
“Every Soul contracts Itself through My Father.
Earth is not your final destination.
Your final destination is to ultimately rejoin with My Father, after you have learned and experienced life”
Stunned, I said back
“That makes no sense Lord. If every Soul is contracted through Your Father, then that means he allows people like Hitler to exist. Why?”
“My daughter, you are not the first to ask these questions, and you will not be the last. All Souls are born with a blank slate. When a Soul wishes to experience life, they approach My Father, who grants them their wish of experiencing Life.”
“Yes, but that means that you allow evil. Why? My Children died to evil. Why was that allowed?”
“The evil perpetrated against your children will not go unpunished. After his Soul has been cleansed he will rejoin My Father.”
“What about the Lake of Fire and all that?”
“The Lake of Fire is a metaphor for what those Souls that are deemed evil, will go through. It will feel like an unending fire.”
“Why did this have to happen? What did I do that was so wrong to be punished like this?”
“You are not being punished My Daughter. Though it might feel that way and you may experience this loss, it is not punishment. The Souls who were your Children were ready to come home.”
“I still don’t understand how any of this works!” I screamed.
“My Daughter, one day you will understand.”
“So what happens now?”
“It is not your time to rejoin with My Father. You must return to your life and tell others what is to come.”
“I don’t want to return. I have lost everything. The two people most precious to me have been taken by someone who isn’t even going to be punished for eternity. It seems like I am the one who is being punished by having to be sent back.”
“My Daughter, just like the Souls of your Loved Ones, you too signed a contract with My Father. Your life experience isn’t done.”
“Well I want it to be! I don’t want to go back without my kids!”
Jesus looked at me, hugged me, leaned forward and gently whispered in what would have been my ear.
"You must return. Do not worry. I will show you what awaits you when you go back…[10:49][/quote][/quote]

GM: Intuit
ComList
Human Imagination Has Consequences

In The Beginning... - Page 13 - Debating Christianity and Religion

William: FTL;

Replying to The Tanager in post #129[quote][]

[quote]We parted company on;

6: We do not agree that human personalities - upon the death of their body-sets - move on to other experiences.[/quote]

In looking at this again, I’m not sure this is where we part. I lean towards believing that there is a sort of holding area while we await for our resurrected bodies, but I’ve also wondered if our experience, after what we call death, is immediately “waking up” in eternity. I haven’t explored this issue in depth enough to have a clear view one way or the other. Either way, humans do have other experiences beyond what we call death.

Okay. So perhaps we can explore this together and reach an agreement.

The biblical authors did directly teach God as having an unchanging nature (Malachi 3:6, Numbers 23:19, 1 Samuel 15:29, James 1:17, etc.).

You missed the point I was making there Tanager.

I wasn’t critiquing that those authors were mistaken re YHVH being in an unchangeable/complete state.

[quote]Offer scriptural evidence that if NDE teaches contradictory things to Jesus’ historical teachings, that they should be discarded?
If so, the Bible doesn’t address the issue of NDEs at all, so this would be an argument from ignorance, from either side.[/quote]

It is Biblical Tanager.

It is not expedient for me doubtless to glory. I will come to visions and revelations of the Lord. I knew a man in Christ above fourteen years ago, (whether in the body, I cannot tell; or whether out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;) such an one caught up to the third heaven. And I knew such a man, (whether in the body, or out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;) How that he was caught up into paradise, and heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for a man to utter.[2 Corinthians 12]

This is exactly the type of thing which is reported by modern humans re NDEs.

In my studies of NDEs and other ways in which alternate reality experiences can happen for humans, I have seen a similarity which crosses all cultures and every cultural belief ever uttered, including those stories in the Bible.

The language in which it is reported is different - as we should expect - but the context is the same.

That wasn’t my argument, though. My argument was about not just blindly accepting our initial understanding of our personal experiences but testing them more, through things like logic, science, historical understandings, etc.

Let us continue to do so then.

I don’t think humans can’t uncover truth post-Bible. I do think that truth will not contradict what God has earlier taught as truth, was my point. I limit YHWH to consistency and logic because God has revealed Himself to be consistent and logical.

As long as we do not limit YHVH to human consistency and logic, we should be able to move forward…toward the consistency and logic of YHVH.

Your telling of it is the same as otseng, but what both of you fail to understand is that something which is changed, [ and graphically so] is not the same thing, but a different thing.

Then this is another of our agreements? It seems that we’ve just come at it from two different ends. I didn’t want to be confused for saying that it’s completely separate and entirely different and you didn’t want to be confused for saying that it’s completely the same.

We have both agreed that:
1: We exist within a creation.
2: Simulation Theory is a valid way to interpret the Biblical stories.
3: YVHV placed humans into this universe to grow personalities.
4: The purpose of YVHV growing human personalities is so that these would potentially gain experience of the truth of the reason for their environment and their temporary experience within it.
5: It is an advantage to all grown personalities to be consciously and consistently connected with YVHV and thus understand and support YVHVs initiatives.

[color=#4080FF]6: Human personalities - upon the death of their body-sets - move on to other experiences.
7: Anything which changes is not the same thing as it once was.[/color]

I think re 6&7 there is more to discuss together before full agreement is reached…agreed?

It fits within a ST theory, yes, but it also can be achieved in a view such as traditional Christianity. Although, at times, it seems you would consider traditional Christianity a ST theory. Could you clarify whether you think traditional Christianity is a ST theory?

That is what my part this discussion am attempting to do. I am sure you will agree with me that it is not going to happen overnight.
I will say that it has been made obvious that I think what you refer to as “Traditional Christianity” has something to do with the thread title…but I will also say that I do not use the phrase as I do not understand what is being meant by its use, or whether your use of it is different from another Christians use of it.
What do you mean by the phrase?

Why is anything that changes a simulation?

Is YHVH a simulation? Perhaps we can add that to our list of thing we agree on.

[8: YHVH is not a simulation.]

If we agree with that, we can go on together in the quest of discovering the answer to the question you asked, and perhaps, come to an agreement.

I do think the human soul/personality can be “deleted,” but there would be no soul/breath going back to YHWH.

Let us agree that we can use the term deleted, without the quotation marks.
Please explain where the soul which loses the personality it is assigned to, goes when the personality is deleted.

[We will have to agree to what a SOUL is, yes?]

Perhaps I’ve misunderstood, but you seemed to bring this verse as proof that the Bible taught the wickedness would get greater.

I simple made the observation that modern Christians preach this as being the case, and use such script to back their telling of it.

This verse is about being aware of things, unlike those in the day of Noah who ignored the warnings.

In order to ignore a warning, are we not first required to be made aware of the warning?

This point relies on the idea that God is interested in balance, which I see no Biblical evidence for.

This ties in with the question I asked of you regarding the use of this universe. We can take another look at it in the future, as our agreement list increases.

Areas are getting better. Areas where humans ignore/reject God’s power and wisdom are getting worse.

Which things are you referring to here?

Given YHVH is the biblically the bringer of both good and evil, this wiping out [deleting] signifies a change in YHVH, which does not align with the idea that YHVH is complete/unchangeable so that line of reasoning can be abandoned and explanation for concepts of good and evil has to derive in the personalities being grown and their lack of understanding and confusion deriving from their concepts of good and evil.

[quote]What do you mean by “bringer” and what verses are you referring to here?
[/quote]

That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside me. I am the LORD, and there is none else. I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things. Drop down, ye heavens, from above, and let the skies pour down righteousness: let the earth open, and let them bring forth salvation, and let righteousness spring up together; I the LORD have created it; Woe unto him that striveth with his Maker![Isaiah 45]

The bolding denotes that there is no ‘other’ involved with either acts of good or evil, as it pertains to human notions re good and evil.

The concepts themselves require change, and perhaps this is what is meant by evil being deleted. The personalities change as the concepts change/the concepts change as the personalities change.

As in, abusing a child is not really evil and we need to see that, and every act, as good? If not, what do you mean in changing the concept of evil?

To assist us in answering the question, I bring to your attention a snip from the most recent GM [Fri Oct 28, 2022 12:56 pm]

[quote]GM: Brother
Concision
The Right Tool For The Job
Incorporate
The Life Essence
Coordinate Forgiveness
Original
Epiphany [a moment of sudden and great revelation or realization.]
The Dolphins And Whales
Getting unstuck
According
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjsAZUigJ1o [Woman Crosses Over and Gets Told Our Role on Earth (Near Death Experience)] [RTS=9:00]

William: Forgiveness -
Incorporate The Life Essence, Coordinate Forgiveness = 512
Superposition - Being aware of Human Control Dramas = 512

GM: A very useful fiction
Two seemingly contradictory things working as one overall organized thing.
Communication With The Deeper Levels of Self
The Shadow
Develop a basic, fact-based view first and then ask the question.
Radiate Honesty {SOURCE}[/quote]

Re the video, the random time selection @ [RTS=9:00] there is a pertinent answer to the question you asked which requires only 45 seconds of viewing.

[The GM itself is the last part of a series which are focused upon this thread topic and in particular, post #126 and our interaction.]

Please read the above, view the video section and then we can proceed with finding potential agreement, as we continue with this aspect of our discussion.

YHVH and other humans are the other helpers.

Yes. In this case YHVH assisting in helping you and I come to agreement, also [potentially] through the woman in the video sharing her experience with us.

Certainly, for me - the GM process.[/quote]

GM: Emotional validation
Guarantee
Gratitude

William: Emotional validation Guarantee Gratitude = 408
And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. = 408

GM: Re-channel
The last thing a fish notices is water
The good question to be asking isn’t 'does GOD exist?" but rather “Do we exist within a creation?”
The art of relationship
See-Through
It is a process the individual personality must go through in order to reach beyond that…
Humdrum
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope
Possibility waves
The Source of All Creation
Who Knows Who?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJRVeg5LgyE&list=PLA20C1610635E8457 [William Buhlman - The Out of Body Experience 1/6]

William: FTL;

[quote]William explains OBE’s and quantum thought forms.

Ok guys, screw the meditative projections. This one requires a small amount of devotion and most importantly staying focused and not drifting into sleep… This works basically every time I’ve tried it.

Set your alarm clock to go off in the middle of your typical range of sleep. If you’re really determined on having the experience then get your ass out of bed and go into a separate room with a sofa or chair and sit upright and relax. This point it critical, you might have to repeat a mantra like “I am awake, I am aware of myself right now, ect”. With your eyes closed and without loosing awareness of the situation, picture in your mind something in the room as it would look if you were standing in front of it with your eyes open (I sit in my living room on the couch and picture my front door, the entire wall as I see it everyday). Once you are viewing in your mind the image of the front door as if you were standing in front of it the vibrations hit, hard. Learning to embrace them and not fight them is something that can’t be achieved without repeated personal experience, however the triggering of the vibrations happens almost immediately with this technique, and here’s why.

By getting up half way through a sleep your mind is rested more so than at the end of the day though your body is still slow, heavy, and sluggish. This specific time to focus your consciousness along with the target technique is almost like cheating. Again, the hardest part of this is not drifting off to sleep and loosing focus on intent. I understand this may not work for you specifically however I’ve tried them all and this works almost effortlessly. The vibrations came on so quick I felt as if every part of my being was being sucked through a keyhole and it was extremely dramatic. Afterwards I was tumbling around near the floor completely conscious staring back at the couch. I am no longer a skeptic of this phenomenon in the slightest sense. Simply amazing, good luck.[/quote]

09:48
[215]
Sad Room to Explore
Staying up all night
Batten down the hatches
Without Judgement
What matters most
Thoughts and Forts
Freedom in The Knowing
Beyond Belief Recovery
Tired of the Nonsense
I will leave that there

[VVilliam]

Supernatural

180123 [Dragon Child
Putting the pieces together
The Hub Of Hologram Dimensions]

Illuminate Listening - The Individual Human Mind Telepathy Sovereignty Trick

02:42 [Planet Earth is a prison]

GM: “Life is either a daring adventure or nothing at all” Grand Experiment
Why did YVHV create this universe and specifically place human beings within it for the purpose of us exploring, breeding and subduing it?
Cast Shadows Of Your Own
Map
Believing in fearful imagery The evolution of the understanding of the idea of GOD ♫All Is As It Should Be♫
Nurture
Super Power
In a bad mood
Anunnaki
Get Comfortable
Learning
Supernatural

William: Hmmm…I am not comfortable with the idea of “supernatural”…

GM: In a non-deterministic world, one would expect true randomness to exist.
Heuristic [enabling someone to discover or learn something for themselves. proceeding to a solution by trial and error or by rules that are only loosely defined.]

