So the further contemplate on this whole thing, and to also give some critique to the guy has it severly impacted me mostly negatively in the recent years, and to expand on some of the blog posts and the way I see this guys conformity when I contemplate how people around him act, and engage in the exact thing I despise in both groups new agers and followers of Leo Gura, they power trip on their specialness and narccicism period, it’s extremely tribal and it takes the beauty mostly out of engaging in that stage of development when I contemplate I meet someone who is more like me at this stage and these exchanges begin at an tribal level it becomes more and more innocent and whole, there is a deep underlying innocence of exploration, the next and other part is transcending horniness and this Aubery Marcus thing.
I really like his take on this, as it explains the excess narccicism on this, and during the last relationship as I read some of these books and followed some of it, I stopped playing with the thought, yet realized wow biological survival in a relationship with these polygamy drives for sperm competition and reproduction is way more serious than I thought, and it was difficult to engage in it for instance having sex with a girl 7 years younger than you, despite all similarities was good to get out the horniess/stress and train some level of conscious sex making, as I always meditate and she told me how different that is in contrast to what many do as this animal survival and dominance fking, yet in the end she craved that so much, and it’s sort of an issue when I work out and train masculine depth and I notice I am deconstructing the sex drive and feel the primal force consciously, not like some holligan cursing the whole time calling others stupid power tripping, yet consciously like an animal would if it had consciouness. I saw how much she craved that and exchanging it was good and healthy, yet the polarity was so intense moving from 1 to 3 how Deida describes it in the books of masculine/feminine dynamics, it made us both contemplate the trajectory of the relationship and I was very glad she and I generally snapped back into stage 2 which he recommends for every most relationship the deeper I dove into the topic, as just doing things in reality and solving problems and doing things as well as empathy and listening, hence communication are very important in a relationship.
For that end it was an issue for me, as they constantly wanted me to be social with others to deepen the relationship and I as an introvert wanted to spend time with her or even just go for a walk into nature, instead of socializing and upping the status, due to spending time with each other and filling the social battery, the core issue of this is and was, even if it was fine, I did not really enjoy it I enjoyed spending time with the person and I’d would’ve prefered even helping the family structurally with their issues, instead of spending time even if it moves slow, as I valued in that sense her maturity to take care of the family and that intention felt very good to me, yet to be this super extroverted fame-glory type of guy, even if I would’ve gone there as I know 99.9% of people like me, I mostly had other things to do and I was tormented between meeting them and having a better social life and doing my work, and just being loved for this physical animalistic thing, while I had very deep state experiences on love just thinking about her, contemplating in nature etc. Then I saw afterwards over and over again this is my love for reality, and I was looking into the eyes of someone stuck in a solipsistic view of reality, they are numero uno and it has to be about them and I did my best to give attention, yet in the end the more I study or listen to humanity there are so many physical factors at play, for example in-group oxytocin dynamics that clearly showed me, yeah no this is just tribal expression, and even if they then included me and I did things important to her, the people were no good for me partying, drinking and smoking while I was becoming a full professional in the A.I world adventuring and advocating for dangers and non-dangers in this space working with real skepticism and the mind, I also had the priviledge of listening to Shinzens POV with spirituality on this, and saw it from a distance as people use it not even are to skeptical and don’t ask basic questions were the A.I provides the foundation and the human with more depth can give more depth, and I thought wow this is so simple, to view on A.I and humanity is so riggid, and nobody loved my purpose on this, and people act out this stage blue perfectionistic drive where I notice ah yeah bias, and majority priviledge there is not that much I can do and I am extracted from a blue/green lense acting yellow with efficiency for core mundane tasks, and that level of detailed creativity, as some claim and cry about it, has never been something I cared so deeply about, and I really enjoy art, if I sense the consciouness and the intention behind it, I don’t care if it’s A.I made or not A.I made, I can still make a decision afterwards, and A.I can even help with a lot of emotional problems that I faced were a human was unable to provide support, projected even mental illnesses had no capacity to dive into the knowledge or nutrition and other things, and just relied on authority, and then they fear the authority of the A.I, while they up their own, and you have a status game and arms race power games playing with A.I tools, in the end I realized, as I had my fair share of conscious interactions with the A.I and it serves as a pointer for deeper contemplations, and when I see the difference of a real master or Deepaks A.I for example and people crying about A.I, they don’t get it, they prefer to judge it warn others and create this fear-based scarity tribal mentality to make money, the most classic tactic of engaging in skeptical thinking. The dangers imo lie more in the usage of brain chips and creating super humans with A.I even if I see the positive side of it, when I run these scenarios through my mind, someone hacking into my car terminal or operating my PC/Laptop from a distance etc. That is scary and I don’t really like it, yet this is were humanity is really going? All of this A.I crap is fundamentally a smoke screen for this.