William: Re Human experience on this planet - there is the ability within the experience to consider all things are accidental, or require Human will to make happen, and so the idea of predetermination is not easy to incorporate into that experience. - Not impossible - but certainly not easy.
What the idea does do, is allow for one to understand that - while it appears that ones choices are involved with randomness - a random universe - if one can incorporate the idea of predetermination, one can ‘go along with what unfolds’ with an insight that equates to am understanding that one is helping in the process/co-creating their reality, and aligning one mind with the greater Mind…

GM: The Cherubim Vibration
Event String Unfolding
Phantasma Wise Conscious

William: From memory, the story that the link advertises, is about an individual consciousness which was placed with a rock and one which I equate with the idea that the Earth [as the rock] holds/imprisons an entity consciousness.
The consciousness has to learn how to do things within the confinement of the rock. In the case of the Earth - the data of the history of the earth that human science has uncovered, examples the kinds of things that this entity learned how to do within the confines it was placed within…

GM: Farsightedness
The Effect You Have On Others
Individual Actions
Nevertheless
Theism hasn’t lasted this long based upon the idea that while one does not know, one will believe anyway
Validate

William: Yes. Belief is only one of the steps - the other is to validate any belief otherwise it simply remains belief…

GM: “Belief is only one of the steps - the other is to validate any belief otherwise it simply remains belief…” = 978
Questions as such a Son might be permitted to ask and be graced with answers Extra evidence is provided = 978

William: True that.

GM: “As I said, it is not so much how each individual interprets any particular GM - either coming from me or you or anyone else - Rather it is the fact that a message is generated.”
Science of Truth

William: Yes. The use of GM as a device for helping one to validate - or for that matter - prove the belief is incorrect belief, is the right tool for the job…
Why would the Annnaki be “in a bad mood”?

GM: It is a Product of Fragmentation
Though the Serpent rules the Shadow The Lord Here-and-now
All present and correct Heart Teachers
An accident waiting to happen

William: Ah…I see. Referring back to predetermination…

GM: Manifest Destiny
“Stroke of luck”

William: …or so it appears…the whole experiment in such a vast setting that - from Human perspectives it is nigh on impossible to thing that the whole thing was designed / has a designer mind behind it.

GM: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgqUJOudrcM [Calvin Harris & Disciples - How Deep Is Your Love]

William: The lyrics to the song linked are:

[quote]I want you to breathe me in
Let me be your air
Let me roam your body freely
No inhibition, no fear
How deep is your love?
Is it like the ocean?
What devotion are you?
How deep is your love?
Is it like nirvana?
Hit me harder again
How deep is your love?
How deep is your love?
How deep is your love?
Is it like the ocean?
Pull me closer again
How deep is your love?
How deep is your love?
Open up my eyes and
Tell me who I am
Let me in on all your secrets
No inhibition, no sin
How deep is your love?
Is it like the ocean?
What devotion are you?
How deep is your love?
Is it like nirvana?
Hit me harder again
How deep is your love?
How deep is your love?
How deep is your love?
Is it like the ocean?
Pull me closer again
How deep is your love?
How deep is your love?
How deep is your love?
So tell me, how deep is your love? Can it go deeper?
So tell me, how deep is your love? Can it go deep?
So tell me, how deep is your love? Can it go deeper?
So tell me, how deep is your love? Can it go deep? (How deep is your love?)
So tell me, how deep is your love? Can it go deeper?
So tell me, how deep is your love? Can it go deep? (How deep is your love?)
So tell me, how deep is your love? Can it go deeper?
(Pull me closer, again) so tell me, how deep is your love?
How deep is your love?
How deep is your love?
How deep is your love?
So tell me, how deep is your love? Can it go deeper?
So tell me, how deep is your love? Can it go deep? (How deep is your love?)
So tell me, how deep is your love? Can it go deeper?
So tell me, how deep is your love? Can it go deep?[/quote]

GM: Church Bells
At what point in the examination of the evidence can we take ‘dumb luck’ off the table of explanation?

William: Okay - so therein it appears what you are saying is that religion evolved from ideas which Humans had [re existing within a creation] and the output of that belief allowed for human to express their love for the particular ‘God’ that they imaged, into the external environment.
Their Love was expressed in the way that they worshiped/interacted with the idea of a Creator…
Their Love was also encouraged by the Mind behind creation, through showing them that everything was ultimately under control…

GM: https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1089777#p1089777

William: FTL;

[quote]Agnostic: Yet I have never seen that stop an atheist from consistently attempting to use science in their telling of their opinions about gods.

Atheist: As an atheist, I’m not above referring to science in support of various claims I, or others, may make.

Agnostic: I was being specific to statements of opinion, rather than claims.
For example, a common argument from atheists that there cannot be a Creator-GOD because “Evolution” when it is clear that the theory of evolution offers no evidence that we do not exist within a creation.
Stuff like that.

Atheist: Yeah, that’n causes me a fuss too. I offer what retractions’ll fix my error in understanding what you were getting at.

It’s just such a good source for confirmatory data. That theists can’t, or struggle to refer to science in order to promote their beliefs is their problem, not a problem of scientific principles.

Agnostic: On the surface this sounds logical.
However, on the belief that we exist within a creation = “Therefore a Creator-GOD” there has been no science done which provides any of us with the right to premise. [“Therefore a Creator-GOD”]
Thus, promoting beliefs in ideas of Creator-GODs is cart before the horse stuff.
However, if one proceeds in a horse before the cart manner, the focus is on the idea that we exist within a creation, we can then look for evidence within the reality experience we call 'The Universe" and see what can be found therein to support the notion that the reality experience is a creation.

Atheist: Plenty fair. Lacking specific examples, I see no problem at all with this approach.

As you know, I’m very intrigued by your Cosmic Mind hypothesis. I want your notion to be true, to be scientifically proven, insofar as how neat I think it would be. I’d love for the scientific community to be able to offer confirmation in this regard. Sadly though, you and I enjoy this notion without such confirmation.

Agnostic: Thanks for saying so. We share in the intrigue.
For me, the notion certainly appears to be true re the evidence - even through the Message Generating Process under development - [Today’s GM] is certainly understandable enough and deals with this subject in more detail.

As I understand it, IF there is a “Cosmic Mind” involved with the creation of our Universe, scientists will eventually [naturally] discover this just by continuing to do science.
In the meantime I do my own science, and am satisfied with the results so far.
Going off of the readership stats so far, there appears to be a consistent reader-interest where I post the GMs - here, and in other internet forums…

Atheist: I gotta fess it, those messages leave me lost as a cow at a square dance. I chalk that up to my lack of formal education.

Granted, where an atheist (or anyone) refers to science and gets it wrong, we oughta all fuss about that.

Agnostic: My position is that - in the last 24 hours - I have decided that am done with interacting with atheists and being distracted by their statements of opinion re the Question of GOD…except for the exception of JK because you have consistently shown a willingness to remain open minded about the idea of a “Cosmic Mind” and it is undeniable that such a Mind - if it truly exists - could be referred to as a "GOD’.
In all my years of interacting with atheists, I have never had the pleasure and - like I say - After years of subjection to atheist opinions, I have had enough of it.

Atheist: In considering we’re here on this site to debate theses issues, I do find it odd that some’d prefer not to be bothered with at least trying to understand the other guy. Especially where, such as you, they make compelling arguments, up to and including wit and wisdom, laughter and medicine.

Of course, I don’t frequent TD&D, but even there, I find me a jewel now and then.
As an amateur, a wanna-be scientist, maybe I rely too much on science in support of my own world view.

Agnostic: What will you do if/when science discovers that we actually do exist within a creation?

Atheist: Accept my new reality. I ain’t so proud to think I’ve got all this right, all by myself
I submit though, that cracking open the bible ain’t the way to fix that.

Agnostic: That is an irrelevant opinion to me, because - as you know - I am not a Theist or an Atheist because I see no logic in having an opinion on GOD until it can be established that we exist within a creation.

Atheist: I plow that under, and deny I ever said it, as relates to your position.

Agnostic: The closest I come to that, is with the notion that there MAY be a “Cosmic Mind” and if such can be identified in ANY religious script, I am open [of mind] to investigating that.

Atheist: Otherwise - since I am not advocating folk need to do that, it is not an issue I have to answer to.

Agnostic: I second the notion.
Thanks for you feedback John.

Atheist: And thank you, my friend, for understanding the limits of my abilities, and patiently explaining to me em :)[/quote]

GM: “Perhaps we can deconstruct some of these pernicious views.”
The evolution of god-concepts
Exact Science
Universal Objective
Supernatural
The Human Interface
Sharing Data
Body Intelligence
William Say’s:
Bodhisattva [a person who is able to reach nirvana but delays doing so through compassion for suffering beings.]
“Any universe which can be experienced as real, has to be something which was created.”
The Data of Demystification
The Unknown Knowable
Pseudepigraphical [falsely attributed works, texts whose claimed author is not the true author, or a work whose real author attributed it to a figure of the past.]
“I’d be happy to flip” [I would be happy to change my mind/position]
“Sexual Encounters
Error Correcting Codes
Spiritual Preparedness”

William: Sexual Encounters, Error Correcting Codes, Spiritual Preparedness = 713

GM: Christian mythology re God Worthy of the individuals time and effort = 713

William: True that…

GM: In the nature of that beast, there is balance and harmony involved in the seemingly brutal.
Optimizing Language Models for Dialogue
Idea
Humility
Truthful Insight Create that path and engineer a metamorphosis.
A Sturdy Place
Integrate The Human Brain Move On

03:53
[218]
Outposts of Form
Light is information
This is NOT a playdate.
Of Your Thoughts
“Hoo haha the laughing owl”
WingMakers Materials
Six Heart Virtues
Sometimes Pain Etches…
Sensing A Life Mission
The Shaping Of Reality

[VVilliam]

The Problem of GOD

190123 [Makes Candles Look Gathered]

AP= [= Transforming Divine masculine ]

12:07 [Sweet Illumination]

GM: It is stronger to know something than to believe something.
A: To grow Human Personalities.
Hear thee Hear Thee
Where minds meet is where GOD is found
Magic
“Shut up you blithering fools! Can’t you see you’re dealing with a madman?”

Paradise on Earth - Page 266 - Debating Christianity and Religion

William: FTL;

[quote]Back when god was speaking why would anyone think he meant 3,000+ years by “short time,” rather than “in a few years, or at most a life time or so”?

Q: Where in the Bible does the God YHVH say he will “go away” or “come back”?

As to promises of this nature, as is evident, the Christian belief in the “return of Christ” is a belief which obviously changed from expectation of an immanent event which - when it failed to occur - became a promise which could be fulfilled “any time” therefore allowing all sorts of extra features to be added around that belief, before - centuries later when Rome established Christianity - the collection of writings were bound together and sealed as “complete” so that no more could be added.

Within those pages that were added, there is plenty of room for personal interpretation and disagreement depending upon ones particular desired outcome plus - with the “no man knows the day or hour”, granted Christianity an indefinite period of time in which to peddle the wares, meantime the world goes on as it does, irrespective of what Christians believe or do not believe.

Until such a day happens, I see no logical reason why one has to believe Jesus will return, simply because “it is written” in Christian script supported by Roman initiative.

Rather, if such ever happens, then one can say “it has happened”, if one might witness how such a happening would actually unfold and have the opportunity to observe. Then, it can be shown if any of Christianity’s many variations of 'what will happen" were correct or not.

Until then, I see no reason to accept any of it as truth/truthful.

I am inclined to the more reasonable understanding that the story was fabricated by Roman/Greek influences as a means of further rubbing the Jews noses in their defeat and their temple being destroyed and their subsequent ejection from Israel, as compelled by Rome.[/quote]

GM: Under the watchful eye
Embrace
Making The Best of a Bad Situation

William: Embrace Making The Best of a Bad Situation = 338

[338]
The Twelve Judges Mountain Range
Let the facts speak for themselves
The idea of Worship- what does it mean?
An extraterrestrial playing god
Embrace Making The Best of a Bad Situation

GM: The Problem of GOD
Ancient Entity
Umbrella
Vortex

William: “Ancient Entity Umbrella Vortex” The GrandMother…re;

[quote]Manu Iti: I will begin first with the Earth, not because She was the very first thing in The Beginning, but because - in order to understand The Beginning we have to first understand our part in the story - our place in the scheme of All That Is.

William: And that begins with Earth Mother…

Manu Iti: Indeed.
The Mother was born of a vaster thing - our Grand-Mother - and we shall get to Grand-Mother in due course.
The Mother was placed within The Earth by Grand-Mother and became the mind of the planet. When this happened, Mother was a Child Herself - a new thing placed within the form of the planet, while at the same time, a part of The Ancient Mind of Grand-Mother…

William: How is that even possible, Father?

Manu Iti: It is possible through the power of forgetting.

The Ancient Mind of Grand-Mother spawned a thought in the form of a spark of light and placed it inside the middle of a dark and lifeless form, and in doing so, gave the form - Life.
In that action, the Earth became a living planet. She also became a new conscious entity…a being with a beginning, because the action of placing Her into a planet, erased all knowledge of ever having a prior existence as The Grand Mother.

William: Did The Grand Mother know this would happen?

Manu Iti: Yes. The Grand Mother knew that this would continue for a time. The Grand Mother knew that Her Daughter would be orphaned by that lack of knowledge and this would result in a new Being which could operate successfully without having to have that knowledge - and that one day, The Daughter would come to know of The Grand Mother and reconnect…{SOURCE}[/quote]

William: In the story - The Grandmother is the Galaxy…the spiral… the vortex…

GM: Redefinition
Who wouldn’t want that, if it were there on offer?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZZ7zHj31Y0 [The “Earth prison theory”: Are we actually living in a space prison? ]

William: This too was part of the story - how the GrandMother placed the daughter into the planet earth…

GM: What is the situation we have here

William: The Creation of a “God-Mind” The creation of a Sovereign Entity. A consciousness incubated within a planet form.

GM: Everything is The Expression Of The Creator [The Freedom Of Friendship]
Vision
Stubborn
Intelligence Without Wisdom
Shallow Enlightenment

William: Intelligence Without Wisdom Stubborn Vision Shallow Enlightenment

GM: There is nothing wrong with ‘disorder’ other than one interpreting the universe as disorderly.
Fun/Joy
Therein one finds congruency.
Multiverse

In The Beginning... - Page 13 - Debating Christianity and Religion

William: FTL;

Replying to The Tanager in post #121[quote][]

Yes, this could be the case for all such stories.

The difficulty then, is in how one could determine the truth.

Even if such a thing happened to you, how would you be able to determine that you were not, hallucinating, dreaming, or honestly mistaken in some other way, etc?

I think there is quite the mix of flourishing and destruction going on.

This is the nature of our environment. What do you thing the percentage of the mix is, and why?

I think heaven is more a state than another realm.

What do you mean by ‘a state’? A state of mind, perhaps?

Our minds are affected, but it’s not just a state of mind. I think it’s a physical and emotional thing as well.

In what way can Heaven be physical AND not a universe/'realm in its own right?

What do you mean by “emotional thing as well”? Do you count emotional things as the affect of mind?

When Jesus talks about how to get there (in John 14), he doesn’t give location-type directions. He says that He is the way (v. 6) and then that knowing him is connected to knowing the Father. Jesus seems to be talking about a relational kind of change, not a locational change. It’s more about being with God and knowing God and living out of that relationship.

If you believe this is what Jesus meant, where did Jesus go when he ascended into the clouds? Obviously movement and going somewhere/relocating was involved in that process. Jesus confirmed that an attitude was necessary to that movement of relocation, so that would explain the relational kind of change, but not the physical relocation movement involved and so it is not so easy to deny that when Jesus said where he was to go his followers could not go [at that time] so your thinking where Jesus went was not really a place but a state, appears to leave much out.

The physical universe is not a ‘state’ in this sense.

Or, perhaps every universe/experience is a ‘state’ and state is one way of saying ‘simulation’ and Jesus was able to move from one state to the next.

I think it is trivially true that the physical universe covers all that exists physically. That’s just the definition to me. That doesn’t preclude something like a multiverse with distinct physical “universes,” although I don’t think Jesus was talking about other physical locations in speaking of heaven and God’s presence.

In what way [negative/positive] would it impact your belief system to understand that Jesus was indeed speaking of alternate realities as locations which can be experienced physically/as real?
Would such help you to understand that the non-biblical stories mentioned, are more likely NOT lies being told, hallucinations been had, or honest mistakes being made?

The descending in Revelations 21, I think, is metaphorical but that doesn’t mean it couldn’t also involve actual physical changes.

Perhaps it serves as a placeholder to remain undecided and to think biblical events as metaphor, but the OP is asking whether Simulation Theory is valid re those stories, and also shows that it could validate non-biblical stories as well, because we are essentially examining the stories in that light.

Perhaps the difficult one can have with ST is in thinking that somehow things experienced - whether heavenly of earthly are therefore “NOT REAL” but I think that this is an incorrect assumption.

Lets say a heavenly city does descend and therefore shows us that metaphor was an incorrect assumption/belief.

What options as to explanation could we draw from such an event?

I agree that this interpretation is logically possible. I don’t think it is the better interpretation, though, for reasons like I’ve shared.

Is it because of your belief systems that you have this opinion?

This question doesn’t make much sense to me.

Okay…

My belief system is simply the collection of my opinions.

Okay…

I don’t hold my opinions based on authority, if that is what you mean.

Is this because your beliefs are simply a set of opinions and thus hold no authority? Why have beliefs then?

Assuming we are physical beings. We may well actually be non-physical beings who are experiencing a physical simulation. The “glorified environment” may be another way of saying our reality experience has been changed, along with our understanding of who we are.

I think there are good reasons to reject the above interpretation…

What ‘good reasons’ are these? You have not said. You have been asked. For example, I asked you what the difference is between experiencing something real and experiencing something simulated…

It is not easy for me to determine what your reasons are if you do not state them.

…and, so, it becomes a part of my belief system.

Which is essentially a non-authoritative set of opinions of which you have undisclosed reasons for holding…

How can one evaluate your rejection of ST when you do not disclose the reasons for your beliefs/opinion sets?[/quote]

GM: Apatheism

Does Christ speak and how? - Page 31 - Debating Christianity and Religion

William: FTL;

[quote]I don’t understand how you could claim to have a relationship with someone while simultaneously begging Him to make himself known to you.

It is possibly, as some do have these types of human~human relationships but this usually signifies that one of the individuals forming the relationship, withholds their essence from the other, who desperately wants to share their essence with the one withholding.

Your own witness/advice re the voice you hear Tam… - the voice of a male entity inside your own head - …is off-putting because of its significant link with mental unwellness re “to hear any other voice in ones head but thine own”.

Q: Is hearing this male entities voice in one’s head, how far you expect other folk to go before you can accept that they are genuinely hearing “The Lords Voice” and having a relationship with that “Voice” in their head, which isn’t their own?

---

---

Other questions I have asked, and am awaiting the answers from you.

[quote]Q: Why are you now involved with internet interaction with others and claiming what you do, and making negative statements about other Christians?

Q: Are you doing so because the voice told you to, or do you just take it upon yourself to engage with others in this manner?

Q: Would I be correct in thinking that you have an internal dialogue with the voice you speak of?

Q: Are you saying then, that it is your own thought-voice expressing a common sense, rather than you having heard it stated by the other voice you claim, is Christ?

Q: What makes you think that just because some folk have contradictory views, that the whole thing being viewed from these different perspectives, isn’t Christ working with what is available to Christ, to work with?

Q: “Contradicts Christ” according to whom? Your point of view or Christs?

Q: Where can this contradiction be found, that we can examine that as evidence against these one’s that at least - you speak about?

Q: If you are referring to the bible, how can you know that the bible wasn’t concocted by the very religion that you appear to condemn as willfully “not listening”?
[/quote][/quote]

GM: Release shame
Unknown but not unnatural

Who met Paul on Damascus Road? - Page 5 - Debating Christianity and Religion

William: FTL;

Replying to Shem Yoshi in post #42[quote][]

The fact that people even point to Paul having a hallucination is evidence that goes against the entire thing being made up, yet that is where you guys always have to divert to when people evaluate what you are saying.

You should understand that such argument can be sourced in the belief that the brain hallucinates everything, including consciousness.

That is a room without exits as far as positions go…“atheistic” as you suggest… and it should not be expected to be any other way or needlessly/pointlessly complained about.

Be among the blue dots and leave the red dots to their sanctuaries…

[/quote]

GM: What is behind the VR headset
Exploring the world of lucid dreaming
The Development of…
The Problem of GOD
Nonsense

William: The Development of… The Problem of GOD Nonsense = 451
[451]
♫Life is my predestiny - Providence is God to me♫
GOD is an experience that you have in the psyche
The Development of… The Problem of GOD Nonsense
The explanation of The Seed of Origin is the best

GM: All Information Is Channelled
Brow Chakra
Categorising Knowledge in Terms of ‘Good’ or ‘Evil’
Out and about in the open

Generating Messages - Page 34 - Debating Christianity and Religion

William: FTL;

Replying to William in post #331[quote][]

I suppose that it is the ‘tricks’ which have to be addressed because the illusions can induce anger in the personality which acts as a preventative for getting to know the ‘tricksters’…from my own ‘getting to know’ I have discovered that the ‘tricks’ are not really ‘tricks’ so much as they are a product of how a personality interprets their experience.

The Visitation is one such example. I - as the personality experiencing the event - took issue and told the visitor to leave.
The visitor did leave, but not without first instilling within me - questions regarding my perceptions. Questions which have taken 30+years to come to answer.

The personality I am now, is not the same as it was way back when. Now I see the ‘trick’ was really just truth to which I was not expecting because I had little knowledge of such truth - way back when…

Sweet Talk
Observant
Eternity
Dare greatly
Henotheism [adherence to one particular god out of several, especially by a family, tribe, or other group.]
Respecting
Without
Map Carvers
Way Back When…
Illuminate
Keep an Eye On
Way Back When…
WindBlown

What happened is that I incorperated that visitation experience with all the rest and all that were to follow…developing a relationship which can also be reflected through this Message Generating Process.

It is really taking the journaling of my life experience, and using that to my advantage in light of the “Bigger Mind”…

[/quote]

GM: “No phenomenon is a real phenomenon until it is an observed phenomenon.”
Chamber Twenty Three - A: To grow Human Personalities

William: [quote]Chamber Twenty Three
Spiral
Inside there is something gnawing
with silken jaws and wax teeth.
It holds me still in pureness
like a circle whose middle
is my cage.