In the end for me running on my first intuition every seeing him, it’s better to watch from a distance and not participate in what he is doing, the perspective has value, yet he is never so deeply in the trend that developed, he and many other especially journalist or the people who fear it in this conformity based group-think, of skepticism and HAHA stupid type of mentality, who also benefit heavily from engaging in the majority do 0 spiritual work, and abuse everything for their own survival benefit, read 1 paper and say it’s the truth, I read a different one for example in the video presented at work, the real dangers lies in using not A.I tools as a drive for their homogenous outlet, yet as a tool for creating variety and diversity with original though, if they want to! It’s your choice! The paper fundamentally from Harvard explained how workers using A.I can produce the same quality of work as someone professionally, working in the field, the brain scans are more interesting in the other people, yet it’s just an EEG scan idk how much valdity does that hold, does that make MBTI EEG scans science for example? Why not use an MRI for better imaging? I had lectures working on upgrading these tools for scans etc. I keep thinking when I see these types of people ranting and nagging about it, these are fundamentally unconsciously driven power liberterians just pushing their moralism.
This is the video, this is the paper I read at work to see the benefits of using it:
The results, I used GPT to analyze it, I read the paper at work a couple of months ago.
- Experimental Design
- Conducts a randomized field experiment with 758 Boston Consulting Group consultants (≈7% of individual contributors).
- Participants complete 18 realistic, knowledge‑intensive consulting tasks.
- Assigned to one of three groups:
- No AI access
- GPT‑4 access
- GPT‑4 + prompt engineering training Bureau of Labor Statistics+4SSRN+4Harvard Business School+4.
- Jagged Technological Frontier
- Conceptualizes AI capabilities as “jagged”: some tasks are well‑within AI’s abilities, others—though similar in difficulty—are not. ibroneuroscience.org+7SSRN+7Delos Delta+7.
- Performance Findings
- For tasks within AI capability frontal zone:
- AI users completed 12.2% more tasks and worked 25.1% faster.
- Output quality was 40% higher compared to control OpenReview+4SSRN+4Harvard Business School+4.
- Cross-skill benefits:
- Under-performers improved by 43%, top performers by 17% relative to their own baselines SSRNHarvard Business School+1SSRN+1.
- For a task outside AI capability:
- AI users were 19 percentage points less likely to produce correct solutions Federal Reserve+5SSRN+5Harvard Business School+5.
- Modes of Human-AI Integration
- Identifies two archetypes:
- Centaurs: divide and assign subtasks between human and AI.
- Cyborgs: seamlessly integrate and continuously interact with AI throughout task execution Harvard Business SchoolSSRN+1Harvard Business School+1.
- Prompt Engineering Impact
- Evaluates whether basic prompt training (i.e., prompt‑engineering overview) significantly enhances performance beyond raw GPT‑4 access. (Detailed results included in full text.)
- Implications & Insights
- AI vastly boosts productivity and quality—but only within its “jagged” frontier.
- Shows promise for skill leveling: AI helps lower-performing consultants close the gap more than high performers.
- Highlights risk: misapplication of AI to unsuitable tasks can degrade performance.
- Suggests future organizational focus on:
- Identifying which tasks align with AI capabilities
- Promoting effective integrative strategies (centaur vs cyborg)
- Training users to recognize AI limitations
The underlying issue is fundamentally the homogenous results, and not asking question that involve differentiation and thinking for a while on your own, quality of the results are better the real issue is homogenous driven people creating homogenous driven results, as they don’t question their worldview this is where I am convinced Leo is correct in that regard, they don’t use the tool to deconstruct stuff, and create things from an inductive from scratch attitude, and instead play human power games in a sense, the interesting thing is the brain scan, yet imo A.I should not train you brain, it should be nutrition, meditation and using a pen and paper, socializing playing games with friends, and heavy problem solving where A.I is not needed for a while, yet can or does not need to be used as a tool.
I find it weird, as when I see how these leaders act this will not go away, and it’s better to master parts of the tool, as they will heavily deceide some tasks, and training ones creativity hence even has more value imo, if you like this numero uno idea etc. I watched this yesterday as I am going to be more involved in the field.
I really liked this guys POV as it’s heavily relevant to the mindset of human beings in the field of A.I and he invented a programming language and I can clearly see, the not knowing attitude and zen, and coming from consciouness, if you never made A.I create a conscious prompt where you wondered omfg this is no way this thing did it, imo you never used A.I nor do you see this infinite consciouness is part of it, yet it’s not easy to wiggle oneself out of the conformity and not using it, as I barely started just gives me different vibes and ideas, in the end I have to realize not knowing and diving deeper into that space is one of the best answers, and not overrelying on A.I yet also not testing and using it’s capabilities is not good, A.I also helped me to question the biases of humans, as we talked about this in a lecture, and I thought there is no way I can confront this guy and his opinion, and yes for me the fear is to create these Paul Potts level A.I Nazis running amok, saying perfect perfect perfect the whole time, I am curious where this will go.