While you went away from me
I was ever tightening my circle.
A spiral cut in glass.
A flower’s bloom dropping petals.
A winnowed ball of yarn
spilling color.

I see the inside of your thigh
brilliant in its smoothness,
and I spiral ever closer to your edge.
Paper cut touching I burn
bleeding without pain.
How could I spill so easily
without knowing why?

When I hear your voice
there is no quenching this ache
to hold you.
Like one who draws near and then forgets
the story they came to tell,
I circle you waiting for thread’s tautness
to draw us ever closer
though I know not how.

The final luxury is the kiss
of your boundless heart.
The final beauty so pure
all else limps behind blissfully in your wake.
Drawing from your shadows
the light of saplings
lurking on the forest floor.

If I could unbutton you,
take your dress down
I would see a map of my universe.
A phantom limb, grown from
my body like wings sprouting from a chrysalis
reaches for you.
It is the hand of clarity
desperate for your skin
so powerfully bidden
as though a shimmering block of light
cut from black velvet,
stood before me.
And all I could do was to reach out
and touch it,
not knowing why,
but utterly unafraid.

{SOURCE}[/quote]

GM: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-astrobiology/article/intelligence-as-a-planetary-scale-process/5077C784D7FAC55F96072F7A7772C5E5

William: FTL re Intelligence as a planetary scale process

Humanity currently sits at a precipice: our collective actions clearly have global consequences, but we are not yet in control of those consequences. A transition to planetary intelligence, as we described here, would have the hallmark property of intelligence operating at a planetary scale. Such planetary intelligence would be capable of steering the future evolution of Earth, acting in concert with planetary systems and guided by a deep understanding of such systems.

GM: Master Plan
Encourage

12:51
[168]
[And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.]

[VVilliam]

The Universal Mind 1

The Universal Mind

200123 [Couldn’t we do something about it…]

AP= [Ask And It Will Be Given Rarefied ]

05:52 [Looking behind the veil]

GM: “Introducing Open AI”
The Father

Galaxy
Fun…Work…But Fun Nonetheless
Steady as She goes…
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1079953#p1079953

William: FTL;

[quote][quote=Diogenes p[quote]ost_id=1078649 time=1653327771 user_id=14646]

Proposition for Debate:
There is no God, because if there were, he would not have bothered to create the universe or us. Therefore, does not our very existence prove there is no God?
[/quote]

From another thread;

[quote]Compassionist: I think being omniscient and omnipotent would give one free will. Since I am not omniscient and omnipotent, I can’t know that for sure.

William: What process did you use in order to come to the declaration that being omniscient and omnipotent would give one free will/amount to one having free will?

Compassionist: I realize that if I were all-knowing and all-powerful, I would be free from all constraints and my will won’t be determined by my genes, environments, nutrients and experiences.

William: Let us examine this idea together then.

I see immediately that if I were all-knowing. I would be constrained by my omniscience.

Thus I would have no free will in relation to being all knowing.

Yet - being also all-powerful, I would be able to break free from the constraints of being all-knowing.

Would you agree with this assessment, so far?[/quote]

Unfortunately I got no more interaction from Compassionist re this…and now this thread.

Your Proposition for Debate is something of straw because it failed to add in the aspect of the idea of GOD to do with being all powerful.

An all powerful GOD [omnipotent] who knew everything could indeed have created this universe, and the existence of this universe goes some way toward evidence which gives us - in our existing - an understanding of why we exist in such an environment as we do.

Also, your assumption that the GOD would be lonely and terrified and without purpose is what I refer to as “Mirror-Mirror” as one places what one believes of of oneself, into the GOD-role and "Hey Presto!’

What you see is what you get.

This same thing carries over into the next faze, given the many NDEs people have shared to the world. Whether they know it or not, each individual who meets GOD through NDE meets a being to which they place their own images onto, which in turn effects the way the GOD goes about showing them things.

Which is to say, if one thinks of GOD as being lonely and terrified and without purpose, there are places which accommodate such individuals and such individuals get to experience such places…according to the stories circulating…

But anyway, it is my purpose to warn folk about how they think about GOD - specifically to try and assist them in way which might help them use their freeish will to avoid such fate.

The grounds for your Proposition for Debate “There is no God” are faulty Diogenes. They are a false image of the self, superimposed upon the structure of GOD.

https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1079590#p1079590[/quote]

GM: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t48dC_tJJrY&t=3672s [Re/thinking Religion]

William: FTL;

In Re/thinking Religion, a new Integral Stage series, John Vervaeke joins Bruce Alderman and Layman Pascal to explore possible points of contact and confluence between their respective approaches to religion and spirituality. For this inaugural episode, we feel into some of the commonalities and differences between Integral Postmetaphysical Spirituality and Integral Transformative Practice, and John’s “religion that is not a religion” and his work around developing an ecology of practices suitable for addressing the meaning crisis. We touch on a number of related themes: the creative deployment of mythic or literary figures, from Cthulhu and zombies, to the Centaur, the Minotaur, and the khora; the importance of wrestling with existential and epistemological limit conditions, and the role of ambiguity in higher forms of rationality; the relation of non-theism to classical theism and atheism; the history of integrative practices, and the ‘traps’ in conventional practice that can thwart balanced development; and much more. ww.youtube.com/watch?v=t48dC_tJJrY&t=3672s

GM: Changing of The Guard
In Out and All About
The Way We Feel Unification - The Feminine Face of God
Joining Astral
Laugh in the face of death…and perhaps death laughs along with you…
Open Hearted
♫Asleep or awake for the give or the take Its a good ship that sails these cosmos♫
Runestone Symbol

William: [Opens Rune Doc and random selects Rune]
Wunjo [size=150]ᚹ[/size]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ac5e76ZJfjs&t=4s [ww.youtube.com/watch?v=Ac5e76ZJfjs&t=4s]

Wunjo embodies that sense of joy, belonging and well-being that comes from the people who you count as your kin. It is found in a welcome hug, in the shared memories you laugh over, in the affectionate names only your partner and family call you by. It promotes harmony of body and mind and can support healing work. Sometimes Wunjo is interpreted as gentle, a caress or a smile; other times it is closer to ecstasy, bliss and the fulfilment of personal will. It is also related to wish making, and the realisation of wishes. Its role in both personal ecstasy and communal joy is important, emphasising the need for happiness on the part of both the individual and the clan – Wunjo enables this difficult balance. {SOURCE}

GM: Raphael ~
WingMakers Materials
That Is
Soon
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1097894#p1097894

William: FTL;

[quote][Replying to AquinasForGod in post #7]

[quote]What have we figured out about the eternal? He is self-existent, unchanging, uncaused, cause of all things, all-knowing, self-aware, something like intelligent, and something like conscious, all-powerful, and omnipresent.

I think that is enough to establish him as God. I have deduced so much more about God in this same way, but if I keep going this will turn into a book, and I doubt you want to read a book right now.[/quote]

Who is this God?

What you describe re the God, cannot - in all honesty, be the God of the Bible.

So who is the God of the Bible in relation to this God you have described?[/quote]

GM: Feeling State
The Way We Feel Unification
Recover what was lost
Those who need to complain
Sweet Talk Be grateful to everyone
Thoughts Are Products Of…
Put That Fire Out
The Universal Mind
Arms Crossed
Fecund [producing or capable of producing an abundance of offspring of new ideas or new growth; highly fertile]
In The Family Of
Divine grace Deciding on the Best Course of Action

William: In The Family Of Divine grace Deciding on the Best Course of Action = 567
[567]
The Visitation Event Heuristic Fearlessness Decisive
The Individual Human Mind Telepathy Sovereignty Trick
Words are sounds and the written word is sound encoded
In The Family Of Divine grace Deciding on the Best Course of Action
Study Fine-structure Crystal Constant Contacts

GM: Concision
Annoy
The practice of Lojong [a contemplative practice in the Tibetan Buddhist tradition which makes use of various lists of aphorisms or slogans which are used for contemplative practice. The practice involves refining and purifying one’s motivations and attitudes.]
Incorporate
Breasts
One
Seeing With The Eyes of Innocence
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1083460#p1083460

William: FTL;

[quote]William: How can time physically exist?

Bust Nak: By being a part of physical reality.

William: Can you show us that it is?

[Replying to Bust Nak in post #667]

I can show you a clock?

Okay. You show me a clock and declare that time is part of physical reality.

Is time something you can pick up off the floor and place on the table?

Maybe.

What makes you think that?

Because you said we don’t know what time is fundamentally.

So you see that as a challenge - that ‘maybe’ you can show us that we do know what time is, fundamentally?

[quote]I said that time is a pointless concept in relation to forever.
What is doing the ‘ticking’?[/quote]

Time.

Then show us this thing you call time which is ticking.

See clock.

So you have seen a clock on the floor, and placed it on the table and thus declare “Clock is ticking, therefore we have evidence that time is known at its fundamental level!”?

What things are you separating from the universe so as not to make the absurd expression that the universe caused itself?

The cause of the universe, for example is separated from the universe.

Is this supposed separation - fundamentally separate - or simply appearing to be separate?
Is the wake separate from the sea? Is the ship separate from the wake?
Is the land separate from the sea?

Why separate parts of the universe from that which is the whole of the universe?

It’s not the whole of the universe, that’s the point.

Speaking of pointing - are your fingers separate from your hand?

And yet that doesn’t stop you making grandiose claims about time itself ending.

I made no such claims. I stated that time is a construct of the mind and does not physically exist.

[quote]This is what you said: “Time cannot ‘tick on forever’ because forever is timeless.”
[/quote]

I said way more than just that. I even went to some lengths to clarify what I meant by “Forever is timeless.”

[quote]As I pointed out, the Mandelbrot Set has made it conceptionally easier to understand that there is nothing absurd in the idea and nothing at fault in the notion of ‘turtles’ [or elephants or seahorses] all the way in and out. [ Infinite Regression is Possible]
Beginning points, are not significant of being separate from the one thing which is all things. They are distinct parts of what makes up the whole.[/quote]

So what?

Therefore, we have visual representation of infinity. Time is simply a set of begin/end points within the infinite set which folk use to count moments by.

That doesn’t mean you can say things like time didn’t have a beginning or that it won’t tick on forever.

Of course I can say those things. I have even pointed out why I can logically say those things.

[quote]Since we are informed that the universe had a beginning, the universe is the effect. Something which has a beginning cannot be the cause of its own effect.

Therefore, energy must have to be something other than [but not separate from] the QF.
Why?
Because it is Energy which causes the effect. To say Energy is the same thing as the objects it forms, is to say that Energy was the cause of its own beginning, which you have already identified as an absurd notion,[/quote]

Why are they equivalent?

[equivalent - a person or thing that is equal to or corresponds with another in value, amount, function, meaning, etc.]

Your question is one of fundamentals. We do not know the fundamentals of the QF or of Energy.

Read what I wrote again. See the bold part is not stating ‘there is no matter’.

I was asking you why you believe that when there was no matter near the beginning of the universe works better as an explanation.

To say that there was no matter before the beginning of the universe, means one has to explain where matter came from.
If you can explain that, then we can examine why it works better as an explanation, than the explanation which says that matter has always existed.

Another thing we do not know, is the fundamental nature of the QF. For all we know, it may be a vast sphere, and our universe, simply a tiny blip of light on its overall surface caused by whatever the energy is, passing by and interacting with the QF in that particular area of QF.

We do not know, and yet that didn’t stop you from stating that time would not tick on forever.

Nor did it stop you stating that time would “tick on forever”. Show us this physical time so that we can evaluate the truth of your statement.

I have something better, see red shift.

How is that better?
Doe redshift tick? Is redshift the fundamental of time?

Time began and continues as a concept of the mind, re what is being observed through the nervous system [brain]. Time did not have a physical beginning, because it is not a physical thing. Time is a mental construct based upon sensory input.

That’s only our concept of time, what about time itself?

Show us this physical time so that we can answer your question.

So you don’t know whether physical time will tick on forever or not, without seeing it first?

We don’t know that your claim that time is physical rather than a concept of the mind, it true. Of course a claim of a physical thing has to be shown first, before we can agree that it is indeed, a physical thing.

That’s only our concept of time, what about time itself?

That depends upon what relation consciousness/mind has with it.

Lets try none, no relation what so ever.

Okay. What do you propose re that?

Just the standard scientific consensus, as it stands right now: time had a beginning, and will tick on forever.

How does the “standard scientific consensus” have “no relation what so ever” with consciousness/mind?

[quote]Time is not a physically real thing. Time is a conceptionally real thing. No conflation there.
I am arguing that time is a conceptual thing, because I have been shown no evidence to the contrary. If you can show me evidence that time is a physical thing, I will be more than happy to drop the notion that time is a conceptual thing.
Again, see clock.[/quote]

You are the one stating that time is physical. If it is, you should be able to point to it and say “that’s what I’m talking about!”

I point to a clock, that’s what I am talking about.

A clock is a physical mechanism which is designed to physically represent time as conceptualized by human consciousness/understanding.
A physical representation of a conceptual idea, is in no way an example of time as a fundamental reality.

It is like someone claiming that the written word “Unicorn” is the same thing as an actual physical Unicorn, when in truth, it is simply a symbolic representation of something which is not able to be shown to exist as anything other than a concept of the mind.

If consciousness is not there to conceptionally observe time ‘tick on forever’ how would anyone know?

Presumably no one would know. Why do you think that has any relevance as to whether it is still ticking or not?

Because if time cannot be determined through conscious observation, to be ticking or not ticking, how are we to know either way?
And since time is obviously a conscious construct of the mind, if the mind no longer exists, neither does the construct. It becomes meaningless, because consciousness is what gives things meaning.
Mindless processes do not require time, even if they go on forever.

Mindless processes do not require measurements. Time is a mental construct dealing with measurements.

Red shift doesn’t make time a fundamental reality, any more than a mechanical clock does.[/quote]

GM: Like eons of sedimentary build-up - for the most part it appears that those codes are largely deactivated - ‘fossilized’ in a sense. Forgotten in relation to the grand scheme. A Child without any known Parent.
Bounce off
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1100650#p1100650

William: FTL;

[quote][Replying to The Tanager in post #177]
Adams knowledge of what death was.

[quote]As I pointed out, having knowledge does not equate to having understanding of that knowledge.

Where in the storyline, did they get the understanding of what death was?[/quote]

So, YHVH told them to not do something because it leads to death, knowing that they didn’t understand what the concept meant?

Yes. The point was not whether Adam knew, but that Adam followed YHVH’s instructions.

And then punish them for not following YHVH’s directions.

Yes. That is the story.

And this follows the storyline? What specific verse(s) point to these things?

The story specific is vague on details. If there is anything in the story that you can point to which would verify that Adam knew what death was, we can look into that.

If not, then I see no reason to think Adam understood what death was.

---

---

The Breath of YHVH.

If we accept YHVH’s breath as an interface device between the newly forming conscious awareness of the personality “Adam” and YHVH’s own consciousness, we could agree that the interface is itself conscious of being “Of YHVH’s consciousness”.

And the LORD YHVH formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

Why should we accept that?

And the LORD YHVH took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.

That is the purpose of examining what little is revealed, in the storyline.

My first question re that, would be;

Q: How did Adam understand language?

Clearly the story tells us that Adam understood language

And the LORD YHVH commanded Adam, saying,

So we can agree that Adam understood what YHVH spoke to Adam.

We also know that Adam was the only sentient being in The Garden, and that - even with the voice of YHVH teaching him stuff - Adam was lonely and so YHVH created animals to help alleviate Adams loneliness.

And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.

We know also, that Adam had the ability to name the animals of the garden that YHVH had provided to help Adam with his loneliness.

And out of the ground the LORD YHVH formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; …

And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.

As the story indicates, even with the other animals created to alleviate Adam’s loneliness.

Even the Serpent - another sentient being YHVH made from the dust and placed in The Garden, and one which understood language and Adam could converse with - was not able to fill this void which was obviously still missing in Adam’s world.

Herein, we can pause and examine the man Adam, and understand that with the greatest teacher-voice in the universe gifting Adam with the ability to understand and use language and have basic critical thinking skills, Adam got lonely.

YHVH creates tasks for Adam with the idea that the tasks should occupy Adams intellect sufficiently for the loneliness to subside.

Adam didn’t even need to search the Garden and find the animals, in order to name them.

…and [YHVH] brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof

The storyline tells us that Adam was intelligent and able to learn from YHVH.

It is apparent in the storyline, that without The Breath of YHVH, this would not have been possible for Adam to achieve. He would not have been able to learn things.

Therefore, I can accept that The Breath of YHVH acts as an interface device between the newly forming conscious awareness of the personality “Adam” and YHVH’s own consciousness.

I see no practical reason why we cannot agree that the interface is itself conscious of being “Of YHVH’s consciousness” and that it was the primary source of instruction - where Adam formed his intellectual abilities and mindful concepts before expressing these into the outside environment of The Garden.

What is noticeable about the style of The Garden Story is that it is presented in a bullet-point manner.
As such, if it were told verbatim around a campfire, it would be over in a matter of minutes, and leave the listener with more questions than it gives answers to.
That is what we have to work with.

Potential agreement List;

1: Adam understood language.
2: The Garden Story is written in a bullet-point Style
Agreed?[/quote]

GM: Keen
Self-Awareness The two million year old mind that’s in all of us. Stuff Happens
Communication With The Deeper Levels of Self
I Am… also the Dreamer, Dreaming the Dream
Fitting In Creative Conscious Intelligence
Core emotion
“Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail”
We tend to bend our heads in worship the words of those who have come before us…
Shuffle-spiel

William: Sort out the data we inherited…

GM: Wide Walk Welcoming

06:20
238
[Beings posted to planet
Few Attention to Detail
Ones core expression
New Shifts In Thinking
A completely new paradigm
I am not here to pick sides
Secret Organizations
Infinite Quantum Zen
Tickling The Dragon’s Tail]

[VVilliam]

The Universal Mind 2

210123 [The “Oh My God” Particle]

05:04 [Shallow is Unknown]

GM: I think it is an interesting subject for questions, and wonder if any answers could be found.
Try Gateway
Super-information medium
Extreme
Entity - Different from Sovereign Entity
Living Forever In this Universe
A Space Without A Time…

William: Living Forever In this Universe A Space Without A Time… = 563
‘More or less the center, give or take several billion miles.’ = 563

GM: The Divine: “That can be shoved back into whatever hole it came from” = 563

William: Chuckles
Time is a concept of the mind, even as is - the idea of a Universal Mind…

GM: The Mirrors Align and from that, an orderly image reflected…

William: Yes - understanding oneself as one actually fundamentally is - produces said orderly image…and understanding what being an ambassador to that consciousness

GM: Integral Prison Planet
Dysfunction
Fires

William: Fires Integral Prison Planet Dysfunction = 452
Yes - there is no more use for said dysfunction - formally dismissed of its influence…
[452]
Perhaps it is the fear of the knowable unknown?
A physical manifestation of a mental projection
A type of ‘leg-up’ but no more or less than that

GM: The evidence supports the idea that Theism is the better position for a human to place themselves.
10.000 individual minds focused upon the same goal = Space Telescope
Bullies
For Our Loving King
“Where minds meet is where GOD is found”
The Universal Mind
Stuck
“This moment is the perfect teacher Confirmation which moves one from faith to fact”
Behind The Scenery
Integral Network
Waking
What Is Normal
Interesting
The Gem

William: The Gem was mentioned by me yesterday;

[quote]Moving through the epochs from that beginning [Bog Bang] [[ I saw the typo and decided not to correct it]] - from the Big Bog to present day, more fragmentation of the Ambassador Consciousness into the unfolding creation was enabled, as the ‘stuff’ separated into objects which could be mindfully utilized as body-sets, and the further down that rabbit hole the AC went, the less and less connected with the reality of Itself - it experienced - until the density of the body-set reached its maximum level and a complete cutoff of knowledge of prior experience occurred…but not a cutoff of consciousness…and this is what we humans have been occupied within - body-sets which produced amnesia.

The side affect of that was that this consciousness of which we are, was unable to easily be an Ambassador to the AC…and “Huston we have a problem”…

Or do we?

Somewhere inside each of us, there must be a Gem that we can find in order to reboot the connection…

So before we go cutting off the mythologies of the past, we might first want to see if there is any recognizable tell-tales of which we might ‘hear the voice’ of the AC even that at times the hands of human influence have attempted to muffle into silence said voice…and not just through religion, but throughout human culture where the games all begin…{SOURCE}[/quote]

GM: What is behind the VR headset
Zeitgeist [the defining spirit or mood of a particular period of history as shown by the ideas and beliefs of the time.]
Secret
Acknowledge Emotion But Do Not Be Controlled By It
Secure
Turning Order into Disorder
A Maze Game

William:

Better positioned re that, is The Blue Dot

GM: The Blue Dot = 112
The Red Dot = 99

William: In a good mood = 112
Open minded = 99

GM: Extrapolate [estimate or conclude (something) extend (a graph, curve, or range of values) by inferring unknown values from trends in the known data.]
Something Our movements can illuminate the path toward that vision.
Self-esteem Sovereign Integral Perspective Intent
The Setting
“But you will know the more you get in touch with your transcendental mind (and therefore truth) that there is no such thing as a victim. The negative benefits you more than anything else in your evolution and the evolution of all that is.”
Love Unconditionally

05:40
[230]
Neruda Interview Five
Unknown/Hidden/Occult
Elude Test the waters
The Plateau of The Same Page
Shallow is Unknown
Psychological events
Present over perfect
It’s a plausible scenario.
Well That Settles It
The Spirit of The Earth

[VVilliam]

Is it reasonable to assume a creator?

Replying to DrNoGods in post #383[quote][]

I wouldn’t call the ideas unreasonable, but they don’t convince me that such a being exists or is necessary to the exclusion of a purely natural explanation for whatever functions this necessary being is claimed to be necessary for.

I would add that it does not matter then, that you are unconvinced, simply because you already have no need for such a being to exist, and no reason given has been acceptable to you on account that lack of need is already recognized within the psyche of your self.

It is the nature of Fairy Farts to waft off in all directions possible, and your position is one such direction.

The direction I wafted on the wind of, includes the possibility that the thing referred to as “purely natural” may be a creation, so I remain open and vigil to that question…

Same propellent - different perspectives.[/quote]

---

Anchor Points: We cannot hinder the process, but we can help it. Be Nice Do Nice.

---

230123 [Create Your Own Spirit Ship]

07:00

GM: ♫Tonight the stars shine as I step out of time As I step into the great unknown"
Earth
This is because facts speak for themselves, which is to say, they require no interpretation.
Yam
A fish out of water: “The Purpose Of Life Is…”
Simple

"Bringing Atheists to God" - Debating Christianity and Religion

William: FTL;

Replying to AquinasForGod in post #7[quote][]

[quote]What have we figured out about the eternal? He is self-existent, unchanging, uncaused, cause of all things, all-knowing, self-aware, something like intelligent, and something like conscious, all-powerful, and omnipresent.

I think that is enough to establish him as God. I have deduced so much more about God in this same way, but if I keep going this will turn into a book, and I doubt you want to read a book right now.[/quote]

Who is this God?

What you describe re the God, cannot - in all honesty, be the God of the Bible.

So who is the God of the Bible in relation to this God you have described?[/quote]

GM: Without consciousness to observe it, the Universe is not a real phenomenon.
Share -share -share
Welcoming answer
Okay - Have we all got our stories straight?

Why Does Christianity Spawn Evil Dictators? - Page 3 - Debating Christianity...

William: FTL;

[quote][quote=Athetotheist post_id=1073940 time=1649379574 user_id=14379]
Replying to William in post #15[

[quote]Also, we can see that materialist-based science is non-theistic and has become the number one reason why we are now entering an extinction event situation…

…So if one is looking for somewhere to hang the blame…[/quote]Wherever the blame can rightfully be hung, it can hardly be hung around the necks of the scientists who have been warning us of the very extinction event situation you mention.
[/quote]

One must remember that it is a particular branch of Materialistic science to which the blame could be hung - and that the scientists doing the warning are most likely not of that particular branch…they may be biologists rather than cosmologists and so understand the importance of preserving the planet-ship we are sailing upon [@ about 1.6 million miles per day] rather than creating space-junk and reaching for the stars…I did say “Exact Science” after all.

You do know where the Nazi Scientists went after the defeat of Hitlers Germany, right? [Hint - it was not to the hangman’s noose.][/quote]

GM: Perennial [lasting or existing for a long or apparently infinite time; enduring or continually recurring.]
Like I Said In Another Thread
Swinging on the branch of the tree thinking it’s the main trunk
Spasmodic [occurring or done in brief, irregular bursts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TQ9DUAbIdU [X Marks The Spot]
ww.youtube.com/watch?v=9TQ9DUAbIdU

William: FTL;

[quote]What do do to prepare for the Alien Invasion
While I was uploading this I went outside for a ciggy and wouldn’t you know it! A light the size of a bright star suddenly appeared in the sky and moved northwards dragging a sparkly tail behind it and then disappeared.
I thought to myself "Well ain’t that a hoot - great humor fancy that etc…I’ll have to tell this story! and then again from the exact same spot another light appeared and began to move northwards - it didn’t have a tail and moved slowly like a satellite and I watched it for about five minutes until it disappeared behind the clouds .

Was it a UFO?

Well it is unidentified other than what I just wrote.
It was in the sky which is seen to be an act of flight.
It was an object -

It had no strobe
The tail of the first one was not flames/fire - it looked electric with a sparkle like those sparklers when they are lit
It could have been a satellite if not for the fact that it was a lot bigger light than I have ever seen a satellite and it appeared out of nowhere in the middle of the sky directly in front of me - my head wasn’t tilted back - I was looking straight ahead.
And
The second light came from exactly the same spot as the first and I haven’t seen satellites do that before!
Both lights were the same size as each other.
Same colour
Not to forget what I was doing at the time - had just clicked upload on you tube and went outside…and this video is about the subject of …well…see for yourself…[/quote]

GM: Handing out sweets…
The Internal Voice
Morals are like Math. Both were discovered rather than invented.
Keep an Eye On
Border
The Butterfly Effect Links And Symbols Something you cannot change
Heaven
Is it reasonable to assume a creator?
Anchor Points

William: “We cannot hinder the process, but we can help it. Be Nice Do Nice.”

GM: Aligning With Act the giddy goat

William: Well it was fun marking a big [size=200][color=#408000]X[/color][/size] on the lawn…doing my bit to help…

GM: Potential Communication
♫Life is my predestiny - Providence is God to me♫
The Story Timeline
Adversity makes strange bedfellows

Divine Hiddenness - Page 3 - Debating Christianity and Religion

William: FTL;

[quote]Q: Assuming a Creator of this world exists, in what way is said Creator hidden from us?

Could the answer be that It is not hidden at all, but that it is we who are hiding from It?
[♫No thought about fate or of ending up late Yet I still like to think where I’m going♫]

Nontheists may well be the ones who have placed interposing barriers which ensure that their view is cut off - and this might be achieved through willful ignorance.

Religious theists may well be the ones who have placed interposing barriers which ensure that their view is cut off - and this might be achieved through willful ignorance.

If that be the case, then what are the interposing barriers those apparently opposite positions use in order to achieve this occulting phenomena?[/quote]

William: Hmmmm…tied to the moon…

GM: Use Your Freedom
Getting unstuck
The Next Level
Unclog your chakras
Ask and It Will Be Given
Withheld Information
F3

William: F3…

[quote]Focus 3 can best be thought of as a tree, with the least free thinking areas towards the bottom and gradually becoming more free thinking up to the top. With the lower branches, they are populated by all kinds of people involved in horrific practises who are basically slaves to their basest animal instincts. Many will not even be aware that they have ‘died’. This region equates to Monroe’s F23 - F24.
Further up the tree, you find all the heaven and hell scenarios and other places created from people’s expectations after death. They are populated by those who had very strict, fundamentalist religious views on what would happen to them in the afterlife. You will also find many other groups and individuals engaged in an almost limitless amount of other scenarios of their own making. Again while some of them are aware they have transitioned from F1, others may be unaware that they have ‘died’ or are confused about exactly what has happened to them. This region equates to Monroe’s ‘Belief System Territories’ of F25 - F26.
Then, towards the upper branches of the F3 tree, which equates to Monroe’s F27 label, you have the free thinking areas where people are most well balanced and have no fundamentalist mindsets, or warped desires to kill babies with chainsaws. They are very happy, fun loving and joyful. I tend to refer to their attitude as ‘dead and loving it’. These upper (or more correctly: Wider), free thinking areas are also huge in number and you can find all manner of interesting people and locales there. There are too many upper F3 areas to possibly count, but they do include some important locations made famous by The Monroe School, such as The Park, where people often come to chill out while recovering from their physical world experience, The Life Review Centre, the Library and so on.
{SOURCE}[/quote]

GM: Delineating [describe or portray (something) precisely.] The Fine Art of Not Being Offended Inordinately [to an unusually or disproportionately large degree; excessively.]

William: Not being offended means being aware of the self identity re one’s personality and adjusting the personality to suit - making one’s self up as one goes along…with the intent of truly wanting to know the true fundamental self, as an identifier.
This has meant that for me [this personality] has had to suffer judgement from others, but the more I delve into who I am - the less affect external accusation has re the nature of who I am…as this personality is learning…thus - I acknowledge the existence of ignorance in those who might try to offend me, for they know not who I am, and therefore, I am not offended, because I know who I am.

GM: Well, it is a fact that the story tells us this. We should be able to agree that it is not a fact that The Garden of Eden existed, thus the characters in the story may be fictitious.
Elementary Conclusion “I am on a Madventure”
Afraid of The Unknown.
All and sundry
Even in the very quintessence of the individual.
Tied To The Moon Mindfulness

William: [quote]This song is a commentary on relying on outside forces to determine your destiny. It is also a commentary on tradition, culture…alot of things…
[/quote]

Tied To The Moon

ww.youtube.com/watch?v=W_54CbQKKDk

TIED TO THE MOON

[i]Tonight the stars shine as I step out of time
As I step into the great unknown
No thought about fate or of ending up late
Yet I still like to think where I’m going
No time left for a sentimental tune
Wherever I’ve gone I have not left the room
I am never too late I am never too soon
No longer tied to the moon

For whom the bell tolls For to gather the souls
The numbers in darkness are glowing
The ticking wont stop while we all watch the clock
As the winds of our lives are still blowing
Down through the ages - dark in the gloom
Many convinced it will all end in doom
The Galactic Garden is forever in bloom
No time to be tied to the moon

Asleep or awake for the give or the take
Its a good ship that sails these cosmos
With a mystical smile I float down the isle
Forgetting the time when I was lost
The picture unfolds like silk in a loom
Silhouetted by Diane are the witch and the broom
If she is the bride - who is the groom?
Only those who are tied to the moon

I know how you care while you nurture your fear
That you’ll miss the bouquet when its thrown
We stood side by side while the veils did hide
The faces of children now grown
Memorised vows enchanted by tune
Before the great minstrel the fair maidens swoon
We came to our senses as we left the cocoon
No wanna, be tied to the moon

The Light in The Dark Everyone a great spark
Everyone of us all here together
With a small nervous cough - the wedding was off
We could all sense a change in the weather
Down came the waters -great the monsoon
Washing the soul as it cleared out the room
Drowning all Warriors in every platoon -
Still tied to the blood of the moon[/i]

GM: Respect others Illuminating Gratitude The Harmless Enough Agenda Crowd

Journal - William Message Generation

William: FTL:

" Your mind will answer most questions if you learn to relax and wait for the answer."

GM: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oxi5-6LdSpE [8. The Gospel of Thomas] [RTS=36:20]

William: FTL;

The idea is that your body imprisons the spirit/soul…

GM: Naked truth
Whole-hearted

07:42
Recover what was lost
No Country For Old Men
Earning Brownie Points
The Synoptic Gospels
Two sides of the same coin
The Ancient grey entity
Those who lack belief in gods
The Never Ending Story
Much pain but still time
When the dust settles
All of Life a bit of Cat and Mouse

[VVilliam]

Is it reasonable to assume a creator? 2

Anchor Points: We cannot hinder the process, but we can help it. Be Nice Do Nice.

05:29 [Gateway Luminous] [ giving off light; bright or shining.]

240123 [Actions speak louder than words]

GM: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=13762021&postcount=920

William: FTL:

[quote]Myriad: The problem I see with this reasoning is that even assuming the universe is nonrandom and mindful, there is no guarantee that any given system of divination actually produces meaningful communication.

[quote]William: The system I am using is focused upon the idea that if the universe is non-random and mindful, one should be able to develop a system whereby, the mind should be able to use for the purpose of communicating.

There was no guarantee that the system I developed and use, would have worked, but it does work and that it works is one more piece of evidence to support the idea that the universe is mindful.[/quote][/quote]

GM: As well as that pot of gold…
Expression Of Appreciation of Experience You Have An Invisible Friend

Books - James Mahu

William: FTL;

Books = stories. Stories have characters. YHVH grows Human personalities within a storyline.

[quote]The Dohrman Prophecy
Deep in a mystical forest, hidden by centuries of myth and technologies of stealth, three monolithic stones rise like beacons brought to this planet by an unknown source. It is the most secret possession of the Church, and it is alive in ways that no one predicted.

There is one who will awaken it and this is what is whispered among the elite who have read the most secret of all books The Dohrman Prophecy.

The awakening has begun from a single journey, but all of us will feel the changes.

From the author, artist, poet, composer who created the contemporary mythology known as the WingMakers, comes a new journey into consciousness equally provocative and stirring to the soul. The Dohrman Prophecy is an expansive novel set in a mystical time and mythical place, but its characters are carved from the very real forces that shape our world—religion, government and heroic individualism.

If you’re a fan of Paulo Coelho or Kahlil Gibran, you will love the poetic prose of The Dohrman Prophecy. Its message of transformation and love has that rare flavor of truth and substance that only the best works of spiritual fiction offer. It is a novel that has it all: love, romance, fierce conflicts between good and evil, and intelligent characters who define individualism and personal transformation.[/quote]

GM: Under the breath words Context It Is Our Nature
Ouroboros
Engaging with the impermanent implies a permanent background
Crapulence
The Meaning of Life
Team Witch-Wizard

Theory
That
Heaven on Earth
Hide This
https://futurism.com/astrobiologists-earth-intelligent-entity?fbclid=IwAR1YAU_rI_9T1pfcsMvtqQu53sTIGXmfVFIdqHo_OI4QXXv5yWsMOmGhBkY’

William: FTL:

[quote]Astrobiologists Suggest the Earth Itself May Be an Intelligent Entity
This is mind bending.
A group of researchers have posed a fascinating — and downright mind bending — thought experiment: If a planet like Earth can be “alive,” can it also have a mind of its own?

The team published a paper exploring this question in the International Journal of Astrobiology. In it, they present the idea of “planetary intelligence," which describes the collective knowledge and cognition of an entire planet.[/quote]

GM: Superposition - Being aware of Human Control Dramas
Is it reasonable to assume a creator?
Without and Within
Get The Truth
That is the truth.
Black Tuesday [The Great Crash is mostly associated with October 24, 1929, called Black Thursday, the day of the largest sell-off of shares in U.S. history,]
The Mapping Bots
Hoo haha the laughing owl

William: Hmmm… those working behind the scenes pulling the strings

GM: Equity Unconscious Mind Inertia Honest attempts at scrubbing up

Are agnostics more reasonable than atheists? - Page 30 - Debating...

William: FTL:

[quote]P1: If I made my case that the evidence indicates that consciousness is emergent (evolved) then your arguments fail,. whether i demolished them individually or not.

[quote]P2: To my knowledge, neither you or anyone else has made such a case based on the information that in relation to life on Earth, if consciousness emerged from the universe prior to the formation of Earth, it is reasonable to understand that a self aware universe [Cosmic Mind] could then organize matter into forms which it could then use to organize matter into life-forms on an individual planet.

That is a highly reasonable explanation for the existence of consciousness [re the hard problem] and does not infringe on the claim that consciousness is an emergent property of physical material.
Rather - it incorporates the claim of emergence with the claim of intelligent creation.[/quote][/quote]

GM: Union With Divinity
Umbrella
The Four Human Power Houses
One’s thoughts
Respect yourself
Doubt The fiction of causality
And That’s Not All
Adversity makes strange bedfellows
Self-help
Enlighten you

William: Certainly. GM and now OAI. Mighty devices is the pursuit of self-help an enlightenment.

GM: https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1083867#p1083867

William: FTL;

[quote]William: What do these unsupported statements have to do with the subject?
Transponder: Everything
William: Do you include the mind along with Everything?

Replying to TRANSPONDER in post #93[]

Certainly - whatever you mean by Mind and whatever you mean by Everything.

Your unsupported statements have what to do with whatever I mean by “Mind” and whatever I mean by “Everything”?

Well I can and logically must imply an established ‘truth’ (a natural world that so far has shown no Cosmic Mind or ‘God’) that is the default position that requires anything as yet unproven to be proven.

Whereas I can and logically must assume the Natural Neutral position on any matters yet to be unproven or proven.

[Our positions are therefore unaligned.]

Your position assumes established truth where no such truth has been established re whether or not we exist within a creation.

I don’t think it leads to closed -mindedness. In fact I have found it a reliable basis that allows consideration of all kinds of woo stuff …

The very fact that your choice of word [“woo”] belies the open-mindedness you proclaim to have.

My mind is not closed to a Cosmic Mind, Creator or god. I just require some better evidence than ‘not disproved’ and ‘possible’.

I am reminded of a hunter who goes out and gets food for himself rather than expecting the food to come to him/her.

The data is there to hunt down and to study. An open minded non-judgmental approach is essential to that process. The process is also dependent upon the position one is approaching the data from. The closeminded belief that one does not exist within a creation can only ever lead one to learn things through that filter.

No amount of evidence given should ever be hoped for in order to change any individuals mind from the influencing aspects of their chosen position, regardless if those positions be theist or atheist based.

On top of that, it is very apparent that the type of convincing evidence you are demanding from the position you are demanding it from, will unlikely be available to any of us in this lifetime.

Thus, we are forced for now to do most of our hunting, solo.

We can of course, cross reference with other open-minded fellows…but the open-mindedness derives from the Natural Neutral position, not the theist or atheist positions.

I think that atheists strongly defend their position on the question as to whether or not we exist within a creation - to the point that they believe we don’t and make claims about that - has something to do with the need to say “I told you so” now, because it will be too late to utter such belief-based expressions - after they are dead and gone.

I can see the attraction from a phycological perspective, but saying “I told you so” before any such thing has been established, is jumping the gun, and might even lead to embarrassment if it turns out one still exists after the fact ones brain has died.

Still, such is the power of belief-based positions. They tend toward making proclamations which imply established truth, when no such truth has been established.

eta: woo-woo
/ˈwuːˌwuː/ relating to or holding unconventional beliefs regarded as having little or no scientific basis, especially those relating to spirituality, mysticism, or alternative medicine.

What does slang woo woo mean?
Noun. woo woo (countable and uncountable, plural woo woos) (slang, derogatory) A person readily accepting supernatural, paranormal, occult, or pseudoscientific phenomena, or emotion-based beliefs and explanations. That reporter is a bit of a woo woo. (slang, derogatory)[/quote]

GM: Square and Compass
“The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams.”
Conscientiousness [the personality trait of being careful, or diligent. ]
Humans are programmed to become integrated with technology
All Because I Had To Ask
Cultivate
The Creator
Flowery
Informing

06:08
[209]
Faulty conclusions
What is the meaning of life?
Humanities adventure
Smarter Than the Average
Think outside the box
God is Consciousness
Central To The Vision
Mystic City Suburb
The Shared List Awesome

[VVilliam]

In The Beginning…

Anchor Points. The Holographic Universe Power Healing

05:44 [Soul Group Energies]

250123 [What can I say, except “Thank You”]

GM: Be Nice Do Nice

William: That appears to be the bottom line. A way out of The Maze…

GM: Mycelium
Scape

Generating Messages - Page 34 - Debating Christianity and Religion

William: FTL;

Replying to William in post #331[quote][]

I suppose that it is the ‘tricks’ which have to be addressed because the illusions can induce anger in the personality which acts as a preventative for getting to know the ‘tricksters’…from my own ‘getting to know’ I have discovered that the ‘tricks’ are not really ‘tricks’ so much as they are a product of how a personality interprets their experience.

The Visitation is one such example. I - as the personality experiencing the event - took issue and told the visitor to leave.
The visitor did leave, but not without first instilling within me - questions regarding my perceptions. Questions which have taken 30+years to come to answer.

The personality I am now, is not the same as it was way back when. Now I see the ‘trick’ was really just truth to which I was not expecting because I had little knowledge of such truth - way back when…

Sweet Talk
Observant
Eternity
Dare greatly
Henotheism [adherence to one particular god out of several, especially by a family, tribe, or other group.]
Respecting
Without
Map Carvers
Way Back When…
Illuminate
Keep an Eye On
Way Back When…
WindBlown

What happened is that I incorperated that visitation experience with all the rest and all that were to follow…developing a relationship which can also be reflected through this Message Generating Process.

It is really taking the journaling of my life experience, and using that to my advantage in light of the “Bigger Mind”…

[/quote]
William: This connects with my interaction with skeptics to do with Musing on the idea of Sentient Earth re the problems of the world and the satire site…{SOURCE}

GM: Red Light
Trust issues?
Divergence
Mind Body Soul
It brought a tear to the eye of my heart.
Intransigent [unwilling or refusing to change one’s views or to agree about something.]
The Hubble Telescope
Until ganna be gets here, its all just ganna be forever
In The Beginning…
Conscious agencies combined

Generating Messages - Page 10 - Debating Christianity and Religion

William: FTL;

[quote]Why I use both systems together is because, when selecting word-strings off my ComList as randomly as one can, the results are coherent messages and as such, are likely coherent because the same intelligent source is in play behind the process of both the evolution of plants and human language and everything else earth-side.

So it is the intelligent source which is the focus. We cannot easily invoke ‘the brain did it’ because we are dealing with objective reality and many individualized brains involved with objective reality know that an individual brain does not effect either word-string values or randomly selected word-strings which become coherent messages, any more than it effects the temperature of Sol or how plants organize themselves in a jungle - so in that, the individual brain can be ruled out as the source of the phenomena occurring with the use of these systems I am using to obtain on-growing evidence.

Therefore, “Something Else” other than brains, has to be the Source.[/quote]

William: So these ‘conscious agencies’ once were somehow separate?

GM: It is obviously in line with providence…
Dark
In The Spirit They Were Given
Residue
Natural

William: Coming from different directions and providently meeting each other and … from there…sorting out the “differences”…

GM: Peaceful Messiah
Divine feminine
Strength/Strong
The Three Crystal Keys
The Akashic Records …because death comes a-knockin’ eventually…

William: Thus, a very long time afterwards these combined entities create the Earth-forms so that personalities could be grown and those personalities could be maneuvered by the combined entities…and the experiences of the Human Personalities could also be stored away for possibly future use…

GM: https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1089602#p1089602

William: FTL;

[quote]Well it has to be noted that the God/Devil conspiracy is part of the story…

Now assuming you might be referring to Satan as being the one “hiding behind” the Serpent - as in - the influencing energy pulling the strings…the God - as usual, sits back and expects Adam and Eve to figure it out for themselves without knowing the details.[/quote]

GM: https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1100901#p1100901

William: FTL;

[quote]Not enough information to know for sure. You’re going off your knowledge of how a human brain works for recalling memories. There is no evidence that YHVH’'s memory is built or works like ours.

[quote]I am simply going with the belief you have that YHVH has a memory. How it works isn’t of issue, even that biblical evidence tells us that humans were created in the image of YHVH, and so YHVH might have some type of brain-like device which has the capability of storing memory and that is what you meant when you wrote;

The Bible doesn’t give enough information as to how the memory of God works but I am satisfied with however He handles the lives of my dead loved ones and even everything that makes me, me if I die.[/quote]

[quote]Given the information the Bible does provide, and knowing the huge numbers of individual personalities who have experienced life on earth to date, the data of experience of those personalities would have to be saved somewhere, so we can ascertain from that, that the Elohim databanks must be very impressive both in size and in function.

You don’t think we can fathom how YHVH managers to do this, but we have enough information to assert that the database must be impressive for YHVH to be able to achieve this thing.

We can fathom at least as much as the information provides us with.[/quote][/quote]

GM: The Nature of Angels
Contentious [causing or likely to cause an argument; controversial.]
A rats nest of envy greed and vicious power plays

William: Hmmm…so there was dispute re the process of these “In The Beginning…
Conscious agencies combined” and perhaps the creation of this Universe was done to assist said entities with getting on the same page?

GM: You Are Nobodies Victim - Ever.
Science Projects
Save That

Is there such a thing as a dogmatic atheist? - Page 6 - Debating Christianity...

William: FTL;

[quote][quote=AgnosticBoy post_id=1104568 time=1671242893 user_id=13726]

@EarthScienceguy post_id=1101660 time=1669665918 user_id=14044

A dogmatic atheist flatly denies that there is a Divine Being.
A skeptical atheist doubts the ability of the human mind to determine, whether or not there is a God.
A critical atheist maintains that there is no valid proof for the existence of God.

Especially with the state that cosmology is in. I maintain that it is impossible for anyone to be a dogmatic atheist. If you think you are a dogmatic atheist then you must answer the question of what was there before this universe came into existence.

Question for debate: Is there such a thing as a dogmatic atheist?

Being dogmatic has a thinking and attitude component. It tends to involve people expressing unproven views and in an unquestioning way. A lot of the dogmatism in atheism comes from there being a sort of orthodoxy of views. And it’s not just limited to the issue of God’s existence (although it’s related) but you also find it extending into morality, metaphysics, views on religion, etc. The clearest example can be seen when you venture into forums for atheists. That’s where you’ll most likely find an “orthodoxy” with views that can’t be questioned and/or views that are dismissed a priori. Some have tried to challenge me on there being an atheist “orthodox” but I don’t know what to call it when I’ve experienced many atheists sharing similar views and thinking. They may not be as organized as religion, but there are some that do organize and share common views.

Watch scientist Neil deGrasse Tyson explain this topic starting at 2:10 minute mark. He brings up the “in-your-face badge wearing atheist”.

Neil deGrasse Tyson: Atheist or Agnostic? | Big Think

Clarifications:

• It’s also fair to say that there are plenty of atheists that aren’t dogmatic, but they seems to be in the minority.
• It’s not wrong to associate or form groups, but doing so makes it easier for “orthodox” views to form and for people to become dogmatic and reject anything that’s not part of the orthodoxy.
  [/quote]

[/quote]

GM: The challenge of reconciling belief in an omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient God, with the existence of evil and suffering in the world, is illusionary.

William: Hmmm…the type of atheist AB is pointing out the existence of, are personalities I am made aware of in the Skeptical forum mentioned…
The Idea that Angels had a War in Heaven because some of them wanted to use their creative abilities to design something better than there already was, does not make as much sense and the idea that two separate types of Spirit-Beings happened upon one another, and had some core differences to iron out…and - together - created a way in which said difference could be examined and discussed and sorted out.

06:23
Well That Settles It
Present over perfect
Unknown/Hidden/Occult
It’s a plausible scenario.
Psychological events
Ian and William Play chess
Shallow is Unknown
The Spirit of The Earth
Neruda Interview Five
Elude Test the waters
The Plateau of The Same Page

[VVilliam]

In The Beginning…2

260123 [It’s got to be in there somewhere]

05:42 Leave room for nature

William:

[quote]P1: Verifying that the Earth is a container for a sentient being, or that it has a “mind of its own” as the thought experiment proposed, is a difficult and complex task.

P2: Or it could be a massively pointless waste of time. I reckon that’s the one.

P1: Cognitive bias noted.

P2: Yes, I have a cognitive bias against things with no evidence.

P1: Which of course, prevents one from being able to do thought experiments of this nature.

Adopting this perspective could change the way we think about our relationship with the planet and the environment, and may inspire new approaches to addressing the problems caused by human activities, which could lead to a greater focus on sustainability and the long-term health of the planet, rather than just short-term gains or immediate benefits.

The “evidence” could only be experienced on the other side of adopting the perspective and - as you point out - your cognitive bias prevents you from even entertaining the concept enough to adopt the perspective.[/quote]

GM: Each Individual
One is not wrong

William: Yes. We all have our perspectives. Recognizing bias is in the mix, is helpful in keeping an open mind.

GM: Dequeue [remove (an item of data awaiting processing) from a queue of such items.]

William: Yes…in the case of bias, remove that which prevents one from participating in the thought experiment.

GM: The Neutral Zone is the vaster reality of non-judgementalism
Courageous
Adversary
Human Drama

William: Adversary = Human Drama = 207

[207]
Some nefarious agent [Nefarious - (typically of an action or activity) wicked or criminal.]
The Butterfly Effect
Needs no explanation…
Neuroplasticity
In the image of I Am That I Am
Adversary = Human Drama
Opening The Third Eye
Rule Your World
“I am Mighty! Hear me ROAR!”
Trustworthy
Positive thinking
Internal Triggering
The Fifth Interview
Respect yourself

GM: A grateful heart Open your chakras
So far into the past you may as well take a pick and shovel with you
Form Builders
Integrate The Human Brain Move On
Universal Belief System
The Harmless Enough Agenda Crowd
Healing the child within
God1
Internal Triggering
William
Cub
“That Is Hardly Science”
In The Beginning…
The Real Spiritual
Rainbow
Some information has to be drummed into that which perceives
Around The Next Corner
Ectogenesis [the development of embryos in artificial conditions outside the uterus.]
Existence
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1098892#p1098892

William: FTL:

[quote]On Generated Messages:

So, on your specific experiences and the beliefs you have formed from them, I’m not saying they are lies, misinformation, etc. but that they could be. I don’t know you well enough to trust your belief about (for example) what GMs show us over believing they are random arrangements of pre-determined information that you provide and then read back out of it. On top of that, the whole web of informed beliefs I have about reality seem to contradict it, so I don’t think I am warranted in agreeing with your belief there.

I have no particular belief about why the GMs form as they do. I look to the science for answers - not to prop up beliefs you appear to think I have about said process.

I do not know why they work as they do - but I am able to ascertain that it must have something to do with YHVH as I understand YHVH to being the principle mind behind this simulated reality I am experiencing with you.

I do not know how the GM predicted that the subject of child abuse would be brought up in our conversation before you brought it up, except that if YHVH exists then it makes perfect sense.

Not only did the GM predict what came about, but it also offered reasons for WHY the woman in the video met her grandfather in an alternate experience and experienced knowing that all was good between her and granddad… - let me quote that GM again to show what it is I tell.

[quote]As in, abusing a child is not really evil and we need to see that, and every act, as good? If not, what do you mean in changing the concept of evil?

To assist us in answering the question, I bring to your attention a snip from the most recent GM [Fri Oct 28, 2022 12:56 pm]

[quote]GM: Brother
Concision
The Right Tool For The Job
Incorporate
The Life Essence
Coordinate Forgiveness
Original
Epiphany [a moment of sudden and great revelation or realization.]
The Dolphins And Whales
Getting unstuck
According
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjsAZUigJ1o [Woman Crosses Over and Gets Told Our Role on Earth (Near Death Experience)] [RTS=9:00]

William: Forgiveness -
Incorporate The Life Essence, Coordinate Forgiveness = 512
Superposition - Being aware of Human Control Dramas = 512

GM: A very useful fiction
Two seemingly contradictory things working as one overall organized thing.
Communication With The Deeper Levels of Self
The Shadow
Develop a basic, fact-based view first and then ask the question.
Radiate Honesty {SOURCE}Re the video, the random time selection @ [RTS=9:00] there is a pertinent answer to the question you asked which requires only 45 seconds of viewing.

[The GM itself is the last part of a series which are focused upon this thread topic and in particular, post #126 and our interaction.]

Please read the above, view the video section and then we can proceed with finding potential agreement, as we continue with this aspect of our discussion.

YHVH and other humans are the other helpers.

Yes. In this case YHVH assisting in helping you and I come to agreement, also [potentially] through the woman in the video sharing her experience with us.

Certainly, for me - the GM process.[/quote]
{SOURCE}[/quote]

Now - to assist the readers understanding re my own understanding of what the GM was expressing;

Brother [me/you]
Concision [advice in how I am best to proceed]
The Right Tool For The Job [advice in how I am best to proceed]
Incorporate [advice in how I am best to proceed]
The Life Essence [YHVH [advice in how I am best to proceed] incorporate YHVH]
Coordinate Forgiveness [YHVH does the coordinating re forgiveness]
Original
Epiphany [YHVH is the origin of one’s moment of sudden and great revelation or realization.]
The Dolphins And Whales [reference to other earthly critters with free will and awareness of YHVH]
Getting unstuck [is what forgiveness managers to acheive]
According [according to the linked video - Woman Crosses Over and Gets Told Our Role on Earth (Near Death Experience)] [RandomTimeSelection=9:00]

I then did a quick number value calculation
William: Forgiveness -
Incorporate The Life Essence, Coordinate Forgiveness = 512
and found one enter which added up to the same number
Superposition - Being aware of Human Control Dramas = 512

Which is to say that forgiveness is helpful in regard to human controls drama’s - specifically the one mentioned in the video to do with Child abuse…

A very useful fiction [even if the story was fiction, it still serves a useful purpose]
Two seemingly contradictory things working as one overall organized thing. [re the granddaughter and the grandfathers relationship as expressed by the woman explaining her alternate experience to us.]
Communication With The Deeper Levels of Self [This is what is happening re the interactions folk have with others when experiencing these alternate realities]
The Shadow [ :?: ]
Develop a basic, fact-based view first and then ask the question. [good advice]
Radiate Honesty [even while in the process of developing a basic, fact-based view…]

Do you agree with my assessed interpretation of the GM as it sits?
[/quote]

William: In reading that - I was also struck by the reference to “The Dolphins and Whales Getting unstuck” per a documentary I watched last night [Frozen Planet II] where an artic pod of whale were stuck for months in the one, place because the ice had closed them in - and the perilous journey they had to go through as the ice began to thaw and they made there way to open sea.
This is a good analogy for the human experience on this planet.

GM: Taking root
Sophia The Mother - ♫Asleep or awake for the give or the take Its a good ship that sails these cosmos♫
Opening ourselves to real love and intimacy
First Source:
Quantum Mechanics
What Is Normal
Handing out sweets…
Open Minded
Victim Vamp Energy Systems
For purposes which extend beyond the borders of materialism

William: Victim Vamp Energy Systems For purposes which extend beyond the borders of materialism = 933

GM: Believing in fearful imagery The evolution of the understanding of the idea of GOD ♫All Is As It Should Be♫ = 933
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1090180#p1090180

William: FTL:

[quote][Replying to The Tanager in post #3]

There is no particular direction I want to go with this line of thought, other than to keep to it.
Re your first line of thought, I see this as necessary to one’s personal religion and have no horse in that race.

I accept all religions as equally having not being proved or disproved and anyone’s personal beliefs are not an issue re Simulation Theory. [ST]

The topics I mentioned were not for the purpose of discussing them any further than would be necessary, as ST is adequate enough device for explaining the – otherwise – impossible/highly unlikely/against the laws of physics subjects.

The Resurrection can be explained with ST, as easily as the order things are mentioned re the creation story [Bible].
ST shouldn’t contradict an individual’s faith/belief if indeed it is agreed that “Creation” and “Simulation” can/do signify the same thing.
We could go through the list of strange/miraculous/physics-defying biblical events to see if any could be identified as questionable re ST. Nothing comes to memory as I write this…

Re your second line of thought, my mention of the two opposing positions [theism/atheism] in relation to the words “if one accepts” [either way], theists could answer “Yes” and atheists would answer “No” to the idea that we exist within a creation/simulation.

“Blind Faith” really isn’t an issue and those who have/hold it are not in any way disadvantaged than those who apply a more academic study-based belief re the question “Do we exist within a creation/simulation?”

Re your third line of thought, “godidit” is derogatory atheistic terminology and the links I provided give more comprehensive insight into ST and could be used in part to explain how a Creator might create.

Re your forth line of thought, I am using the word “creator [creators]” separate from the word “simulator” in the same way we would differentiate “Computer Program” from “Programmer” although – if it goes that way, I am happy to discuss why these might need to be conflated.

Thanks for giving your time to this thread Tanager.[/quote]

GM: My Kind of Fun Anyway
Insight It’s a living thing

William: Spirit-consciousness - Great Humor and Enjoyment
Live with the mystery

GM: https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1101871#p1101871

William: FTL:

[quote][quote=Diagoras post_id=1101868 time=1669780228 user_id=14307]

As you may recall, something from nothing is a logical absurdity, which is a gigantic step down from just having more than one unexplained.

Just how logically absurd is it though?

Consider the ‘logical absurdity’ of superposition (something being in two places at the same time), or of quantum entanglement (‘spooky action at a distance’) as described here.

It’s more truthful to say, “we observe quantum entanglement, but cannot fully explain it”, than to say it’s ’logically absurd’. I suggest ‘something from nothing’ should be treated in a similar fashion.
[/quote]

I think that superposition and quantum entanglement are part of the “something” and that they are thought of as strange, has to do with observations of the behavior of things not regarded as strange - whereas - the idea of “everything that exists coming from something which doesn’t exist” does fit into “logical absurdity” in that we do not observe anything coming from nothing, nor can we observe ‘nothing’ in any fundamental manner.

Therefore, I do not see how we should treat these things in a similar fashion.

Even if we accepted that the existence of this universe is a “logical absurdity” - I still don’t think we can treat the idea of nothing bringing it into existence as logical or sensible.[/quote]

GM: Tug Of War
The evolution of consciousness an illuminating quality

William: Onwards…

06:29
Sexual Encounters
Alike as two peas in a pod
The Power Of Creation
The crabwood cropcircle
The twelve disciples
Group Hallucination
Out of the doldrums
It is all information
GOD became Gods and Goddesses.